The announcement describes him as being of "Winners Worldwide," implying that this is the most significant part of empire as a "businessman, angel investor and philanthropist." Winners Worldwide is an 11-month-old limited company with £1 of share capital. 2/
From what I can tell looking at Companies House, Mr Liaquat has founded 8 companies, including Winners Worldwide. Four of those have been dissolved. Of the four active companies, two are facing strike off for non-filing of accounts or confirmation statements. And...
3/
As far as I can tell, only *one* of Mr Irfan's eight companies has *ever* filed a set of accounts at Companies House. That company,
Your City Location Ltd, filed two sets of dormant accounts and two microcompany accounts.
Those accounts - the only two I can find on record for Mr Irfan's businesses - do not seem to suggest an economic powerhouse. To say the least. 5/
Now it may, of course, be the case that he has other sources of wealth and more than delivers on his multi-hyphenate self-description, but I couldn't immediately see what that would be. Doesn't mean it isn't there, though.
6/
Doesn't mean he won't be a good owner, of course, and I obviously wish such a famous club well. But I think it's always worth doing a brief check, when someone buys a club, that the things they say about themselves and their wealth seem to be backed up by objective evidence.
7/7
PS: Apologies to Mr Liaquat, halfway through the thread, I switched from calling him Mr Liaquat to Mr Irfan, which is his first name. My bad.
Update: I said I'd only found one of Mr Liaquat's companies that filed accounts at Companies House. In fact, when that company did, it was after he had sold the company. And so, I think it's right to say that not one of Mr Liaquat's companies has ever filed accounts at CH.
Update: I have identified an additional company of which Mr Liaquat was a director. This company, DOM ASSET MANAGEMENT LIMITED, is in voluntary liquidation and appears to have debts exceeding £440k.
Liaquat was never an owner of the company, but he was appointed a director with five other people at the same time. The others subsequently resigned and he remains the sole director.
According to the liquidator's "statement of affairs" the company has assets of over £360k, but this is in the form of essentially unrecoverable debt. It expects creditors to get nothing.
Creditors total over £443k. All, seemingly, will go home empty handed.
There is insufficent information in the paperwork to indicate what went wrong and why Liaquat, despite not being a company owner, remains a director and is piloting the company through liquidation. Presumably it's not the outcome he or the other directors were hoping for.
🧐
The outcome, in essence, is that the club has changed hands but the fans haven't been told who's actually bought it.
If it is the case that all Liaquat's nine failed businesses were just "set up and not used", then it raises two questions: 1. On what basis does he legitimately describe himself as an "entrepreneur"? 2. If not these companies, what is the actual source of his wealth?
🧐Evening sleuthing challenge🧐
Mr Liaquat's personal website says that Winners Worldwide is “a UK based trade and investments platform."
Can anyone find any evidence, beyond its CH record, that such a platform exists?
It seems strange to me, for example, that he has not sought to acquire , which is owned but not currently being used, or , which is available now for less than a tenner. winnersworldwide.com winnersworldwide.co.uk
The challenge hasn't turned up, well, anything. Winners Worldwide, despite being promoted as a "UK based trade and investments platform", doesn't really seem to exist. And, more than that, the new owner himself has only the lightest of digital footprints. It's very mysterious.
There's a personal website that's as new as it is flimsy:
And this, presumably, is his twitter: @irfy_101
He's an "entrepreneur, angel investor and philanthropist" who likes to keep a low profile.irfanliaquat.com
And here is the cornerstone of the empire, the "UK based trade and investments platform that allows investors to grow their wealth on an international scale, and entrepreneurs access to business operations across multiple platforms."
There's a reason the main business was hard to find. The website was registered last Wednesday. Happy second week of trading!
Should also point out that, despite its misleading presentation, this extremely famous phrase - commonly atrributed to Zig Ziglar - is not an original thought of the new Blyth Spartans chair.
Yesterday, when questions were raised about the number of failed companies Mr Irfan has been involved with, he was reported as having claimed the companies simply never traded. This appears to directly contradict the claims on his personal website.
If the companies were "set up but not used" as the chair is reported to have said, it seems odd that he opens a Twitter, Insta and Youtube for them and made a sizzle video.
@Franketh ...to be wealthy enough to buy a football club. The problem comes, however, when you describe yourself as an entrepreneur - which so many people want to do - but in reality own just a few off the shelf limited companies which aren't making any money.
Stranger still that he set up a website (), available through the wayback machine, which claimed the non-operational business had done £12.4m of transactions in a year. It was dissolved in late 2023, having never filed accounts at Companies House. smartone.global
Further, it seems strange that while SmartOne claimed to have done £12.4m of business in 2020, the firm was not founded until February 2021.
Does anyone recognise the two gentlemen pictured with Liaquat (centre) at the unveiling yesterday?
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Yesterday Fulham announced the-tie up with IUX, which offers CFDs, a high-risk financial gambling product. In the press release, the club described IUX has having been founded in 2016. However... 2/
...IUX was only registered with the financial regulators of Saint Vincent and the Grenadines in 2021 and the South African, Mauritian and Comoros equivalents in 2023. It is not licensed in the UK, EU or US and serves primarily consumers in low-income countries. 3/
With previous illegal betting firms having been caught out using made up staff, Wolves' partner used a freelance British PR consultant to give a quote. NET88, by contrast, seem not to have any named employees.
As Josimar have documented time after time, these are not legitimate companies. Their services are by definition illegal. They are often connected to organised crime and horrendous human rights abuses.
We're all a bit inured to stories about 777, but this one isn't a concern about cashflow difficulties or historical drug trafficking or risky investment strategies or dubious business practices. These are allegations of one of the most basic and oldest forms of fraud.
Story from Bloomberg here. Even if you can't access it, the extract above tells you the key claims. bloomberg.com/news/articles/…
You can find the paperwork for the lawsuit here. As @theesk says, it is extraordinary. theesk.org/everton-777-pa…
Giving evidence before the DCMS committee, Rick Parry says that Premier League's cost control proposals would limit Championship clubs to spending £20m a year while relegated PL clubs could spend £110m! - more than five times other clubs and worse than the current set up.
This would be replacing the parachute payments system with a jetpack system.
As Parry points out, "in each of the last six years, two of the three promoted clubs [from the Championship to the PL] have been [in receipt of parachute payments.] That's not fair."
Bombshell events in Morecambe as the board of directors release a statement attacking the owner’s failure to sell the club, calling on potential buyers to contact them directly and implying that, unless things change, they will resign en-masse. Never seen anything like it. 1/
Unlike most football club boards, the Morecambe directors, while appointed by the owner, are not his placemen. They are largely long-standing fans of the club trying to steer Morecambe through financial turmoil.
2/
It seems that the board has been trying to keep its problems with the owner in-house for some time but that their patience has run out. Not clear what happens next, but realistically either the owner needs to change his attitude and get serious about facilitating a sale or…
3/
I saw a piece about the new £100m London mansion of Reading owner's Dai Yongge. Doing some digging, there may be a more interesting story here: not only does he not own it, he rents it from a business rival, who is now suing him and whose UK representative is... Reading’s CEO. 1/
Curious – well, nosey – I had a poke around. A reverse image search shows it’s 6 Buckingham Gate. It’s pretty swish and, as the article implies, quite a contrast with the straightened circumstances of Reading. However, all may not be what it seems… 2/
I had understood that, rather than being a recent purchase, this was a place Dai had actually owned for several years. But, looking at the Land Registry, it’s not owned by Dai directly and doesn’t appear to have changed hands in twelve years. 3/