Sheldon Whitehouse Profile picture
Feb 14 28 tweets 4 min read Read on X
Trump seems to be counting on the three justices he “chose” for appointment to the Supreme Court to get him out of trouble. But did Trump really choose them? Or was Trump the chump, in someone else’s game? Let’s have a look.
The justices were supposedly appointed from a “Federalist Society list” that Trump announced, saying that was the “gold standard.” But the Federalist Society has never shown the public, or admitted the existence of, any record of any report, or agenda item, or vote, on any list.
It actually wasn’t the Federalist Society’s list. So whose list was it?
Leonard Leo worked at the Federalist Society at the time, and also ran an array of front groups tasked with scheming to capture and control the Supreme Court, funded by a little crew of right-wing billionaires.
Getting the justices on the Court took money -- lots of it. And billionaires are accustomed to getting something for their money.
The Court capture operation cost over half a billion dollars. Anonymous donors wrote individual checks as big as fifteen and seventeen million dollars to pay for the ad campaigns. Maybe the same billionaire wrote all those checks.
One billionaire just set Leo up with a $1.6 billion slush fund, through a new front group. The billionaires had money and motive.
The role of Leo and the billionaires (sounds like a bad garage band) would help explain why they got away with calling it a “Federalist Society list” when it wasn’t.
A Federalist Society operative and big Federalist Society donors were involved, so the Federalist Society let it slide. And got some good publicity.
But that raises the question, who were the billionaire donors behind Leo who actually chose the justices for the list?
Start with the obvious: the Koch political operation was then the biggest political dark-money operation on the planet, and one keenly interested in packing the Court. The Kochs even brought Justice Thomas out to star at their fundraisers. So consider the Koch operation.
Look at the history. Remember how the Koch operation greeted candidate Trump? They despised him, and spent millions against him, and threatened to spend much more.
Remember how candidate Trump responded to the Koch political operation? He mocked it, and he mocked the Kochs, and he mocked the other Republican candidates who went out to Koch events to kiss the ring.
Like rival medieval principalities, House of Koch and House of Trump were at war. Until they weren’t. Suddenly, hostilities between them ceased.
By election night, David Koch was in the Trumps’ victory suite. What could explain peace breaking out between House of Trump and House of Koch? The Federalist Society list could, if it was actually a Koch list.
Imagine this truce agreement between Trump and the Koch fossil fuel barons. “You give us all your Supreme Court appointments (and while you’re at it throw in your energy and pollution regulators), and we will back off our attacks, and even support GOP field and GOTV work.”
But if you’re the Kochs, do you trust Trump with a secret deal? Of course not. So when Trump starts asking about ways to broker peace, your operatives Leonard Leo and Don McGahn cook up the “Federalist Society list” as a solution.
When Trump promised publicly to appoint from the list, that sealed the deal — and McGahn went into the White House as White House Counsel and the Kochs’ ‘inside man.’
As Court vacancies opened for Trump, he went to the “Federalist Society list,” but who chose which judges to nominate? I don’t know, but McGahn and Leo were at the center of it.
I suspect the Koch operation helped McGahn and Leo with the names, and Trump went along with their recommendations. Whether Trump knew they chose, or whether the Kochs, McGahn and Leo all played Trump like a chump, is anybody’s guess.
They even fiddled with the “Federalist Society list” along the way, to get Brett Kavanaugh on it, perhaps to help encourage Justice Kennedy’s retirement.
Kennedy liked Brett, who’d been his law clerk. If there’d been a real Federalist Society list, and someone was chosen who wasn’t on the original list, there’d have been outrage from the billionaires.
But if the deal all along was that the Kochs got to use Leo and McGahn to pick Trump’s justices for him, who would care?
All the parties to the original deal were in on the switch — a voluntary contractual amendment, if you will — so there was no complaint about it. (Nor, presumably, any corporate action by the Federalist Society about a change to its supposed list.)
With the deal now done, with the three supposed “Trump justices” perched safely on the Court, House of Koch has again declared political war against House of Trump, spending millions against him and threatening to spend more. So much for Trump and the Art of the Deal.
And so much for loyalty of the “Trump justices” being to Trump. In this scenario, Trump was the chump, not the decider.
For a final tell, look at whether Koch-funded front groups file amicus briefs when the Trump cases come up, and what the briefs say.
The best predictor of this Captured Court’s rulings is what the flotillas of billionaire-funded front groups tell the justices to do in their amicus briefs. Silence from them (or even attacks on Trump by them) will be deafening.

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Sheldon Whitehouse

Sheldon Whitehouse Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @SenWhitehouse

Apr 26
Well, the FedSoc justices pretty much disgraced themselves and their fake pet theories in yesterday’s oral argument on presidential immunity.🧵
Remember when they were “minimalists”? Yesterday they embarked on a long policy peregrination so as to make what Gorsuch called a “ruling for the ages.” (He actually said that.) Behind the stunning pomposity, it’s miles from “minimalist.”
Remember when they were “constitutionalists”? The constitution says they’ve got to stick to the “case or controversy” before them, and yet they went on their wild hypothetical wanderings. Some “constitutionalists.”
Read 13 tweets
Apr 15
More from Miami on the Florida property insurance market’s dangers.
miamiherald.com/news/politics-…
There’s considerable reason to believe that Florida is the leading edge of a general coastal property insurance problem nationwide, and considerable reason to believe that the coastal-risk insurance problem has an emerging wildfire-risk insurance twin out West.
For both coastal and wildfire risk, the trajectory is the same: insurance unaffordability, then uninsurability, then unmortgageability, leading to asset value crash, which could cascade out through the general economy.
Read 9 tweets
Mar 26
The U.S. Chamber of Commerce, its board of directors, and its climate obstruction — quite a tale: 🧵
eenews.net/articles/clima…
“For years, the [Chamber] disputed the reality of human-caused climate change and has more recently opposed meaningful efforts to address the problem.” 

“When asked for comment, the Chamber argued it’s following the wishes of corporate donors.”
So it would seem logical for Chamber board members to ask the obvious question:  “what donors?  and how much did they give you?” 
 
Is it not a massive governance failure to serve on the board of an organization without questioning where it gets its money?
Read 5 tweets
Mar 23
Leo runs what is in essence a domestic covert operation funded by creepy billionaires who want to impose their unwelcome ideology through unrepresentative courts. 🧵
politico.com/news/2024/03/2…
The spending for the covert op is somewhere above $580 million. Probably a lot above. They are not kidding around.
And it worked. They captured the Supreme Court and turned it into their political weapon, to the benefit of polluters, Republican Party, and religious extremists.
Read 5 tweets
Mar 22
“Misguided”? The model for many of these suits was litigation the U.S. Department of Justice brought and won against the tobacco industry for fraudulently misleading people about the dangerous effects of its product.   I emphasize:  and won. 🧵
thehill.com/opinion/energy…
“Misguided”? DOJ won a court order saying to the industry, in essence, “thou shalt lie no more.”  With its fraud strategy foreclosed, the industry had to change its ways. Federal tobacco policy shifted, as without lies, tobacco lobbying practices collapsed.
“Misguided”? The result was hundreds of thousands of lives saved, because DOJ back then was willing to fight a huge battle against a monster industry’s campaign of fraud, and win.  It is a shame that today’s DOJ seems unable to summon the same resolve.
Read 6 tweets
Mar 21
America is dealing with a lot of problems caused by unchecked corporate power. I’ve got a bipartisan bill to help with that. 🧵
While working people pay their fair share in taxes, giant corporations skirt their responsibilities by exploiting tax loopholes. Since the 1950s, the corporate share of national tax revenue has fallen from around 25% to just 6%.
One of these tax loopholes is found in a sneaky place: giant mergers. Record numbers of giant mergers have created an anti-competitive economic landscape for small businesses across our country.
Read 7 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us!

:(