Mike Lee Profile picture
Feb 14 7 tweets 2 min read Read on X
🧵 🚨 Update Re: FISA 702 🚨

1. Just as the House was making progress on FISA reforms, the GOP “Intel Bros”demanded that the House adjourn—without reforming FISA 702 or even prohibiting warrantless “backdoor” searches of American citizens under FISA 702.
2. I stand by my prediction from December: the Intel Bros will likely (1) seek another FISA 702 certification from the FISA court between now and early April, and then (2) argue that 702 operations may proceed until 2025, even if 702 expires in mid-April. They’ll rely on this language from 2018:Image
3. If they don’t rely on the above-referenced language from 2018 (passed in the middle of the night as part of a shady-as-heck spending measure, as I recall), then the Intel Bros will almost certainly push to reauthorize FISA 702 in an omnibus spending bill—a shady one, no doubt.
4. The Intel Bros must be stopped in their effort to perpetuate warrantless, backdoor searches against American citizens. FISA needs aggressive reforms. Congress must pass the Government Surveillance Reform Act (which @RonWyden and I introduced together), or something similar.
5. If you share my concerns about FISA 702 and warrantless surveillance of Americans, please share this thread and tell representatives and senators to demand aggressive FISA reforms and oppose the Intel Bros in any effort to (1) reauthorize 702, either through an omnibus or otherwise, without a warrant requirement, and (2) condemn the Intel Bros for even THINKING about using trickery to avoid any need for reauthorization until 2025.
6. The Intel Bros™️ don’t want to vote on serious reforms to FISA 702 because they are scared to death that those reforms will pass—because the American people are demanding them!
7. The Intel Bros™️ and The Firm™️ work hand in hand—to the point that it’s often hard to differentiate one from the other.

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Mike Lee

Mike Lee Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @BasedMikeLee

Feb 12
🧵 1. The Senate rules allow for unlimited debate. Yesterday afternoon the Senate approved “cloture”—a motion to end debate on the Ukraine supplemental spending measure within 30 hours. Now we are in that post-cloture debate time.
2. Because Schumer advanced the Ukraine supplemental on an unrelated piece of legislation, the Senate faces one more cloture motion to end debate at a time certain. Republicans continue to ask for amendments but are still being blocked.
3. Republicans can still stop this if they want to. They don’t have to vote for cloture tonight. The bill, as drafted, doesn’t have to pass. We can still pass germane amendments (I personally have many of them) that would at least make the bill less harmful than it is now.
Read 5 tweets
Feb 11
1. The Senate is voting right now on my motion to table the procedural device Chuck Schumer is using to prevent the Senate from considering amendments to the Ukraine bill.

I’m going to list just a few of the amendments he’s trying to kill—without even a vote.
2. Senator Rubio has an amendment to place illegal immigrants convicted of DUI into expedited removal proceedings.
3. Senator Tuberville has an amendment to end catch and release. He also has an amendment to stop categorical immigration parole.
Read 11 tweets
Jan 30
🧵 1. The FACE Act criminalizes an odd assortment of offenses, including blocking access to and vandalizing (1) abortion clinics, (2) places of worship, and (3) pregnancy centers.

How many prosecutions has Team Biden brought in the second category?

Zero. Not even one.
2. The Biden DOJ has enforced the FACE Act a few times in the second category (pregnancy centers). But cases involving pregnancy centers—which provide pregnant women with free counseling about non-abortion alternatives—remain infrequent relative to criminal acts against them.
3. As this Daily Signal article makes clear, DOJ seems to obsess over abortion access when enforcing the FACE Act, while ignoring that law’s protections for pro-life and religious institutions—even as crimes against such institutions have skyrocketed.

dailysignal.com/2023/01/24/doj…
Read 9 tweets
Jan 18
🧵 1. The federal government’s authority is quite narrow

That means most government powers “are reserved to the States respectively, or to the people”

You’d never guess that based on how D.C. spends and regulates today—far more than all 50 states combined

To what end?
2. Is what the federal government does for you of such great value that it’s worth working months out of every year just to pay your federal taxes?
3. Likewise, is what the federal government does for you of such great value that it’s worth working several additional months each year — beyond the time it takes for you to pay your federal taxes — just to pay for the cost increases that result from federal regulations?
Read 17 tweets
Jan 14
🧵 1. Those who enter the U.S. without papers and apply for asylum are supposed to be detained until their claims can be adjudicated. That doesn’t happen under Biden.
2. Biden gives them a plane ticket, a work permit, and a mild suggestion that they show up for their immigration hearing, which might take place sometime in the mid-2030s.
3. This works out nicely for the drug cartels, who make billions of dollars smuggling millions humans into the United States, turning them into indentured servants and in some cases subjecting them to sex slavery. It’s really bad for everyone outside the drug-cartel world.
Read 7 tweets
Jan 10
🧵 1. By not including @SpeakerJohnson in these border-security negotiations to give him what he needs, Senate Rs are setting up the GOP to get blamed on the border. Why exclude the Republican House Speaker?
2. This gives Biden and the Dems a massive win as soon as it gets out of the Senate (CYA on border and opportunity to hammer House Rs for not passing it) in exchange for marginal gains for Rs and the border.
3. Biden will never enforce the law and Dem AGs will litigate it to death and ensure none of it takes effect.
Read 9 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us!

:(