But with 1000 bar of water pressure, you can shatter shale with the fists of Poseidon, and squeeze out precious, precious methane.
This is The Fracking Thread!
Fracking is an old technique, frequently used for increasing production from worked-out oil wells, but has found new application in unlocking natural gas from tightly-held geology such as shale.
Let's step through this apparently brutal, yet sophisticated process.
In short, you need to:
-Drill vertically to the shale, then horizontally along the shale layer.
-Case & cement hazard areas.
-Use a perforating gun to start the fracturing process.
-Pump fracturing fluid to extend fractures.
-Gas production.
We'll go over these in turn.
Firstly, what is shale gas?
Hydrocarbons are produced over millions of years from deep buried organic matter. Conventionally it can rise into a porous reservoir rock and become trapped under a cap layer.
Or it can form, reservoir *and* be trapped in impermeable shale.
For usable thermal shale gas to form it must be:
>2% organic matter.
Below 600m depth.
Exposed to suitably high pressure & temperature.
Be >20m thick for economic extraction.
Bedrock structure preventing gas from escaping: e.g mountain chain folding, fault movements & uplift.
How do you turn a vertical bore to a horizontal one? Many ways...
A lobed steel rotor rotates from hydraulic pressure inside an elastomer-lined stator with more lobes than the rotor. The number of lobes trade RPM for torque as shown.
The drill fluid also cools the bits and stabilise the shaft in turn.
Where is the drill bit?
Thousands of feet down, sometimes miles away.
Arrays of accelerometers and magnetometers measure inclination (up/ down) and azimuth (compass heading, following magnetic North surveying). Together with drill string length, this allows precise tracking.
What am I drilling?
Data is tracked while drilling, from the vitals:
-Torque, vibration, temperature, pressure.
To surveying options:
-Natural gamma ray sensors, electric resistivity, neutron porosity. These detect density, salt water, hydrocarbon presence etc
How do I transmit the data?
The most steampunk way of all: With a mud pulser!
'Mud' is a general term for drill fluid, used to cool the bit, carry away cuttings and pressurize the shaft.
A pulser transmits low bit-rate data through pressure pulses in the mud itself.
Wellbore casing.
A layered wall of cement & steel providing support for the wellbore, protecting against over & under-pressure, isolating the surface from high pressure zones and preventing contamination of geology or groundwater.
Not just a pipe.
Different casing stages isolate surface zones, production zones etc per engineering requirements. They start wide and get narrower with depth, and feature 'feet' that support cement filling between casing & wall to support & isolate zones.
The perforation gun.
Casing & cementing is well & good, but when we get to the extraction zone we need to be open to the reservoir to start fracturing!
A shaped charge cuts through casing & cement and drives fissures into the shale to start initial fracturing.
Hydraulic fracturing!
Fracking fluid is pumped into the reservoir fissures, over a mile below the surface, at 1,000 bar using huge 2,500hp reciprocating pumps. This places huge stress on the fractured rock, opening the fissures to 200ft-400ft in length.
It is done in stages...
1) Pre-flush stage.
A thin, low friction solution goes first, to open up fissures, lower frictional losses from subsequent stages and cool down the rock so that subterranean heat does not affect subsequent flow viscosity.
2) Pad stage.
High viscosity fluid is pumped in to enlarge the fractures further. This viscous fluid will hold sand, or proppant, in the third stage.
The extent of the fractures are monitored by micro-seismology to ensure they stay within the reservoir.
3) Proppant stage.
Proppant (usually sand) is mixed in with the viscous fluid and injected into the fissures to keep them open once the pressure recedes and prevent the fissures from collapsing, to allow gas extraction to occur.
4) Flush stage:
At the end of slurry placement, a volume of clean 'flush' is pumped in to clear tubulars of proppant. The pressure is then bled off to allow the fractures to close onto the injected proppant.
Chemicals.
Fracking fluid is almost entirely water, but it's carefully tailored to it's specific use, and some of the potential 'ingredients' can be hair raising...
So preventing groundwater contamination is crucial.
But a note of sanity: Fracking takes place over a mile below water tables, in impermeable shale. Waste water can be taken away for reprocessing.
There are risks, but it has the potential to be safe, *if* it is well regulated and kept away from water sources and communities.
It's getting more efficient.
Up to 140 wells have been fracked from a single site, up to 3 miles away.
Measurement & analysis is ever improving.
Waste water recycling is becoming more common.
And practice makes perfect...
The USA is fracking central, with over 1.7 million fracking wells completed. It's a vital link in the energy security of the entire world.
And when Russia turned off the taps in 2022, American LNG rode to the rescue of Europe.
So let's sing a hesitant hymn for this reviled monster, who toils in the gloom for us all. -That even if we do not appreciate it, we might understand it.
Here's to Fracking!
There's a downloadable lecture series for those who are interested, available on Researchgate.
I hope you enjoyed this!
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
It's the greatest story never told: It's the story of how a frugal county in the North of England invented the modern world.
Put on a flat cap and call up the whippet, because this is a thread about my home county, and the inventions that came out of Yorkshire!
Steel!
Benjamin Huntsman invented high homogeneity crucible steel in Sheffield in the 1740s, firing with coke to fully melt the steel and homogenise the carbon content.
This became used… everywhere, and supercharged the ongoing industrial revolution.
Steam trains.
Steam locomotion had been in development for some decades by 1812, but arguably the world's first commercially successful steam locomotive was Matthew Murray's Salamanca. To him, we owe speed.
A liquid rocket boost stage needs to pump fuel and cryogenic oxidiser to the combustion chamber at a rate that beggars belief: The 33 engines on the boost stage of SpaceX's monstrous ‘Superheavy’ booster each chew through about 700 kg of propellant every second. Put all those engines together and the flow rate of liquid fuel & oxygen would be sufficient to empty an Olympic swimming pool in under 2 minutes, if you could find an Olympic swimming pool for cryogenic propellant.
Can you think of any conventional lightweight pump that can do this? Me neither. You need something special…
The turbopump comprises a typically-axial turbine powered by hot, pressurised gas flow that powers centrifugal compressor pumps that pump the colossal quantities of propellant required and pressurize it to, potentially, hundreds of standard atmospheres.
It's a handy, lightweight way to provide pumping power, but it does require that you have a source of hot, high-pressure gas to work with.
Now, where would you find that in a rocket engine?
Indeed. In order to burn fuel, we must pump it. In order to pump it, we may have to burn some of it.
Um…
The Gas Generator Cycle.
A small quantity of the pressurised fuel & oxidiser flows are tapped, brought to a small combustor, vaporised, ignited then expanded through a turbine that powers the fuel and oxygen compressor cycles.
Inevitably the gas generator can't run with a completely nominal fuel:oxy mix, as it would get so hot that it would melt the turbine blades, so typically a gas generator will trade off some efficiency and run fuel rich to power the turbopumps.
-Why not oxy rich? Because fuel has a higher specific heat at constant pressure (Cp) and so you need less mass flow through the gas generator if it's fuel rich than oxy rich, meaning more useful propellant goes to the main combustor & nozzle that moves the rocket.
So the upside of a gas generator cycle is relative simplicity and robustness, which is why it's used on the most reliable rocket motors around, the SpaceX Merlin. The downside is that you trade away efficiency by throwing away some of your propellant, meaning that the tyranny of the Tsiolkowsky rocket equation will kick you where the sun don't shine.
Staged combustion attempts to address this, by taking either a fuel rich or oxy rich preburner, operating at a much higher flow volume than a standard gas generator, and routing the hot gases that leave the turbine straight to the combustion chamber so that they're not lost. This not only increases the average propellant exhaust velocity (since none of it is lost) and therefore efficiency, but also allows a lower average temperature in the preburner and turbine, since there's a higher volume throughput instead.
On the flipside you must deal with hugely increased engineering complexity, an increased potential for feedback control problems between the different parts of the engine, and also a much higher pressure preburner, since it will still need to deliver high working pressures to the combustion chamber after the losses of the turbine and injectors.
The Soviets got there first, and some of their genius manifested in the Russian RD180 oxy-rich staged combustion engine, which was bought by the Americans and used in Atlas rockets for many years. Its unique oxy-rich staged combustion cycle was efficient but not without drawbacks, as high temperature gaseous oxygen is brutal to exposed metal surfaces, demanding an enamel coating on many parts of the engine.
Last month Rolls-Royce won the UK's small modular reactor competition to develop and build SMRs in the UK. It could be a new dawn for nuclear power.
But who else was in the competition, what was special about each design, and which is your favourite?
An SMR thread…
What's an SMR?
A small modular reactor is a way of beating the brutally high capital costs of building nuclear power: By simplifying assembly (modularity) and minimising subsystem size so almost all of it is factory built you harvest industrial learner effects and low costs.
Boiling water vs pressurised water reactors.
All designs in this list are either PWRs or BWRs, the most common reactor styles today. I've a thread on the basics if you need it, but otherwise on with the show!
In April on a mountain in Chile the Vera Rubin observatory gathered first light, and this telescope will be world-changing! -Not because it can see the furthest… but because it can see the fastest!
The Vera Rubin telescope thread! The value of speed, and unique technology…
Who was Vera Rubin?
She first hypothesized the existence of dark matter, by observing that the rotation speed of the edge of the galaxy did not drop off with radius from the centre as much as it should. The search for dark matter, and other things, will drive this telescope…
Does it see a long way?
Yes, but it’s not optimized for that: The battle of the big mirrors is won by the Extremely Large Telescope which, yes, is meant to see a long way. Vera Rubin is not that big, but that doesn’t matter because it has a different and maybe better mission.
Rotating detonation engines: Riding the shockwave!
A technology that could revolutionise aviation, powering engines with endlessly rotating supersonic shockwaves. It could bring us hypersonic flight, super high efficiency and more.
The detonation engine thread…
Almost all jet engines use deflagration based combustion, not detonation, but while fuel efficiency has been improving for decades, we're well into the phase of decreasing returns and need some game-changing technologies.
One is the rotating detonation engine (RDE).
To understand the appeal of RDEs, you need to know that there are two forms of combustion cycle: Constant pressure, where volume expands with temperature, and constant volume, where pressure goes up instead.
Most jet engines use constant pressure. RDEs use constant volume.
As a new graduate I once had to sit down and draft an engine test program for a subsystem of a new model of Rolls-Royce aero engine. It was illuminating.
So here's a thread on some of the weirder things that this can involve: The jet engine testing thread!
Fan Blade Off!
Easily the most impressive test: A jet engine needs to be able to contain a loose fan blade. In the FBO test, either a full engine or a fan & casing rig in low vacuum is run to full speed, then a blade is pyrotechnically released.
Frozen.
The Manitoba GLACIER site in Northern Canada is home to Rolls-Royce's extreme temperature engine test beds. Not only must these machines be able to start in temperatures where oil turns to syrup, but in-flight ice management is crucial to safe flying.