1) 2 incriptions of Sangameshwar Salunkhes didn't exist
2) Salunke are solanki Not Chalukya
3) Lines in Somadeva Chalukya's inscription taken from Sangameshwar Mahatmya text
One inscription from karneshwara temple in Sangameshwara still exist there & has nothing to do with Kolhapur temple inscription
2nd inscription of Somadeva Chakukya from Kolhapur temple which was already translated & published in 1848 ce by Bal G. Shatri & nowhere it mentions Sangmeshwar Mahatmya
So BG Shatri who published the inscription in 1848 is lying, Keshavrao Nagesh, Graham, Rao Bahadur VN Mandlik is, RG Bhandarkar are also lying
Stone slabs getting destroyed or misplaced is a very common thing. Fleet was born 1 year before the inscription was published in 1848 ce
There are many such cases of missing Inscription
Example - NO ONE have seen Hastikundi Rashtrakuta inscription & no one knows where that inscription is
Chalukyas/Salunkes do not claim any ancestry from solanki rajput
It's Vidyadhar Srivastavya who tried to connect these two different clans cause he thinks Chalukya/Salunkhes of Badami were Solankis of Gujarat who came to deccan in 3rd ce (obviously false )
Mysuru academia must be the last talking about surnames & clans
All Kshatriyas clan names are taken by almost all non v2s in india this is nothing new.
96 Kulin Marathas bestowing their clan names on non v2s is recorded in 17th ce. Shahu Maharaja just made it simple for non v2s
96 Kulin Marathas Salunke/Chalukya clan name that are found in non v2s are in negligible number
But Solankis are mostly found among Kolis more than rajput
Vansh Bhaskar nowhere calls Jaswantrao Wable Salukhe as Solanki rajput It's Jadunath sarkar who tranlated it to Solanki
He's clearly called as "Deccani Chalukya Maratha" that's Chalukya of pure deccani origin & not Solanki origin
Chalukya's vernacular forms keep recurring in their inscription & interestingly both the vernacular forms
" चाळक्या & साळुंखे " are found in that same Rantagiri District where Kalyani Chalukya family settled & were feudatories under Seuna-Jadhavrao
Kalchuris of Mangalvedha traced their lineage from Kalachuri Krishna, founder of Kalachuris of Mahismati. Mahismati Kalachuri records never call themselves Haihayas like the Later Chedi Kalchuris.
Mangalvedha Kalachuris explicitly assert a Sūryavamśī descent in multiple records.
Notable records of Kalyani/Mangalvedha Kalachuris asserting Sūryavamśa are -
* HireMudannur record of Sūryavamśī (Kalachuri) Jogamarana
*Kolhapur Plates of Shelar Ganaradiya with a reference Bijjala I's Sūryavamśī lineage.
On The Chalukya / Salunke, Seuna Jadhavrao & Shirke / Hoysala era epithets attached to Shahannava Kuli Marathas based on their sheer bravery prior to 14th CE.
1) Dhumal / RanaDhumal - (धुमाळ / रणधुमाळ)
Meaning - The one who dash like a cyclone on the battlefield...
...Dhumal epithet is carried by the Kadamba marathas.
2) Bagul / Bagulrao - (बागुल / बागुलराव)
Meaning - Panther of the battlefield.
This epithet is carried by the Somvanshi Rashtrakuta Marathas.
Barring the original chapter that is supposed to be from 1448, other very recent chapters are composed by local castes of Bhandari, Pathare Pachaklasi & their scribal Prabhu section. The sole aim was to trace descent from Maratha Kshatriya Bimba Jadhava & his companions.
Bhandaris try tracing descent from Shinde Sheshvanshis while Pathare Pachkalsi & Prabhus developed a claim of descent from Somavanshi companions of Bimba Jadhava & Bimba himself. The names of Bimba's companions are imaginary ofc.
2/11
But all these castes admit themselves in the Bakhar that though they are descendants of Bimba and his Maratha Kshatriya companions, they got Patit or degraded due to taking up (Karkooni) scribal, peasant, carpenter, toddy tapper jobs and having undergone Varn-Sankara.
मुंबईत #परप्रांतीय यांच्याकडून मराठी माणसावर होत असलेल्या हल्ल्यांमागे 450 वर्षाचा इतिहास दडलेला आहे याची कोणाला कल्पनाही नाही.
मुंबईत मराठी माणसांवरील हल्ल्यांची सुरुवात थेट अकबराच्या मुघल हरम पासून होते. त्यामुळे परप्रांतीय आणि मुघल हरम यांचा संबंध काय ते जाणून घेऊ...
+
राजपुत लोक स्वत:चे किल्ले व जमीनदारी वाचवण्यासाठी मुघल,इंग्रज,अफगाण, पिंडारी इत्यादी कित्येक विदेशी शासकांना स्वतःच्या मुली देत हे सर्वश्रुत आहे. पण सध्या त्या सर्वांची एक यादी बनविणे ही वेळखाऊ प्रक्रिया असल्याने आपण उदाहरणासाठी फक्त जोधपूर मारवाड च्या रजपुतांची यादी पाहू...
+
1) इदर च्या भानजी रजपूत याने आपली मुलगी गुजरातचा मोहम्मद बैगरा़ याच्या हरम मध्ये पाठवले
Kadamba Maratha king of Goa, Jayakeshi I expanded his kingdom southwards by annexing the southern Canara that was under the rule of Tuluva Alupa dynasty. After which Jaykeshi seems to have established his close clansman Kavadeva Kadamba to rule the tract between Gokarna & Honavar
Successors of Kavadeva maintained their independence as cousins of Goa Kadambas until both were made vassals by the Imperial Seuna Jadhavraos.