Over the past few mos I've repeatedly commented on Bosnia & Herzegovina's ability to provide critically needed 155mm shells, & other munitions, for Ukraine. There is a great opportunity here for the West to shift the tide of battle vs. Russia. Let me explain the details. 🧵
BiH's remarkably robust defense industry dates to the Yugoslav period. On the eve of the SFRJ's dissolution (1990/91), BiH was by some estimates producing cc 51% of all arms & munitions in Yugoslavia, which then had the 4th largest armed forces in Europe (the JNA).
While most the relevant plants were heavily damaged during the aggression vs BiH by Serbia & Croatia (1992-95), the sector was also relatively quick to bounce back. Without getting into the weeds, suffice it to say by the mid-2010s, BiH's defense industry was on its legs again.
As of 2022, for instance, BiH is exporting arms & munitions to some 113 countries, to the tune of tens of millions of $ per year. Purchasers of BiH's arms & munitions incl the US, large segments of NATO, but also large numbers of Asian & African states. klix.ba/biznis/privred…
BiH's engineers have also begun designing & producing their own drones, which I suspect will be produced in still greater numbers for both domestic & international purposes in the next few yrs. In short, the manufacturing know-how is there. klix.ba/biznis/na-sajm…
For Ukraine's purposes, most significant BiH defense firms likely BNT, Pretis, Unis Ginex, BINAS, Igman. First 4 produce artillery shells & components & can or already do produce the critically needed 155mm shells. Igman primarily produces small arms munitions & grenades.
Now, we know some Bosnian munitions/arms are already in UA. It's been reported in the local media, the NYT, pics & footage occasionally pop up on social media etc. The problem is BiH cannot directly sell to UA, so all of this is arriving thru back-channels in unknown quantities.
BiH can't sell directly to UA bc in 2015, Bosnian Serb secessionists - at Russia & Serbia's insistence - managed to secure a ban. They pulled that off bc of BiH's convoluted, Dayton Peace Agreement-ensconced constitution. So 1:1 sales are no-go (for now). reuters.com/article/uk-ukr…
But there are ways around this, as evidenced by the presence of BiH munitions & arms in UA already. What's needed is for NATO countries to strike contracts w/ the relevant defense firms in BiH on behalf of UA (as the Czechs appear to have recognized) & increase output.
While Serb & Croat anti-state elements in BiH may attempt to obstruct this, they cannot tear up existing export agreements unliterally & all of the above companies are located in the FBiH entity so there are myriad avenues to avoid Serb secessionist meddling in export process.
So for modest FDI into BiH's defense industry (cc $100-500 million) - which would incl modernization of equipment & streamlining of supply chains - BiH could quickly be producing hundreds if not thousands of 155mm shells for UA per day, shipped via existing legal channels.
And of course keep in mind that labor costs in BiH are a fraction of what they are in the rest of Europe. Yes, France can produce these shells too. But they're not. And even if/when they do, it'll cost 10x what it would to do so in BiH, even w/ (temporarily) worse logistics.
These BiH-made shells would then be bought by NATO govts thru existing export deals & dispatched to UA, thus circumventing the realistically minor issue of the 2015 export ban. It's already happening, as we can see. It's just a practice that needs to be brought up to scale.
This would massively benefit UA, first & foremost, it would aid NATO's strategic interests in countering Russia's aggression, but it would also help elevate domestic manufacturing while also shoring up the domestic defense capacities of BiH itself. The rare triple W.
The security of the entire Euro-Atlantic community is at stake in Ukraine. Far too much time & blood has already been wasted on navel-gazing & whataboutism. We all need UA to win. The means are there, in this case in BiH, to deliver victory. We just need the will to act. /xxx
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
As Bosnian Serb extremist Dodik again insists he intends to take the RS entity out BiH (while still somehow magically respecting the Dayton Agreement) a familiar, bad faith chorus has struck up: why can Kosovo secede from Serbia but the RS not from BiH?
WARNING: VERY LONG 🧵
Let's define our terms: "can" in international relations is a Q of power, not international law (i.e. the is/ought problem, in short). The US & China can do a lot of things bc they are super powers; Burkina Faso & Honduras cannot bc they are small, poor, & weak.
Kosovo was able to declare independence in 2008 bc the balance of power, regionally & internationally, favored its ability to do so & it enjoyed (begrudging but nevertheless significant) support for the same. It failed to win UN recognition but like Taiwan...
Bosnian Serb extremist Dodik makes some of his clearest threats of secessionist yet, saying if @OHR_BiH imposes new state property law "at 5, at 11 we declare independence." A few things worth unpacking here as they involve both BiH & EU dynamics. 🧵klix.ba/vijesti/bih/ot…
Dodik's hysterics confirm what I wrote about yesterday: @OHR_BiH is preparing a new state property law, and his threats clearly suggest he's looking for a still better division of spoils than what may nominally be on the table. Schmidt will concede if so.
Dodik also makes explicit reference to a nightmare scenario vis @euforbih I've warned about for nearly 2yrs: saying in secession scenario he expects them merely to stand along the inter-entity boundary line "and prevent contact". EUFOR as UNPROFOR in essence.
Deeply alarming revelation from the U.S. concerning a significant arms buildup by Serbia along the Kosovo border. It is vital now that the Biden admin not double-back on the clarity w/ which it appears finally to be seeing Vucic. He is a threat to be countered, not appeased.
As someone who was optimistic about Biden in 2020 & what I anticipated his regional policies to be, to deep disillusionment w/ his admin's actual approach to the WB, this is a much improved, realistic tone from the NSC. More needed, as per my txt below.x.com/JasminMuj/stat…
Obviously, security and defense personnel in Sarajevo should also raise their preparedness level too. The prospects of renewed Serbian military action in Kosovo - although unlikely, IMO - also significantly raises the prospects of Dodik pushing ahead w/ a real secession attempt.
While we still puzzle out the exact facts of the Serb nationalist paramilitary attack in Kosovo, it's worth recalling that the Serbian security apparatus has been using proxy & criminal groups to initiate violence since the 90s, the original plans for which date to the 80s.🧵
The clearest articulation of this strategy was the RAM Plan (aka Rampart-91) developed by the Belgrade's military & intel leadership, under Milosevic's direction, which envisioned a scheme for distributing arms & seizing territories in Croatia & Bosnia via local proxies.
RAM included an almost perversely scientific approach as to how atrocities - incl killings, torture, sexual violence - could be used to eliminate the non-Serb population of these areas, w/ a particular focus on the extermination of the Bosniak ("Muslim") ppl of Bosnia.
Let me explain explicitly why yesterday's attack by Serb nationalist militants in Kosovo must lead to a categorical reorganization of the EU and US posture towards Serbia. Especially for those who do not follow W. Balkans politics. 🧵
First, there are two primary theories for how the attack happened: i. it was a rogue grp of local militants & criminals who decided to take up arms vs. the Kosovo state; ii. it was an operation by Serbian state security working (in)directly on the orders of the Belgrade regime.
Technically, there are an infinite number of variations on each possibility - who knew what, when, exact motives etc - but these are the broad contours. But regardless of which is determined to be the case, both mean a categorical failure of current EU/US policy in the region.
No Q the U.S. has, historically, undertaken the most credible steps twd constitutional reform in BiH. But U.S. is also the architect of the Dayton constitution & as recently as Oct 2022 & April 2023 explicitly supported (FBiH) constitutional changes by the @OHR_BiH which…
…deepened the sectarian discrimination now almost entirely dismantled by the ECHR. And all signs point to the Court explicitly striking down the @OHR_BiH’s U.S. backed impositions before the yr’s end too.
America’s actual friends warned this admin not to pursue this course.
But we were ignored or lambasted as idealists (or worse). Now we have what I called throughout 2021/22 “the worst of all world’s” w/ Western officials: the ECHR not just striking down political pacts form three decades ago but current Western & specifically U.S. policies.