1/14 Seth Rich Update: The FBI is playing really dirty. In an attempt to avoid disclosure of Seth’s personal and work laptops, the agency has invented a new story...
2/14 For the first time, the FBI is claiming that BOTH of Seth Rich's laptops are relevant to the murder investigation, therefore they need to withhold them ENTIRELY. lawflog.com/wp-content/upl…
3/14 Also for the first time, the FBI claims that the personal laptop is relevant to the ongoing “Russian hacking” prosecutions (yeah, you just thought the Russian collusion hoax was over)…
4/14 This begs a question: If the personal laptop is that important, then why did homicide investigators allow Seth’s brother to take it home IMMEDIATELY after the murder?
5/14 To this day, the FBI / MPD do not have a copy of the actual laptop, only an image drive made by Aaron, his brother. Why have they STILL not seized the actual laptop? And how weird is that your brother just got murdered, and the first thing you do is abscond with his laptop?
6/14 Previously, the FBI has told us that it never looked at either the work laptop or the personal laptop image. If that’s the case, then how can they know whether they are relevant to either investigation?
7/14 I also learned this evening that the FBI made a secret presentation to the court about all of this. The FBI’s sworn declaration does not give a date, but I suspect this is why Judge Mazzant has not enforced his decision ordering the FBI to produce data from the laptops.
8/14 You may recall that the FBI defied the court’s order to produce a joint production schedule for the laptop contents; instead, it cavalierly informed the court that it would be filing a motion for reconsideration. But that’s not what the FBI did…
9/14 No, the FBI filed yet another motion for summary judgment, and it follows a pattern. When the FBI loses on an issue, it files a new motion raising entirely new issues that it could have and should have raised earlier.
10/14 Even in the new motion, the FBI claims that it is reserving yet additional issues that it will raise IF it loses this motion. The plan is obvious. The FBI wants to drag this out not just beyond the 2024 election, but in perpetuity.
11/14 The FBI’s motion includes what purports to be the 8th sworn declaration of FBI Section Chief Michael G. Seidel. It’s actually his ninth declaration. The FBI has changed its story so many times that it is losing count. Take a look at Paragraph 10… lawflog.com/wp-content/upl…
12/14 Seidel does not give us any dates, but it looks like the FBI reached out to the U.S. Attorney’s Office in DC to concoct a new reason for withholding the laptops, i.e., “just say that it is relevant to your murder investigation.” It took seven years to figure that out?
13/14 And where is @Jim_Jordan and @JudiciaryGOP? Could @RepJamesComer, @GOPoversight, @RepMattGaetz, @RepMTG or @SpeakerJohnson take a look at this? This has all the hallmarks of a massive cover-up (please RETWEET so we can get their attention).
Yeah, I need to upgrade my account so I don’t have to do these old-school numbered tweet strings. That's for tomorrow.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
1/4 @DOJ told me this afternoon that we will not be getting any Seth Rich records on March 10. The @FBI only intends to produce a "Vaughn index," which gives a brief description of what they are withholding and why. That means that the feds are not even willing to produce...
2/4 ...the metadata from Seth's electronic devices. I'm not thrilled about this, but we're playing the long game. In the same case, I can already prove that the @FBI improperly withheld pages from the @CrowdStrike reports about the 2016 @DNC "hack" that was published by @wikileaks...
3/4 ...so this probably won't play well with the court. More importantly, @Kash_Patel and @AGPamBondi will learn about this, and I suspect some heads will roll. That's long overdue, because the FOIA office at @FBI is systemically corrupt. The bureaucrats can run, but they can't hide.
(1/5 ) After years of litigation and stonewalling by the @FBI, a federal judge ordered the feds to produce Seth Rich records by Feb. 7th. Today, the FBI told me it wants more time. Maybe @Kash_Patel and @realDonaldTrump need to hear about this...
(2/5) On August 16, 2024, Judge Amos Mazzant ordered the FBI to process and produce records from Seth's electronic devices not later than February 7, 2025. A few weeks later, in order to expedite things before the election...
(3/5) ...we proposed that the FBI just produce metadata and file names. That should have been enough to determine whether Seth was the source of the DNC emails published by Wikileaks in 2016. The FBI did not respond. I followed up again in October. The FBI did not respond...
1/6 New Seth Rich documents, fresh off the grill! FBI filed a new motion about CrowdStrike records. I've only given it a cursory review, but we have at least one bombshell (in 5/7). #FridayNightDocumentDump
2/6 Here we have the SEVENTH sworn declaration of FBI records honcho Michael G. Seidel, who regularly needs to update and revise the official narrative (because the feds are LYING)...
1/12 Here are the Seth Rich records filed by the FBI on Friday night. The FBI has acknowledged it had Seth's personal and work laptops. The FBI wrote a report about Seth's work laptop but now refuses to disclose the report because... lawflog.com/wp-content/upl…
2/12...Russian collusion!! Yes, releasing a report about SETH RICH's work laptop would somehow jeopardize the non-existent prosecutions of the Russian intelligence agents indicted by Robert Mueller...
3/12 I've attached the declaration of Michael Seidel, the FBI official in charge of hiding public information from the public. He tries to explain why none of the records previously showed up in the five years that I have been requesting them. #EpicFail lawflog.com/wp-content/upl…