Jon Hawkes Profile picture
Feb 23 18 tweets 6 min read Read on X
1/ 2024 is shaping up to be a bit of a year of the Leopard, a brief summary of plans afoot to make even more Leopard 2 users and variants a reality, which is always a good thing.
An open-ended, non-exhaustive list of actual & speculative users going on as of February 2024: Image
2/ 🇮🇹 Italy: Leopard 2A8
The Italians are looking at a medium-term successor to the Ariete (pictured), despite that tank still being in the midst of an MLU, with long term aspirations to join MGCS (or whatever emerges when it finally gives up). Image
3/ They plan to do a lot of the work domestically, building at a Leonardo production line in La Spezia and fitting with Italian industry components including sights, radios, C2 suite and potentially domestic manufactured barrel for L55A1 gun.
Anticipated production run: 130x 2A8.
4/ 🇱🇹 Lithuania: Leopard 2A7/2A8
Lithuania is after a modest batch of 2A7 or 2A8 standard Leopard 2, adding a punchier capability to its Army that currently has nothing heavier than the Vilkas Boxer IFV fleet. Image
5/ Selection was based on a few variables including value of the LEOBEN user community for collaborative support and cost sharing, that they already operate German AFVs and have good arrangements for support, as well as fast delivery.
Anticipated production run: 50x tanks.
6/ 🇨🇿 Czechia: Leopard 2A7, 2A4, ARV
14x 2A4 and a Buffel ARV requested to get moving with the platform, meanwhile negotiations in progress to possibly order new 2A7 or 2A8-series tanks.
Anticipated Production run: c.50x 2A7.
7/ 🇭🇺 Hungary: Leopard 2A7HU, 2A4, AVLB, ARV
Deliveries are underway and first vehicles are in user's hands, arriving alongside a sizeable 209-vehicle order for KF-41 Lynx IFVs. It also has a natty camouflage to differentiate nicely from all the other 2A7 knocking about.

Image
Image
Image
8/ The 2A7HU are replacing legacy T-72 tanks obtained from the Soviet Union, though only c.30 T-72M1 remain in service with 130 more optimistically described as in reserve.
Production run: 44x 2A7HU, with second hand vehicles: 12x 2A4, 9x AVLB and 9x Buffel Image
9/ 🇳🇴 Norway: Leopard 2A8NO
Ordered in 2023 as 2A7NO but later upgraded the order to 2A8NOs, selected over the K2NO in competitive tender, Norway’s newest Leopards will replace 28 rather old 2A4NO that are well past their best.
Production run: 54 2A8NO + option for 18 more Image
10/ 🇸🇰 Slovakia: Leopard 2A8
Slovakia bought 15 2A4 in 2022, all of which have been delivered, and are now showing interest in new build 2A8 to significantly uplift their capabilities.
Production run: 45-50 2A8.
11/ 🇪🇸 Spain: Leopardo 2E M2/M2+
Spain operates a mixed fleet of 2A4 and 2E (the latter a 2A6 derivative), and are looking at a pathway to upgrade to a 2A7/2A8 analogue called the 2E M2+. Image
12/ Previous twitter thread on this upgrade plan:
Production run: not stated yet, likely in the 50-120 range.
13/ 🇭🇷 Croatia: Leopard 2A8
Possible replacement for the very old M-84, reportedly in competition with K2 and possibly Leclerc XLR.
Production run: not stated yet, likely c.50. Image
14/ 🇬🇷 Greece: Leopard 2A7HEL
Discussions underway to upgrade a sizeable portion of the 170x 2HEL (2A6 analogue) to the 2A7 standard, doubtless this would be uplifted to 2A8 in any contractual agreement that may emerge.
Production run: not stated yet, likely in the 120-150 range. Image
15/ 🇩🇪 Germany: Leopard 2A7V/2A7A1/2A8
A sizeable upgrade was completed in late 2023 to deliver 104x 2A7V, upgraded from a mix of 2A4/2A6-derivatives/2A7 (obtained from the Dutch). 2A7A1 was then developed, featuring Trophy integration...
Image
Image
16/ ..., and in 2023 a (first?) batch of 18 2A8 with option for 105 more was placed.
Production run: 104x 2A7V, 17x 2A7A1, 18x 2A8
17/ 🇵🇱 Poland: Leopard 2A4, 2A5, 2PL
As part of the most eclectic tank fleet in the world, Poland ordered a range of Leopard 2 from 2002 with as-is tanks and a bespoke national configuration, the 2PL. They've also bought Abrams, ordered K2 and have a myriad of old T-72 and PT-91s Image
Long term Poland plans to settle on fewer tank types, operating twin fleets of US-sourced M1 Abrams and Korean K2PL, eventually retiring the Leopard 2 fleets.
Production run: 86x 2A4, 105x 2A5, 62x 2PL
Image
Image

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Jon Hawkes

Jon Hawkes Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @JonHawkes275

Feb 14
1/ Japan's Future Amphibious Technology Research (FAT-R). The oft-overlooked work to really push the envelope of AAV tech that is actually making some great strides in the background.

A short summary 🧵 Image
2/ A quick background of Amphibious Assault Vehicles (AAVs). Since the DUKW and LVT in the 1940s, there has been a niche for AFV capable of swimming when afloat and transitioning to land movement seamlessly to transport and support an opposed landing and inland movement.
Image
Image
3/ In the contemporary space the only meaningful example is the AAV7 (previously LVTP7), in service since 1972 and still the only vehicle of its type (ack that there are some peripheral amphibious AFV like ACV/SUPERAV, AMV and others, but nothing that was from the outset an AAV). Image
Read 22 tweets
Feb 9
1/ A short summary of 🇪🇸's Leopard 2E upgrade plans.

Spain bought 219 Leopard 2E (local name Leopardo 2E), which are broadly speaking a 2A6 analogue with the Strv 122/2A6HEL roof armour and some unique to Spain C4 gear (LINCE BMS, Indra licence-built TI optics etc) Image
2/ The initial plan was to manage obsolescence and reduce some of the maintenance burden - in recent years the training has been curtailed simply because funding for spares and consumables wasn't there, so they are rather keen to minimise outdated elements.
3/ However, some money has been found somewhere, and so the upgrade plan has expanded into a multi-phase approach. Phase 1 will result in the Leopard 2E M1, and remains on the original plan - obsolescence management and sustainment efficiencies. IOC is planned for 2029. Image
Read 12 tweets
Jan 23
1/ UKs Challenger 3 prototype now a real steel bit of kit, going into trials within the next few weeks. Imagery from #IAV2024 courtesy of @Janes own @Rivet_Counter

A few of the usual objections/critiques/comments flying around on twitter this week - a mini thread of responses to Image
2/ The design remains unchanged at the overall design level from that which I summarised 3 years ago at contract award in this thread:
3/ Critique: "Its not got APS". Yes it does, we've seen pics & videos of Trophy tested on mock turrets. Remember CR3 is "fitted for but not with" APS so prototype not having it means v little. This kind of testing would not be expected to have more than ballast to simulate APS Image
Read 8 tweets
Oct 16, 2023
1/ A much requested 🧵 thread on the confused and misunderstood topic of Challenger 2/3’s engine and just how many horses are, or can be fit under the deck of these tanks. Short answer – there is no 1,500 hp uplift for CR2 or CR3. Image
2/ There *could* be a lift to 1,500 hp but there are major technical obstacles and there is no intent to do it. There is be a mid-ground to be found that is being looked at outside committed programmes.
3/ First establish the as-is: CR2 is fitted with the original 1998 powerpack consisting of a Perkins CV12-6A V-12 diesel engine and David Brown TN54E epicyclic transmission, plus a monster cooling system. Image
Read 40 tweets
Jan 11, 2023
1/ Wheels vs tracks: a short series of threads on relative merits of each, continuing with one on turning circles

TLDR: tracked AFV have better capabilities for turning, even when both vehicle types can do neutral turns, which the vast majority of wheeled AFV cannot
2/ Missed the start of this (increasingly large…) mini-series of threads? Start over here:
3/ Traversing (or better yet, avoiding) obstacles is obviously simpler and quicker if you can turn the vehicle easily. In tight and complex terrain, like urban or woodland, being able to turn tightly is very important.
Read 15 tweets
Jan 5, 2023
1/ Wheels vs tracks: a short series of threads on relative merits of each, continuing with one on approach and departure angles.

TLDR: tracked vehicles broadly have better capabilities for approach, departure, belly/ramp and tilt angles.
2/ Missed the start of this (increasingly large…) mini-series of threads? Start over here:
3/ So, approach and departure angles. Again one that has been a big factor repeatedly already, these are the longitudinal angle a vehicle can reach before it strikes the terrain.
Read 19 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us!

:(