First, trump added some protected discovery supplements (two dozen witness names and other evidence) to a motion to compel, then asked Cannon to UNSEAL those supplements. Cannon said YES, and that the witness names and evidence would be UNSEALED today. 2/
Two days ago, Jack Smith said "hey, tomorrow, we're gonna file our opposition to you unsealing these, but we'd like to add some evidence supporting our position, so can we file that evidence under seal and ex parte? It's part of an its own ongoing investigation." 3/
Cannon said "sure you can file that under seal". So yesterday, Jack Smith filed his motion to stop Cannon from UNSEALING the two dozen witnesses and evidence, and added their sealed evidence of witness intimidation. Evidence they were told would be ex parte and sealed. 4/
This morning, Cannon said "okay, I won't UNSEAL the witness list and evidence today, and I'm giving trump until 2/23 to respond to your motion asking to keep the witness list and evidence sealed." 5/
And then a couple of hours ago, Cannon said "oh, by the way, that sealed evidence of witness intimidation that's currently under federal investigation? I'm ordering you to give that to trump's team by tomorrow. I know I said it would be ex parte, but I changed my mind" 6/
SO. I *think* Jack Smith will OPPOSE giving trump the evidence of witness intimidation. Whether he does that with her or the 11th circuit, I don't know. But that has nothing to do with the two dozen witnesses and evidence thing. 7/
Keeping the two dozen witnesses and evidence under seal won't be decided until after trump gets to respond on 2/23. But right now, the evidence of witness intimidation currently under investigation is due to trump tomorrow, and thats NUTS. 8/
Smith ASKED her if he could file it under seal and EX PARTE - meaning NOT PUBLIC and NOT FOR TRUMP TO SEE. And yesterday, she GRANTED that. But TODAY, she's reneging on the "ex parte" part and ORDERING Smith to give it to trump's team by tomorrow. 9/
Like, what the fuck? The DoJ had HER WORD that it could be filed without trump knowing, and now that she's "reviewed it", she's CHANGING HER MIND. 10/
I hope Jack Smith appeals to the 11th circuit and asks for a writ of mandamus asking the circuit court to ORDER Cannon to reverse her decision to give this witness intimidation evidence to the trump team. 11/
Again, this is separate from the broader issue of her wanting to unseal the two dozen witness names and evidence. Perhaps DoJ will include that in their filing to the 11th circuit, but it may not be ripe for hearing yet because she hasn't ruled on it. END/
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
BREAKING: THREAD: Jack Smith has filed a motion for Judge Cannon to RECONSIDER her recent ruling that would unseal witness names & the substance of their testimony, putting them at significant risk of immediate threats and intimidation. 1/
Smith says that trump attached protected discovery information to court filings to shift the burden to the government to prove sealing is necessary & that Cannon wrongly decided witness safety/grand jury secrecy/integrity of the trial are not good enough reasons to seal. 2/
Smith says Cannon was WRONG in 2 respects & should reconsider. He then cites the 11th circuit, which has bench slapped Cannon before. 3/
THREAD: This is a great thread in that it offers criticisms of DoJ without trashing the institution. I'd like to go through it. I agree with the first point. Special Counsel should have been appointed to investigate Trump earlier. I called for one back in Oct 2021. 1/
Next point: Jack Smith should have charged insurrection because a conviction would result in disqualification. I can see that, though it would have brought a 1A headache, which is not only hard to charge but would be a guaranteed interlocutory appeal. 2/
Additionally, a conviction wouldn't have been guaranteed, & a conviction wouldn't have happened in time. Besides, I agree with @maddow that Kavanaugh only brought that up because trump WASN'T charged with insurrection. Had he been, Kavanaugh would have found another argument. 3/
BREAKING: E Jean Carroll’s lawyer has reserved the right to file rule 11 SANCTIONS against Alina Habba for fabricating a conflict of interest between the judge and Carroll’s lawyer. 1/
Habba alleged Roberta Kaplan and Judge Kaplan had a mentor-mentee relationship at a law firm they both worked for, and that the judge failed to disclose it. Problem is, it was over 30 years ago, at a massive firm, and the two never crossed paths. 2/
More significantly, Habba says she learned about the “relationship” from the New York Post, but the Post published its article AFTER Habba insinuated the relationship publicly. Further, the fact they both worked for the firm has been public information for a while. 3/
THREAD: DID YOU KNOW: Donald Trump tried mercilessly to shield a Turkish bank from facing punishment for HELPING fund Iran? While president, he FIRED to prosecutors investigating it. He asked cabinet officials to OBSTRUCT JUSTICE by pressuring DoJ to drop the probe. 1/
The crime, perpetrated by Halkbank in Turkey, is the BIGGEST EFFORT TO EVADE SANCTIONS AGAINST IRAN in history. Trump personally pressured AGs Matthew Whitaker and Bill Barr to drop the case, and fired Preet Bharara who was the lead prosecutor. 2/
Rex Tillerson even refused an order from Trump to pressure the DoJ to back off. And when Trump met with Erdogan at the G-20, he told him he would "take care of it." Two weeks later on the phone, Trump told Erdogan he had assigned Barr and Mnuchin to "handle" the issue. 3/
THREAD: TRUMP'S FISCAL BABYSITTER: So does everyone remember when the New York Attorney General was concerned that Donald Trump and the Trump Org. were still doing fraud, and appointed retired Judge Barbara Jones to monitor the business activity? 1/ cnn.com/2022/11/14/pol…
That came after the NYAG found that Trump had created a new LLC called-& I shit you not-Trump Organization II. She was concerned he was trying to offload assets before her civil fraud trial. She asked Judge Engoron to appoint a monitor, and he did. 2/ reuters.com/markets/us/new…
So up to that point, the timeline went like this:
September 2022: Trump creates Trump Org II
October 2022: NYAG asks for a monitor
November 2022: Engoron appoints Barbara Jones
December 2022: Trump Org convicted on 17 counts of tax fraud
January 2023: Trump org fined $1.6M 3/
THREAD: The goal of No Labels is to prevent either candidate from reaching 270 electoral votes. An Amicus Brief filed in the Colorado 14th Amendment case taken up by SCOTUS ponders this exact scenario if SCOTUS fails to resolve the 14th Amendment question now. 1/
"Imagine a less likely but still plausible scenario in which a third party candidate joins the race and wins sufficient electoral votes to deny any one candidate a majority in the Electoral College." 2/
"Here, the election would be sent the House under the 12th Amendment, & the question of Mr. Trump’s disqualification under Sec 3 could arise not just once, but twice: 1st in the Joint Session counting electoral votes, & then in the House during its 12th Amendment proceedings." 3/