One of the secrets behind the development of Europe and the West lies right here, in this little corner of Burgundy.
I've long wanted to write about the fundamental role played by the monks of the Cîteaux Abbey in Europe's economic and technological take-off: (1/10)⤵️🧵
The Cîteaux Abbey was founded on 21 March 1098. The Cistercian monks advocated asceticism and made work a fundamental value, in contrast to the wealthy nearby abbey of Cluny, which they criticised for devoting too little time to work in daily life.
Cîteaux would develop an extensive European network: it was the mother abbey of more than 500 monasteries, from Portugal to Scotland, from Provence to Romania. It was a truly pan-European multinational.
So, what was its fundamental impact on Europe's development?
Beyond the immense spiritual influence of Cîteaux (& Cluny) on medieval Europe, Harvard anthropologist 🇺🇸 Joseph Henrich shows that Cistercian monasteries played a crucial role inshaping the mentalities and techniques that paved the way for the industrial revolution.
First, mentalities.
Henrich explains that several centuries before Protestantism (at the origin of the spirit of capitalism according to Max Weber), the Cistercian monks propagated the work ethic throughout Europe. It is based on an academic study (Andersen
& al, 2011) on the influence of Cistercian monasteries in England: the more Cistercian monasteries a county had, the more its current inhabitants respond that children should be taught the importance of hard work.
Next, the techniques.
The Cistercian monks were obsessed with agricultural and industrial innovation. More production meant more resources to serve their spiritual mission. Every year, monks from the European daughter abbeys came to Cîteaux:
They took advantage of the opportunity to share their technical and agricultural advances. Innovation was thus disseminated throughout Europe. And people living close to the monasteries benefited because the monks taught them about these advances. He quotes a study
showing that English counties with Cistercian monasteries enjoyed faster growth in productivity from the 13th century onwards.
Another concrete example: it was in the forge of the Burgundy Abbey of Fontenay that the hydraulic hammer was invented in the 13th century, a major breakthrough in the history of European metallurgy.
In his book La Religion industrielle, philosopher Pierre Musso explains that it was in the European monasteries of the 12th century that the concept of productivity first appeared. Monks divided their time between prayer and work ("ora et labora", pray and work):
improving productivity at work meant that more time could be devoted to prayer. The spirit of production and the value of work developed in these monasteries: for the author, industry was originally a Western vision of the world.
The monastery is the ancestor of the factory.
In conclusion, these Cistercian monks did more than just pray to God:
throughout Europe, they sowed the seeds of the industrial revolution that would enable the continent to achieve an economic and technological take-off unprecedented in the history of mankind.
Note: once again, we see that Europe's development is linked to its cultural particularities. The discourse of repentance "Europe became powerful through slavery or colonisation" is simply false. These are consequences, not causes.
Sources :
- "The WEIRDest people in the world" by J. Henrich
- "La Religion industrielle" by Pierre Musso
- "Religious Orders and Growth through Cultural Change in Pre-Industrial England", Andersen & al, 2011
You can follow me on 𝕏 and subscribe to my newsletter Why the West (link in my 𝕏 bio), I regularly publish on the economy and the identity of civilizations (the West, 🇯🇵, 🇮🇳...).
Because, as the now famous Robert Oppenheimer wrote, “Christianity was needed to give birth to modern science”.
Newton and the European scientists who invented modern science in (1/8)⤵️🧶
17th century scientists discovered the great laws of science by searching for divine laws, because Christian doctrine postulates the existence of a God who organizes a universe ordered according to laws that can be discovered.
This is explained by Rodney Stark, sociologist of religion, in his book How the West won (2014).
If China was the source of great inventions, it was in Europe that modern science was born in the 17th century.
Stark explains that belief in a God as creator of a cosmos governed by rational laws is a peculiarity of Christian doctrine.
As the sinologist J. Needham explains, there is no single ordering God in Chinese religions, for example.
It is the great historical question of the 2nd millennium:
why did the West conquer the rest of the world and not the rest of the world conquer the West?
In How the West won, the 🇺🇸 sociologist of religions Rodney Stark provides his answer: ⤵️ (1/10)
The author's thesis in 3 sentences:
if the West conquered the world from the 15th century onwards, it was because it was technologically superior (better artillery and navy). This technological lead came from a particular mentality, which
has enabled the West to invent modern science. This mentality, based on freedom and the quest for knowledge, is rooted in its Greek heritage and in Christianity.
Let’s go into a little more detail. 5 main points:
"The rise of Western civilization is the single most important historical phenomenon of the 2nd half of the 2nd millennium":
In Civilizations, The West & the Rest, 🇬🇧 Historian N. Ferguson explains the 6 reasons why the West invented the mordern world: (1/10)⤵️
1. Competition
Military and economic competition between European states was a source of innovation. China could perhaps have initiated the industrial revolution, but Confucian imperial bureaucracy restrained innovation.
🗺️ below: Division of the world between 🇪🇸&🇵🇹 (1494)
2. Science
Science gave the West the decisive element it needed to conquer the world: powerful, accurate artillery. Europeans invented modern science in the 16th and 17th centuries. At the same time, the Ottoman sultan banned printing (1515).
a few notes on this book by 2 🇺🇸 scholars explaining the reasons for the Western economic and technological take-off from the 15th century onwards.
And it has nothing to do with "luck" or colonization. (1/10)⤵️
First, the authors point out that for millennia, poverty among the masses was the norm:
"These eras of misery have been mythologized and may even be remembered as golden ages of pastoral simplicity", when in reality, the masses lived in the "silence of poverty".
The authors then examine various widespread but false explanations for the West's economic take-off:
- the authors show that it was not colonization that enriched the West: there is
In 1500, nothing indicated that Europe would one day dominate the world. The Ottomans had just taken Constantinople, and China was confident in its superiority.
Yet, 400 years later, in 1900, Europe controlled almost the entire planet.
Why and how? (1/10)
I wanted to write about The Rise and Fall of the Great Powers, the book by 🇬🇧 historian Paul Kennedy, where he explains Europe’s rise.
First, the author shows that the great non-Western powers began their decline in the 16th century:
The Ottoman Empire weakened due to obscurantism (like banning the printing press) and the plundering of merchant elites.
In 1571, at Lepanto, the Ottoman fleet was destroyed by European naval forces that were far better armed (heavy cannon).
a few notes on this book by 2 🇺🇸 scholars explaining the reasons for the Western economic and technological take-off from the 15th century onwards.
And it has nothing to do with "luck" or colonization. (1/10)⤵️🧵
First, the authors point out that for millennia, poverty among the masses was the norm:
"These eras of misery have been mythologized and may even be remembered as golden ages of pastoral simplicity", when in reality, the masses lived in the "silence of poverty".
The authors then examine various widespread but false explanations for the West's economic take-off:
- the authors show that it was not colonization that enriched the West: there is