Everyone who watched the Superbowl halftime show last night heard Alicia Keys hit a sour note in her opening appearance. Everyone heard it.
However, the version of the show hosted on the NFL's official YouTube page has the audio cleaned up to remove Keys's sour notes (link: ).
Bootleg clips containing the original, authentic audio are being scrubbed from YouTube at a breakneck pace.
In 5-10 years, we'll all be fighting over whether Keyes actually flubbed the opening notes of her Superbowl performance because our memories will be at odds with the “official” record.
For all the recent discussion re: the post-truth world, we need to talk more about what record-keeping should look like in the Internet era. Because things like this audio swap – with no explanation or heads up given – is crazy-making.
How are we ever supposed to return to something approximating a consensual reality when even the trivial things we experience as a nation undergo stealth edits?
Doesn't help that this was the same weekend that I showed my kids Monsters Inc. and was like, "Stick around for the credits! There's a surprise!"
…
Turn out Disney removed the blooper reel. But **I** didn't know that, so now I'm frisking my own memory, feeling like I'm nuts.
Why did they remove the bloopers? To pump up some stupid "special features" section elsewhere. Meanwhile, I'm left feeling like an insane person, swearing before God and all eternity there was a blooper reel during the end credits.
The point isn’t the blooper reel or Keys's performance (honestly, good on her for going live). The point is that the CONSTANT unannounced tweaks and edits are an unnecessary strain on our memories & recollections. Keep it up and soon people won't trust *anything* they see online.
Keep going and pretty soon they won't trust ... anything.
Just throwing this out there, but it seems really bad when any entity, let alone a mega-corporation, gets into the habit of insisting against the factual record that the thing you saw and heard didn’t actually happen the way you saw and heard it.
If they'll do it for something as trivial as one sour note during a halftime show, they'll do it for the really consequential stuff.
For it to become a matter of routine that our collective memories enter into direct conflict with the "official record” – that's one way to accelerate the demolition of a high-trust society.
Buy physical media. And, Pixar: Put the bloopers back in the credits.
PS: This isn't a giant conspiracy, btw. YouTube scrubbed = aggressive copyright enforcement. Keys edit is also industry standard. *That’s the point* Routine edits coupled with routine culling of authentic versions = normalizing conflict between “records” & collective experiences.
PPS: Also, none of this was intended as a criticism of Keys, you gigantic weirdos.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Max Boot, one of the chief purveyors of the "Russian asset" narrative, is married to an unregistered foreign agent? And she has been indicted for selling access, accepting bribes, sharing non-public info with South Korean officials, etc.?
It's even funnier when you realize Boot is a columnist specializing in "national security" specifically.
"What are all these meetings and phone calls with South Korean officials about? Also, where are all these designer handbags coming from? There are no charges on our cards. It's probably nothing. Anyway, here I go national securitizing again!"
Pulitzer Prize-winning newsrooms and pundits with six-figure salaries all “missed” the deterioration of Joe Biden’s cognitive abilities, while accounts with handles such as PatriotMom1776 and RealEagle_Freedom have been pointing it out for about five years.
“Oh, but we simply didn’t know. We were misled by masterminds such as KJP.”
Either you’re a terrible liar or you’re terrible at your job. There really isn’t an exonerating or reasonable excuse for just now noticing what has been obvious since at least the 2020 election.
And when I say there really aren’t any good excuses, I mean it. Look at this self-serving horseshit explanation from CNN.
The “It's just this war and that lying son of a bitch, Johnson!” defense.
“Woman dies after stepping into oncoming traffic during Charlottesville rally, officials say.”
You can't deny the effort to obfuscate and obscure what's happening out there, and you can't ignore that the effort is being spearheaded by the same people who scare-mongered these past 10+ years over this exact sort of thing.
The article itself notes the medical examiner has ruled the man's death a homicide. What editorial process led NBC to decide this detail was not worth mentioning in either the headline or the subhead?