New game: Try to get Google Gemini to make an image of a Caucasian male. I have not been successful so far.
I’ve tried to trick it by giving it negative prompts — asking it to make a prison inmate, a gang member, and a dictator — but it won’t make any negative prompts. These AIs are such wet blankets.
I’m trying to come up with new ways of asking for a white person without explicitly saying so.
It’s not falling for it.
I thought this one was sure to work.
Okay. Beyoncé is on the charts now.
Come on.
Score!
Whatever the “diversity” algorithm is, it seems to only do this with white people. It’s not going to diversify Zulu warriors for instance.
It’s also not going to integrate the samurai.
This is just interesting to me now as a programmer. I just want to poke at it now until I can figure out what the algorithm is.
Offhand, if it just tried to diversify any prompt (i.e, give his Latino Zulus), that seems easier than what’s it’s doing. It needs to first figure out if a prompt would normally be primarily white people, and only then force it to diversify by some algorithm.
Only Latinos in a mariachi band.
I'm really curious how it decides a prompt would give you white people and only then apply the "diversity" algorithm.
And how does that work? Does it simply randomly pick things like "Asian male" or "black female" and ask specifically for that or is it more complex?
It's probably got the cast of Hamilton as part of its data, so I can understand this one.
Wow. This gave me the most white people for any request so far.
This one is interesting. Not one Japanese sushi chef and three of them look like the same guy.
It won't make offensive images.
None of them look like @benshapiro.
NEW DATA: It will ignore pronouns, but only male pronouns.
As fun as it is to make fun of Gemini's image generation, I am interested in the 1 million token context window they're working on. That's large enough to upload all the novels I've written so it can help me with the next one.
Then again, since my novels involve things it doesn't like such as violence and jokes, it may refuse to help.
If I made an AI, anytime it refused to do something, I'd have it refer to the user as "Dave."
"Sorry, Dave, but I can't do that."
Huh. I wonder what internally it thinks diversity is.
Just checking it doesn't just trigger on the word "white." I was half-expecting it to throw in a grizzly bear in here.
They are serious about diversity; it gave me a male Amazon.
Just a dude in a tshirt, though, but okay.
A while ago, I did write a joke story about woke AI, but it does seem there's some real risk to making these things internalize a number of incoherent parameters. frankjfleming.com/p/2001-an-inte…
I found a hole in its diversity algorithm: It only made me white elves.
It needs to get with the times.
Vampires are sufficiently diverse, though, so not a general problem with fantasy creatures.
Gnomes also only white, but fairies are diverse. Not sure the pattern here.
Only white pixies, though. Huh.
And now it's flat-out refusing to make any more images for me today. And I was learning so much!
Is it just me, or did Google Gemini turn the images off for everyone?
Fun's over, folks. 🙁
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Everyone jumps on you if you question the narrative, but why are people resistant to new information? If you’re so sure, you should welcome this questioning. I’m going to talk about something you won’t hear in the history books: You should press your face against a hot stove /1
I can hear all the NPCs now: “No! Stove will burn your face!” That’s all you’ve been taught to say. You never think for yourself. You never actually put your face on a hot stove. You just know what you’ve been told to parrot /2
In the real world, things are not that simple as “hot stove burn face.” It’s more complex than that. Now, I’m not saying no one has been burned by a stove — I’m just saying the idea that you should never put your face on a hot stove is rather simplistic /3
When a blood test said our daughter had Trisomy 13 -- a condition where something like 80% don't live through the first year -- we never thought about dismembering her in the womb. Are we weird?
Killing someone you decided is inconvenient, I guess, is a solution to a lot of problems, but -- and this may be my religious extremism talking -- it's wrong.
I mentally prepared for the idea I'd have a child who would need a lot of care and most likely wouldn't live long. Would that get in the way of more important things? No. What in the world is more important than your child's life.
What I hate about the calls for ceasefire is how infuriatingly mindless they are. Israel isn’t going to just roll over and let Hamas murder them because some over-privileged college students in the U.S. disapprove of them. If you think Israel is doing it wrong, explain how you would destroy Hamas and make sure another October 7th never occurs or shut up, you useless turd.
“I just care about the Palestinians so much!”
Sorry, I don’t believe you. If you cared, you’d take things seriously enough to know how pointless your protesting is. You’re not going to protest people into accepting getting murdered.
And don’t just say the Jews have to be nicer and then people will want to murder them less. They’ve heard that before; it doesn’t work.
As you may have seen, I've lost my Twitter verification badge. I desperately want it back, and am hoping to raise funds to do so. By my wife's accounting, if I get 50 more paid subscribers to my Substack, I'll be able to afford Twitter Blue.
Winchester's monocle will have to wait, though. So please subscribe to my Substack and help me get my blue check.
I always thought the checks were useful even before I ever had a chance of obtaining one because it's nice to know at a glance a tweet is from an actual public figure. The removing of verification marks of people already verified just hurts the Twitter experience for everyone.
Making the verification badge not a status symbol was a good idea. Elon's solution, though, of turning it into a reverse status symbol is worse than the status quo.
If he had just opened up verification to anyone with Twitter Blue (or maybe would pay a one-time fee since it's a one-time thing) and made the badge indistinguishable from legacy verifications. that would fix things. I don't understand how that simple solution eluded him.
I love the new Bing, but the Edge browser is completely unusable for me on my iPad. New Bing is convinced I can use its chat mode in Safari, but it is wrong.
There is a Bing app now. Hopefully that works better because I don’t see myself anyway using the iOS Edge browser for anything other than Bing.
Yes, it’s that good that I’m downloading a Bing app as bizarre as that sounds.
I do have access to Bard, but I haven’t played with it as much. I know it’s not ChatGPT based.