🔍 New Study Sheds Light on COVID-19 and Dementia Risk in Older Adults 🧠💡
A groundbreaking study in preprint at Lancet has revealed a significant link between COVID-19 infection and the increased risk of new-onset dementia (NOD) in older adults (60+ years).
Here’s what you need to know...
What Did Researchers Do?
- Reviewed 11 studies involving nearly 940,000 people who had COVID-19 and over 6.7 million controls (without COVID-19).
- Compared the risk of developing dementia post-COVID across various time frames up to 24 months after infection.
Key Findings:
- COVID-19 survivors are at a higher risk of developing dementia, with a risk ratio (RR) of 1.58, meaning they’re 58% more likely to develop dementia than those without the virus.
- This risk spikes to 84% higher than non-COVID individuals at 12 months post-infection.
- Women and patients with severe COVID-19 showed significantly higher risks of developing dementia.
Why It Matters:
- This study highlights COVID-19’s long-term neurological impacts, stressing the importance of monitoring older adults post-recovery.
- It also emphasizes the need for strategies to mitigate these risks and supports early intervention.
Strengths of the Study:
- Large sample size offers robust data.
- First of its kind focusing on older adults and the long-term risk of dementia post-COVID.
- Rigorous analysis methods strengthen the reliability of findings.
Limitations to Consider:
- High heterogeneity among the included studies means results should be interpreted with caution.
- Mostly retrospective design limits the ability to establish causality.
- Follow-up durations varied, and longer-term effects beyond 24 months remain unclear.
The Bottom Line:
COVID-19 isn’t just a short-term illness; it has lasting implications, particularly for the elderly, underscoring the need for vigilance in post-COVID care.
Looking Ahead:
Future research should explore the effects of repeated infections, vaccination status, and develop targeted prevention and rehabilitation strategies to protect our seniors.
Spread the word and protect your friends, family and co-workers! 🌍💖
#COVID19Research #DementiaAwareness #PublicHealth
🧵 In science and medicine, honesty about one’s credentials isn’t just good ethics — it’s essential to public trust.
The line between “student,” “medical doctor,” and “researcher” exists for a reason: people rely on these labels to decide whose advice could affect their health.
Imagine someone trained as a veterinarian speaking about human cardiology and letting others call them “doctor.”
They are a doctor — but of animals. The training, licensure, and legal responsibilities are completely different. Titles mean something because lives depend on them.
For instance, in Ireland’s Royal College of Surgeons (RCSI), there are two main paths to becoming a physician:
•Undergraduate entry: a 5–6 year program starting right after secondary school.
•Graduate Entry Programme (GEP): a 4-year fast-track route, but only for people who already hold a bachelor’s degree.
So if someone graduated high school in, say, 2008, they couldn’t possibly have “finished” the medical program by 2010 unless time travel was part of the curriculum. You probably shouldn’t call yourself a “Jr Doctor” either eh?
“Calling SARS-CoV-2 ‘Airborne AIDS’ is biologically imprecise but epidemiologically instructive — it conveys that repeated infections can progressively undermine immune competence across large populations.”
“Multiple studies now demonstrate persistent T-cell dysregulation, exhaustion, and reduced proliferative capacity months after infection — changes that mirror key features of chronic HIV infection.”
🧠 COVID Truth Defense Playbook
A Strategy Guide for Responding to Anti-Science Doctors and Bad-Faith Medical Professionals (on social media… something I’m still working on)
Disclaimer: This is NOT MEDICAL ADVICE.
🔑 Core Principles 1/ Don’t debate science deniers—define them.
Never waste time arguing the basics with someone who’s already shown contempt for the scientific process. 2/ Flip the burden of proof back on them.
“If you’re not disturbed by these findings, show us the evidence that disproves them.”
Every study has limitations. Don’t get dragged into “journal club” mode with denialists. It’s a trap designed to waste your time and obscure the big picture. 3/ Establish linguistic symmetry.
Just as “climate denier” became a recognizable label through repeated use of truth, so too should terms like COVID minimizer, airborne denier, and immune damage denier. 4/ Never fight on their turf. Shift the frame.
If they demand RCTs for every mechanism, call out the impossibility and the double standard. We don’t require RCTs to prove smoking causes cancer or that parachutes prevent death.
🎯 Target Categories & Labels
Use these sparingly, strategically, and with citations or quotes when possible. Think of them like rhetorical scalpel tools—not sledgehammers.
1. AIDS Denier
🧬 Definition: Any healthcare professional who denies or dismisses the growing convergent evidence that SARS-CoV-2 causes long-term immune system damage via T cell depletion, immune exhaustion, and persistent viral reservoirs—especially when they insist on RCTs to “prove” causality.
📌 “We didn’t demand RCTs to prove HIV causes AIDS. We looked at converging evidence: immunological damage, depletion of T cells, chronic infections, and organ pathology. SARS-CoV-2 shows similar patterns. If you deny that, you’re not a skeptic. You’re an AIDS denier.”
Note: SARS-CoV-2 doesn’t cause AIDS in the traditional sense—and it deserves its own classification, just as Long Covid is not the same as ME/CFS. But the virus can induce an AIDS-like acquired immune dysfunction. To deny this is to deny the very framework we used to understand the original AIDS epidemic. So ask them: What’s your evidentiary threshold for recognizing an airborne virus that causes chronic immune damage?
Put the burden back on them. You don’t owe them a full literature review. If they attack your position, it’s their job to support theirs—with citations.
2. Airborne Biohazard ☣️ Denier
🌬️ Definition: Any doctor who minimizes or denies the airborne transmission of SARS-CoV-2 and refuses to mask or take precautions, despite overwhelming evidence from fluid dynamics, outbreak investigations, and expert consensus.
📌 “We no longer debate whether COVID is airborne. The science is settled. If you still treat this like a droplet disease that magically went away and returned as ‘just a cold’ in 2025, you’re not just outdated—you’re an airborne biohazard denialist clinging to the myth that betacoronaviruses naturally evolve to become mild. There’s no evidence for that—and plenty against it.”
3. Science Denier
📚 Definition: Any professional who handwaves away peer-reviewed studies, systematic reviews, or expert consensus published in top-tier journals, demanding only RCTs—especially when ethical or logistical constraints prevent them.
📌 “RCTs aren’t the only valid method. Epidemiology, immunology, and pathology also count. Public data from schools, transit systems, and health departments may all be relevant—because methods should follow the research question, not ideology. If you ignore converging evidence in favor of fantasy RCTs, you're not practicing evidence-based medicine—you’re performing denial in a lab coat.”
ChatGPT’s 10-Year Forecast: 2025–2035
This projection considers current trajectories in public health, economy, governance, climate, and technological development. The following scenarios range from **high-probability outcomes** to **wildcard possibilities** that depend on unpredictable variables.
---
2025–2027: The Unraveling Begins
Public Health: Silent Mass Disability Crisis
- **Long COVID and chronic illness reach undeniable levels**, with many under 50 developing early-onset neurodegenerative diseases (Alzheimer’s-like symptoms, Parkinsonism).
- **Workplace inefficiencies escalate**—more mistakes in aviation, healthcare, and transportation lead to industrial accidents and service failures.
- **Medical systems start cracking** under a wave of post-viral syndromes and treatment-resistant infections. Healthcare workers face mass burnout or cognitive impairment themselves.
- **H5N1 or another airborne virus could become a pandemic**, further overwhelming a broken system.
- **Mental health crisis skyrockets**—increased suicidality, psychosis, and violence due to neurological damage and mass despair.
- **Corporate biosecurity emerges** as the wealthy push for elite-only healthcare, creating hidden networks of “clean” hospitals and restricted travel zones.
### **Political and Social Trends: Authoritarian Acceleration**
- **More states slide toward theocratic or corporatocratic governance**, as functional governance erodes.
- **Mass surveillance and AI policing expand**, using biometrics, social credit scoring, and pre-crime prediction algorithms.
- **Journalism collapses further**, with independent voices censored or deplatformed. Alternative histories and state narratives dominate.
- **Climate refugees start moving en masse**, but Western nations impose **harsh border restrictions**.
- **Localized governance gains traction**—some cities or regions experiment with quasi-autonomous models, resisting federal overreach.
### **Economic Collapse and Workforce Crisis**
- **Labor shortages intensify** due to illness and cognitive decline. Governments attempt to force retirees back into work.
- **Companies automate aggressively**—corporate adoption of AI and robotics skyrockets, eliminating human jobs where possible.
- **Insurance industries fail**, as payouts for chronic illness, disability, and cognitive decline become unsustainable.
- **Housing crisis worsens** as real estate companies use AI-powered eviction tools to push the sick and disabled into homelessness.
- **Black markets flourish** for clean air, advanced healthcare, and alternative supply chains.
2028–2030: The Threshold of Collapse
Public Health: The Great Cognitive Decline**
- **General intelligence scores plummet** as more people experience repeated viral assaults on the brain.
- **Mass mobility impairment becomes common**, as post-viral conditions lead to muscle deterioration, POTS, and autonomic dysfunction.
- **Fertility rates collapse further**, with governments secretly panicking about long-term depopulation.
**Political Shifts: The Rise of Neo-Feudalism**
- **Governments become figureheads** while mega-corporations consolidate power, essentially running society.
- **Laws shift to favor corporate citizenship**—some companies offer workers better benefits than the government.
- **Parallel societies emerge**—small networks of pandemic-aware individuals and scientific enclaves try to resist collapse.
- **AI-driven governance experiments take hold**, with some regions experimenting with AI-led decision-making over human legislators.
**Economic and Social Decay**
- **Gig work becomes the norm**, but increasingly dangerous (e.g., unregulated biohazard cleanup, AI-enforced delivery deadlines).
- **Food scarcity worsens** as climate change devastates supply chains. The ultra-wealthy shift to synthetic and lab-grown food.
- **Extreme heat zones become unlivable**, leading to massive forced migrations. Governments deploy military forces to stop migration waves.
- **Debt slavery returns**, with people essentially indentured to corporations for healthcare access.
---
## **2031–2035: The Great Bifurcation**
At this stage, we see a stark divide in possible futures. Two broad scenarios emerge:
**Scenario 1: Techno-Feudal Dystopia**
- **Governments no longer serve the public**—mega-corporations openly run society. Billionaires live in clean air zones, while the rest struggle.
- **Social mobility disappears**—if you’re not born into wealth, you are permanently stuck in a serf-like existence.
- **People work for survival, not advancement**, with basic subsistence tied to compliance.
- **AI-controlled governance and enforcement ensure mass obedience**, with predictive policing, digital ID tracking, and credit-based behavioral rewards.
- **Clean air becomes a luxury**—public spaces are infected zones, while only the elite access filtered environments.
- **Antibiotic resistance and new pandemics create an unending cycle of mass death** among lower classes.
- **Space colonization accelerates**—not for the public, but for the ultra-wealthy seeking escape.
**Scenario 2: The Great Reset (Not WEF's Version)**
- **Localized resistance movements grow**, creating independent city-states or underground networks that reject corporate governance.
- **Breakaway societies develop clean air solutions**, advanced medicine, and localized economies free from AI surveillance.
- **Public awareness of biosecurity skyrockets**—clean air, antiviral measures, and real pandemic science return to prominence.
- **Some governments collapse entirely**, while autonomous communities implement science-based survival models.
- **AI and robotics are used to decentralize, not control**, with dissident engineers and scientists building public-benefit systems.
- **A new wave of anti-corporate revolutions emerges**, possibly sparking global unrest.
--- Key Wildcards
- **Mass Awakening or Mass Psychosis?**
Will a tipping point be reached where enough people realize what has happened, or will cognitive decline and propaganda ensure continued mass amnesia?
- **Breakthroughs in Medicine or Biosecurity?**
Can a scientific rebellion occur, producing decentralized healthcare innovations that break the control of the elite?
- **AI as Liberation or Oppression?**
Will AI remain a tool of control, or will rogue developers create open-source AI systems to help people escape digital feudalism?
- **Climate Shock Events?**
A major climate disaster (superstorm, food chain collapse, runaway Arctic methane release) could accelerate all outcomes.
Final Thoughts
The next 10 years will determine whether society descends into an **AI-augmented corporate nightmare** or whether underground resistance movements spark a new renaissance of science, decentralized governance, and collective survival strategies.
The battle for **clean air, pandemic truth, and cognitive resilience** will be **THE defining struggle** of the next decade.
Oh, you know… just the usual—censorship and uncovering the highly organized, coordinated efforts to target patient-built web resources, organizations, and prominent advocates who provide inconvenient but critical information. These platforms share vital data and survival strategies to educate the public on the dangers and consequences of COVID, including Long COVID.
Ask yourself: Why is this information being suppressed?
Because if people truly understood and believed it, they would start refusing to comply with unsafe conditions—like working in person without airborne protections—and would demand much better vaccinations and public health policies.
COVID-19 may be reshaping young brains. A study of 94 college students revealed:
•40% reported ‘brain fog.’
•37% had measurable cognitive issues up to 17 months post-infection.
•Brain scans showed patterns resembling adults 40 years older.
What does this mean for brain health? 🧠
How they studied it:
Researchers used neuropsych tests and brain imaging (near-infrared spectroscopy or NIRS) to measure cognitive function and blood flow in the prefrontal cortex—key for decision-making and focus.
Findings? COVID survivors showed altered blood flow and more “brain effort” during tasks.
The cognitive issues mostly affected executive functions like task-switching and self-control.
•COVID+ students’ brain scans showed patterns similar to those of much older adults.
•Some compensated better than others, but nearly 40% showed lasting deficits.
This was up to 17 months post-infection.