Here's Tony dancing around being tested for COVID at the White House before he went to the FBI.
Then Tony B claims there were 6--sometimes 7!!!--FBI agents in the room (there were not 7 FBI agents in the room)--and all of them got his testimony wrong.
Then Tony thinks better of accusing 7 FBI agents (or even just two) of lying.
Now Tony is REALLY thinking better of accusing 7, or maybe just 2, FBI agents of lying.
It is, in fact, just a wild coinkydink Stefan Passantino is guy whom Cassidy Hutchinson said encouraged her to be less than candid, bc Passantino APPEARS to have gotten Jamie Comer to agree he won't be questioned abt meeting in ski mask with Mark Meadows Hutchinson revealed.
Then Dems ask whether Tony knows what WSJ concluded abt his claims of Joe Biden involvement in SinoHawk.
Now Tony wants to accuse WSJ of lying which, to be sure, is safer than accusing 2 real and 5 fake FBI agents of lying.
Note, I think the very good Dem staffers are as sick of Goldman as they are of Bobulinski at this point.
Tony says Mark Meadows didn't hand him anything.
Add Cassidy Hutchinson to the list of liars: 2+5 FBI agents and the WSJ.
Super duper important: Tony said the top WFO guy told him there were FBI agents in Baltimore he wanted to talk to.
He had been told abt the investigation, which was not yet public.
@threadreaderapp unroll
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Here's an example of Hur doing something that the Mueller investigation--supervised for a time by Hur--did not do.
If Mueller had noted every time something shady may have been protected by A-C, it'd have been 1,000 pages long.
This is how you write 388 pages about a single 8-word utterance. A year in, we haven't gotten ANY such detail on Walt Nauta, where it's actually relevant.
Bc @jentaub kicked off yet another round of disinformation about Merrick Garland, reupping this post that explains how when people complain that Garland didn't charge the Mueller obstruction, they're doing PR for Bill Barr.
It is PUBLIC that Bill Barr spent 18 months destroying any charges that could have been filed under Biden.
It is PUBLIC that under Barr ongoing investigations into Stone, Manafort, & Erik Prince got shut down, NOT TO MENTION the $10M from Egypt Trump was suspected of getting.
So when you whinge about Garland for the damage that Barr did, you're basically joining into Barr's authoritarian project.
This is interesting coverage of the Hunter Biden warrants I got unsealed the other day. It is, unlike the Murdoch outlets, accurate. But because SOMEONE delayed the filing of the Attachments A&B, this competent reporter missed the most newsworthy bit.
That newsworthy bit is that David Weiss got a warrant to search Hunter's Apple data for gun crimes **81 days** after indicting for those crimes.
Right wingers should care as much as I do abt that scandal.
But *someone* at the DE courthouse misinformed them.
Here's my post on the four warrants -- which also reveal that David Weiss FIRST OBTAINED Hunter's iCloud data the same day as the Perfect Phone Call revealing Trump was demanding investigations of Hunter Biden was declassified.
So here's my Tl;dr on the warrants targeting Hunter Biden I got liberated yesterday.
1) Delaware still has not fully complied with Judge Noreika's order. They have not docketed the Attachments A and B that explain the scope of the most curious warrant.
2) David Weiss REALLY IS claiming, in a response that says, "oh sure, we really have been planning on charging the President's son with gun crimes for years," that they didn't think to search his texts for gun crime evidence until 81 days after indicting him.
🤪🤣😵
2a) Huh. That means if they presented any of this evidence from his texts to the grand jury that indicted him just days before the Statutes of Limitation expired, they would have come from an unlawful search.