Here's Tony dancing around being tested for COVID at the White House before he went to the FBI.
Then Tony B claims there were 6--sometimes 7!!!--FBI agents in the room (there were not 7 FBI agents in the room)--and all of them got his testimony wrong.
Then Tony thinks better of accusing 7 FBI agents (or even just two) of lying.
Now Tony is REALLY thinking better of accusing 7, or maybe just 2, FBI agents of lying.
It is, in fact, just a wild coinkydink Stefan Passantino is guy whom Cassidy Hutchinson said encouraged her to be less than candid, bc Passantino APPEARS to have gotten Jamie Comer to agree he won't be questioned abt meeting in ski mask with Mark Meadows Hutchinson revealed.
Then Dems ask whether Tony knows what WSJ concluded abt his claims of Joe Biden involvement in SinoHawk.
Now Tony wants to accuse WSJ of lying which, to be sure, is safer than accusing 2 real and 5 fake FBI agents of lying.
Note, I think the very good Dem staffers are as sick of Goldman as they are of Bobulinski at this point.
Tony says Mark Meadows didn't hand him anything.
Add Cassidy Hutchinson to the list of liars: 2+5 FBI agents and the WSJ.
Super duper important: Tony said the top WFO guy told him there were FBI agents in Baltimore he wanted to talk to.
He had been told abt the investigation, which was not yet public.
@threadreaderapp unroll
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Nice to start cataloging the people, like @MaryMargOlohan, who are stupid enough to take @SecRubio's false claims about what the EU fine is for seriously.
Thanks for making that clear!
Big Dick Toilet Salesman says he is stupid or a liar.
Unsurprising that Medicare fraudster @SenRickScott thinks fines for fraudulent consumer claims are censorship.
To add the confusion of the many ways Lindsey the Insurance Lawyer bolloxed her attempt to indict Jim Comey, there are actually THREE different documents.
First, what she purports is an indictment (but which was not presented to GJ in this form). Sig page looks like this.
The sig page for the doc originally docketed as the no-bill indictment looks like this (identical to what I just posted). Basically, Lindsey put the sig page from the purported indictment on the no-billed one.
Sometime later that day, someone FIXED that (the no-billed indictment) with a correct last page.
Let me try to explain how John Durham made you MAGAts all look like dumbasses.
By context, this email of 2 Russian spies talking about starting a Deep State conspiracy is July 26.
But this Russian spy report--the one you're all drooling over? Durham has, AFAIK, ALWAYS hidden the date of that. Always. 🤔 @ChuckGrassley is probably colluding with him to do so now.
But BY CONTENT, it can only have been written July 26 or later.
@ChuckGrassley Now, Durham concluded that the Bernardo emails were "compilations," which is a dodge word for "fabrication." But even if you believe the Bernardo emails are REAL, the one via which the Russian spies would have "learned" that Hillary "approved" a smear campaign was date July 27.
In a declaration filed this week, Trump's top DOGE at Treasury cited a GAO report from last year. Lots of people On Here are taking that $2.7T out of context. (And ignoring that poor Tom miscited some quotes in this paragraph, but we expect shoddy work from DOGE.)
But let's look at the GAO Report he relies on, shall we?
FIRST humiliating thing DOGE Tom didn't tell anyone is that MANY of these improper payments--the reason there was a recent spike--pertain to Trump's own COVID programs.