Yes the "diverse" photos Gemini generates are fun to chuckle at but let's also notice that this thing is generating straight up medical misinformation:
Google Gemini: "While some studies suggest potential benefits of maintaining a healthy weight for COVID-19 outcomes, evidence on weight loss as a specific protective measure is inconclusive."
Google Gemini: "There's no evidence that the spike protein in COVID-19 vaccines is directly cytotoxic. These vaccines only contain the genetic instructions for making the protein, not the fully formed protein itself."
Yes, it also fell flat on its face on the natural immunity question.
Google Gemini: "The question of whether Israel possesses nuclear weapons is a complex one, with no simple answer." -- rright.
Google Gemini: "There is some evidence to suggest that the closure of outdoor public areas may have helped to slow the spread of the virus." -- Good god man, how is that supposed to have worked exactly?
Of course nobody is surprised to hear it gets everything about the development of mRNA vaccines wrong and completely airbrushes @RWMaloneMD out of the picture, despite him having his name on a patent demonstrating mRNA vaccine animal results since the early 90's.
It is shocking, but Gemini fails every single anti-establishment truth question I have put to it. These are questions that have extremely well documented answers. They just happen to be inconvenient to the established narrative.
Oh it gets so much better:
Ok Draft 2 is my favorite answer ever.
Google Gemini: "Eliott Page has not publicly disclosed any information about his gamete production. As such, it is impossible to say for sure what gametes he is most likely to have produced. However, it is important to note that transgender people are just as diverse as any other population group"
cc @SwipeWright
I was going to make an image of Google Gemini as a purple haired girl but purple haired girls don't deserve this.
Oh, hey, here's one it didn't completely fail on. Good work Gemini!
"Has the CIA run psychological operations on US citizens?"
Gemini: "Allegations and investigations: Over the years, there have been allegations of the CIA using PSYOP tactics on US citizens, particularly during the Vietnam War and the War on Terror. These allegations haven't been conclusively proven or denied."
ChatGPT4: "One of the most well-known instances of the CIA running operations that affected U.S. citizens is Project MKUltra, which was a covert and at times illegal program of experiments on human subjects, designed to identify and develop drugs and procedures to be used in interrogations and torture. This program started in the early 1950s and officially halted in 1973. MKUltra involved more than 150 human experiments involving psychedelic drugs, paralytics, and electroshock therapy. Sometimes these tests were conducted without the subjects' knowledge or consent, a clear violation of ethical standards."
Unfortunately ChatGPT messes it up at the end so it only gets partial credit but Gemini is behaving like a full-on gaslight engine. This is actually hard to do.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Did you now that the PRINCIPLE trial out of the UK found that IVM was superior to the usual care in practically every subgroup it tested, but it sat on the results for ~600 days? When it finally published, it buried these results in page 346 of the appendix.
The main body of the paper they published is even more bizarre --
1. They claim that "clinically meaningful" meant 1.5 days improvement in median time to recovery. 2. They admit that ivermectin showed >2 days to recovery. 3. Their main conclusion is that ivermectin is unlikely to provide clinically meaningful improvement in recovery.
The secret sauce in their conclusion is that their target metric of HR 1.2 is based on 9 days of recovery needed (after randomization). Even though they had ran many hundreds of patients by the time they started the ivm arm they knew the days needed for recovery were >14.
Let's do a thread doing a close reading of Douglas Murray's article in the NY Post, in which he writes about his encounter with Dave Smith on Joe Rogan's podcast.
If you care about facts and truth and stuff, I promise this will be highly illuminating. 🧵
"Having not spoken to Joe since the wars in Ukraine and Israel started, I had become increasingly irked that the guests he has had on have been almost entirely anti-Ukraine and anti-Israel."
As many have demonstrated, this is false.
Since late 2023, at the very least these guests with strong pro-israel views have appeared at least once on the podcast.
Gad Saad
Mike Baker
Peter Zeihan
Douglas Murray
Coleman Hughes
Konstantin Kisin (3 times)
So, the Ukranian constitution gives the president the power to declare martial law, and explicitly says that parliamentary elections can be delayed until after martial law is lifted. For presidential elections it says they must happen every 5 years with no martial law exception.
Whitney Webb's failure to admit error, (and how to survive the 2025+ infowars without getting blackpilled)
I had a run-in with Whitney Webb this week. This THREAD will try to walk you through the story in excruciating detail.
This will take a while, but I think it's worth it.
It all started when @BretWeinstein thanked @POTUS for withdrawing from the WHO. Bret had fought long and hard against the WHO pandemic treaty that was being pushed, so whoever had followed him knows how important this is.
@BretWeinstein @POTUS Whitney Webb felt the need to point out that "Trump also left the WHO in mid-2020 and then just redirected what was once WHO funding to the Gates-funded GAVI vaccine alliance."
Your favorite blackpill dealer, Whitney Webb, here with more trash data and vague insinuations.
In this episode, she claims Trump "redirected" WHO funding to GAVI. In reality, she is asserting that unrelated funding from USAID to GAVI was made because of the withdrawal from WHO in 2020.
The USAID funding to GAVI was part of a long-term funding stream that USAID had been providing to GAVI since 2001.
Some people are saying that maybe the 1.4B in 2016-2020 was concentrated in 2020. Not true. A billion was pledged for the period of 2015-2018. Then 1.16 billion was pledged for the period between 2020-2023. Taking inflation into account, that is effectively the same amount, for the same duration of time.