HAPPENING NOW: Judge McAfee is set to hear argument on several motions to quash subpoenas ahead of Thursday's hearing on whether Fulton County district attorney Fani Willis should be disqualified from prosecuting Trump & others.
Watch live:
Six motions to quash have been filed, per Judge McAfee.
The individuals who moved to quash include:
(1) DA Fani Willis & several members of her staff (2) Special prosecutor Nathan Wade (3) Robin Yeartie, a long-time Willis associate (4) Wade's law partner, Chris Campbell
McAfee sets out what he thinks is relevant to the disqualification inquiry:
- Whether relationship existed
- Was it romantic
- When it formed
- Whether it continues
Those questions are relevant only insofar as they relate to alleged personal benefit had in the prosecution..
McAfee continues that some issues raised in defense motions are not relevant, including:
- Wade’s experience
- Alleged lack of experience handling RICO cases
- Alleged violations of Fulton County regulations/municipal code
- Allegations of “forensic misconduct” by DA Willis
McAfee starts with the motion to quash filed by Anna Cross on behalf of DA Willis and members of the DA's prosecution team.
Mike Roman's attorney, Ashleigh Merchant, subpoenaed 9 members of DA's staff
Of all the witnesses subpoenaed, Cross says, there will be no witness who would dispute the affirmations in the Wade affidavit previously filed by the state.
The defense is bringing you gossip..and the court should not condone that, Cross says.
Merchant, on behalf of Mike Roman, says there are disputed issues of fact.
She says Wade filed pleadings in his divorce case that he did not have relationship w/ anyone else during his marriage...Wade subsequently updated those interrogatories & pleaded the Fifth, per Merchant.
Merchant addresses why she has subpoenaed various witnesses.
She says Wade's former law partner/former attorney, Terrence Bradley, can testify to disputed questions of fact regarding when the relationship started and whether people on the DA's team knew of the relationship.
Cross responds for the DA: “I would be shocked if Ms. Merchant is able to support that statement…I don’t believe it’s true.”
At Thursday's hearing, the state will establish that Wade & Willis never cohabitated and that the relationship did not begin before 2022, Cross says.
Cross asks McAfee to defer ruling on the motions to quash subpoenas to Willis and members of her team.
She says Merchant should first be required to establish sufficient basis for those subpoenas based on testimony from her witness, Bradley.
McAfee agrees to defer ruling.
Now Andrew Evans, for Nathan Wade, addresses Wade's motion to quash subpoenas for bank records related to his law practice.
He says they are overly broad, irrelevant.
Merchant replies that they are relevant bc Wade used law firm money to pay for trips he took w/ Willis.
Before wrapping up on the motions to quash, McAfee asks if there are any remaining issues.
Cross, on behalf of DA's office, asks McAfee if a witness for the state can testify via Zoom on Thursday.
The witness? John Floyd, the district attorney's father.
For her part, Merchant, on behalf of Mike Roman, tells Judge McAfee that Nathan Wade has refused service of subpoenas issued for his testimony.
McAfee instructs counsel in attendance to confer together ahead of Thursday to streamline argument and presentation of witnesses.
Then Steve Sadow stands up in the gallery and announces that he has an "unrelated matter" to take up with the court ex parte in chambers.
Bottom line: Thursday’s disqualification hearing will proceed, despite DA’s insistence that McAfee cancel it.
It’s TBD which witnesses—including Fani Willis—will be compelled to testify.
McAfee deferred ruling on many motions to quash until after Terrence Bradley testifies.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
I spent my day at a federal courthouse in Atlanta, where I observed closing arguments in a trial over the security of Georgia’s voting systems.
Among the spectators in the gallery?
Will Wooten, one of the lead prosecutors on the Fulton County criminal case against Trump. 1/
It’s no surprise that Fulton County prosecutors are closely following the civil case known as Curling v. Raffensperger.
For one thing, it’s the case that uncovered part of the alleged RICO conspiracy to overturn the 2020 election: The voting system breach in Coffee County.
2/
With respect to that prong of the conspiracy, the Fulton County indictment closely tracks evidence produced in discovery for the Curling case.
And several witnesses who testified during the Curling trial are expected to be called as witnesses in the Fulton County case.
3/
I reviewed Nathan Wade’s unsealed divorce filings—including documents labeled “sensitive,” which are not available online.
Here’s what I found ⬇️👇
Aside from the credit card statements filed last week, the docs do not appear to provide additional evidence of a relationship between Fani Willis & Nathan Wade.
Nor do they provide further evidence supporting the claim that Willis financially benefitted from Wade’s hiring. 2/
The documents paint a portrait of a contentious divorce and mounting frustration on the part of Joycelyn Wade’s counsel as Nathan Wade failed to comply with discovery obligations.
Wade was eventually held in contempt for failing to turn over documents.
3/
Hello from Cobb County Superior Court in Marietta, Georgia.
At 11:30 ET, Judge Henry Thompson is set to hear argument over whether Fulton County district attorney Fani Willis can be compelled to sit for a deposition in the divorce proceedings of special prosecutor Nathan Wade.
Judge Thompson is also weighing whether to unseal Wade’s divorce case documents.
The hearing comes amid allegations made in a filing from Trump co-defendant Mike Roman, who alleges that Willis and Wade had an “improper” relationship.
Watch the hearing:
First up: Ashleigh Merchant arguing on behalf of Mike Roman.
Merchant wants the divorce filings unsealed.
She contends that the initial order sealing Wade's divorce case is void bc the judge did not hold a hearing required by statute.
HAPPENING NOW: Judge McAfee is set to hear argument on a series of motions in the Fulton County RICO case against Trump and 14 others.
Most of the matters on the agenda today concern motions filed by Trump co-defendant Harrison Floyd.
We're starting with argument on one of Eastman's motions to throw out the RICO charge.
His attorney begins by telling Judge McAfee that Eastman goes by "Dr.," not "Mr.," Eastman.
Eastman has a PhD, he says.
Eastman's attorney argues that the indictment doesn't sufficiently allege how Eastman's conduct amounted to a "corrupt" effort to overturn the results of the 2020 election.
John Floyd, for the state, points out that the state need not spell that out in the indictment.
Fulton County district attorney Fani Willis addressed churchgoers at Big Bethel AME in her first public remarks since Trump co-defendant Mike Roman sought to disqualify her based on an alleged “improper” relationship with special prosecutor Nathan Wade.
🧵with videos⬇️
Willis read a letter she penned to God in a moment of prayer earlier this week.
Describing herself as an "imperfect" and "flawed" person, Willis recounted the challenges she has faced during her time as district attorney.
Willis called out congresswoman Marjorie Taylor Greene, who earlier this week asked Georgia Attorney General Chris Carr to investigate Willis's hiring of Wade.
“I never want to be a Marjorie Taylor Greene, who has never met me but has allowed her spirit to be filled with hate."
HAPPENING NOW: Judge Scott McAfee is set to hear argument on a series of motions filed in the sprawling Fulton County RICO case against Trump and 14 others.
Watch the hearing live here:
Judge McAfee kicks things off with argument over the sufficiency of the allegations in the indictment under Georgia's RICO statute. The question, in part, is whether the statute requires allegations of economic or physical harm.
Here's the partial agenda for today's hearing:
Up next: Judge McAfee turns to a motion filed by Trevian Kutti's attorneys to withdraw from representing her in the case.