1/ 2024 is shaping up to be a bit of a year of the Leopard, a brief summary of plans afoot to make even more Leopard 2 users and variants a reality, which is always a good thing.
An open-ended, non-exhaustive list of actual & speculative users going on as of February 2024:
2/ 🇮🇹 Italy: Leopard 2A8
The Italians are looking at a medium-term successor to the Ariete (pictured), despite that tank still being in the midst of an MLU, with long term aspirations to join MGCS (or whatever emerges when it finally gives up).
3/ They plan to do a lot of the work domestically, building at a Leonardo production line in La Spezia and fitting with Italian industry components including sights, radios, C2 suite and potentially domestic manufactured barrel for L55A1 gun.
Anticipated production run: 130x 2A8.
4/ 🇱🇹 Lithuania: Leopard 2A7/2A8
Lithuania is after a modest batch of 2A7 or 2A8 standard Leopard 2, adding a punchier capability to its Army that currently has nothing heavier than the Vilkas Boxer IFV fleet.
5/ Selection was based on a few variables including value of the LEOBEN user community for collaborative support and cost sharing, that they already operate German AFVs and have good arrangements for support, as well as fast delivery.
Anticipated production run: 50x tanks.
6/ 🇨🇿 Czechia: Leopard 2A7, 2A4, ARV
14x 2A4 and a Buffel ARV requested to get moving with the platform, meanwhile negotiations in progress to possibly order new 2A7 or 2A8-series tanks.
Anticipated Production run: c.50x 2A7.
7/ 🇭🇺 Hungary: Leopard 2A7HU, 2A4, AVLB, ARV
Deliveries are underway and first vehicles are in user's hands, arriving alongside a sizeable 209-vehicle order for KF-41 Lynx IFVs. It also has a natty camouflage to differentiate nicely from all the other 2A7 knocking about.
8/ The 2A7HU are replacing legacy T-72 tanks obtained from the Soviet Union, though only c.30 T-72M1 remain in service with 130 more optimistically described as in reserve.
Production run: 44x 2A7HU, with second hand vehicles: 12x 2A4, 9x AVLB and 9x Buffel
9/ 🇳🇴 Norway: Leopard 2A8NO
Ordered in 2023 as 2A7NO but later upgraded the order to 2A8NOs, selected over the K2NO in competitive tender, Norway’s newest Leopards will replace 28 rather old 2A4NO that are well past their best.
Production run: 54 2A8NO + option for 18 more
10/ 🇸🇰 Slovakia: Leopard 2A8
Slovakia bought 15 2A4 in 2022, all of which have been delivered, and are now showing interest in new build 2A8 to significantly uplift their capabilities.
Production run: 45-50 2A8.
11/ 🇪🇸 Spain: Leopardo 2E M2/M2+
Spain operates a mixed fleet of 2A4 and 2E (the latter a 2A6 derivative), and are looking at a pathway to upgrade to a 2A7/2A8 analogue called the 2E M2+.
12/ Previous twitter thread on this upgrade plan:
Production run: not stated yet, likely in the 50-120 range.
13/ 🇭🇷 Croatia: Leopard 2A8
Possible replacement for the very old M-84, reportedly in competition with K2 and possibly Leclerc XLR.
Production run: not stated yet, likely c.50.
14/ 🇬🇷 Greece: Leopard 2A7HEL
Discussions underway to upgrade a sizeable portion of the 170x 2HEL (2A6 analogue) to the 2A7 standard, doubtless this would be uplifted to 2A8 in any contractual agreement that may emerge.
Production run: not stated yet, likely in the 120-150 range.
15/ 🇩🇪 Germany: Leopard 2A7V/2A7A1/2A8
A sizeable upgrade was completed in late 2023 to deliver 104x 2A7V, upgraded from a mix of 2A4/2A6-derivatives/2A7 (obtained from the Dutch). 2A7A1 was then developed, featuring Trophy integration...
16/ ..., and in 2023 a (first?) batch of 18 2A8 with option for 105 more was placed.
Production run: 104x 2A7V, 17x 2A7A1, 18x 2A8
17/ 🇵🇱 Poland: Leopard 2A4, 2A5, 2PL
As part of the most eclectic tank fleet in the world, Poland ordered a range of Leopard 2 from 2002 with as-is tanks and a bespoke national configuration, the 2PL. They've also bought Abrams, ordered K2 and have a myriad of old T-72 and PT-91s
Long term Poland plans to settle on fewer tank types, operating twin fleets of US-sourced M1 Abrams and Korean K2PL, eventually retiring the Leopard 2 fleets.
Production run: 86x 2A4, 105x 2A5, 62x 2PL
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
(Part 2) It started as a thread on the UK's Titan AVLB and Project TYRO, but got so unwieldy I’ve made it a mini series. What is Titan and TYRO; why is it one of, if not the, most important requirements in the British Army (or any army); and why is it a critical requirement?
I’ve broken into a few parts; (1) What is Titan and Project TYRO; (2) Why is combat bridging important anyway; (3) Why is Titan a serious problem area; (4) Whats the plan for TYRO CSB; and (5) What are the other options and the implications?
So, Part 2 – Why is combat bridging important anyway?
The UK was the birthplace of the tank and though today it has only a single upgrade programme to show for heavy tracked armour, it was the origin of many key technologies and capabilities used by tanks the world over. A🧵of a few highlights of the glory days of British armour R&D
The first practical gas turbine powered vehicle, the FV200 Turbine Test Vehicle, a Conqueror. 'Practical' is a caveat - the Germans actually had the first gas turbine tank, a Jagdtiger in WW2, but it had a problematic habit of setting trees and other nearby objects on fire.
FV4211 (initially the Chieftain Mk5/2), an all-aluminium tank that was the first with composite armour, initially called Burlington but renamed to Chobham, based around the concept of composite materials under permanent compression, laid in a matrix with additional materials...
(1/n) A neat bit of thermal footage of Challenger 2 firing and driving. A couple of obvious takeaway comments on tank heat signatures:
Engine is peak sustained source of heat, particularly once underway & exhaust blooms. Its at the rear which is good for classic head on engagements, but modern all-aspect attacks mean its increasingly a concern that you can't do much to mitigate. (cgi image but representative)
Barrel once fired is a big hot spot from the front. One part of the reason for these trendy shrouds we see on concept AFV is to limit that signature (and thus far has been dismissed as until you shoot barracuda coverings are good enough, and once you have who cares anymore)
Some fervent discussion about KF51 in one of my tweets yesterday, a quick thread on the 130 mm main gun and its ammunition handling system in the KF51 concept vehicle to answer some of the question that came up.
Reminder this is a prototype vehicle still and everything is in active development and would be subject to user requirements if it gets bought by anyone. Notional data follows.
Main weapon is Rheinmetall’s new (though its almost 10 years old already – development started in 2015) 130 mm L51 smoothbore gun, often referred to as the Future Gun System (FGS).
80 years since D-Day, so I thought a (rather long, it turns out) thread of the various interesting AFV things that were around that day, and a bit of a look at what they have evolved to today as spiritual successors. #tanktwitter #dday80 #tanks
Specialist AFV are ubiquitous now, but the D-Day landings were some of the first outings for many of these capabilities or at the least cemented their utility upon which several generations have evolved since.
Actually getting onto the beach is itself a challenge, as double-digit tonne AFV are not inherently seagoing things (aside dedicated amphibians).
A brief summary🧵of the Manned Ground Vehicle (MGV) element of the aspirational US Army Future Combat Systems (FCS) programme. A bit of a "what they almost got" for the US Army of the late 90s and early 00s.
MGV was a common family of AFV that were bold in their vision - baseline 24 ton hull (later upped to c.30t) with hybrid drive & CRT track, loads of data & sensor fusion, a lot of automation (most variants were 2-man crews), with less passive armour and more smart solutions.
A few more details of the core base platform that the family would build on. Lots of bold capabilities that many 2020s AFV still lack, and all with the strategic benefits of a single common platform across an entire Army fleet, which are substantial.