1. Pat is your go-to, happy-go-lucky pal with knowledge.
2. Pat stands out by offering real-time data.
3. Get the latest info, trends, and insights on various topics from Pat - breaking news, market updates, culinary trends, and travel advisories.
What Makes PAT So Special?
- Get information in Seconds
- Dynamic Content Creation
- Instant Educational Support
- Real-Time Travel and Lifestyle Planning
- Personalized Health Insights
- Efficient Translations
Everyones using ChatGPT for content writing. Meanwhile Claude is quietly outperforming it on every platform.
I switched 3 months ago and my engagement jumped 340% across all socials.
The secret isnt Claude itself. Its the 10 prompts that make it write like an actual human, not a corporate robot.
Here they are: 🧵
1. The Coffee Shop Test
Prompt:
"Write this like you're explaining it to a friend over coffee. No marketing speak. No corporate jargon. Just straight talk about [topic]. If it sounds like a LinkedIn post, rewrite it."
Claude actually gets this. ChatGPT still sounds like it's pitching a SaaS product.
2. Voice Finder
Prompt:
"Give me 5 different ways to say this same idea. Make each one sound like a different person wrote it - one cynical, one excited, one skeptical, one matter-of-fact, one surprised."
This is how I find MY voice. Pick the version that feels most natural, then Claude refines it.
After 2 years of using AI for research, I can say these tools have revolutionized my workflow.
So here are 15 prompts across Claude, Gemini, ChatGPT, and Perplexity that transformed my research (and could do the same for you):
1/ LITERATURE REVIEW → Claude Sonnet 4.5
"Analyze these 30 papers on [TOPIC]. Find contradictions, research gaps, and emerging debates. Prioritize findings that challenge consensus."
Why Claude: 200K context window = reads entire papers, not just abstracts.
2/ RESEARCH QUESTION REFINEMENT → ChatGPT 4o
"My broad interest: [TOPIC]. Generate 10 falsifiable research questions. For each: explain methodology, expected contribution, and why current literature can't answer it."
Why 4o: Extended reasoning catches scope creep and logical gaps.