Tony Bobulinski is taking the fight to Cassidy Hutchinson. A statement from his attorney @jbinnall reads as follows:
We will see to it that Ms. Hutchinson soon gets her day in court to tell her story under oath in front of a jury. We are confident that when the facts are clearly presented, the truth will prevail. When Ms. Hutchinson loses - which we believe should happen quickly - Mr. Bobulinski looks forward to donating the money judgment, which should include the profit she gained from her book and media appearances, to a children’s hospital in need.
Tony Bobulinski's counsel delivers a letter calling for Cassidy Hutchinson to hold and preserve records in connection with a coming defamation suit against her.
The letter notes in part:
your client told a far-fetched tale that, when Mr. Bobulinski met with Mark Meadows in Rome, Georgia, at a Trump Campaign rally, Mr. Meadows, under suspicious circumstances, handed Mr. Bobulinski, “...what appeared to be a folded sheet of paper or a small envelope.” This is a bald-faced lie. No such exchange occurred; however, Ms. Hutchinson intended her statement to sensationalize and associate a defamatory implication that some type of unethical conduct occurred. Further, Ms. Hutchinson’s commentary on the meeting, which was simply an exchange of pleasantries during which no business or political discussions took place, associated a defamatory implication that the meeting involved nefarious dealings.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
🧵The Ultimate Thread on Biden’s Betrayal of Israel
The notion that President Joe Biden is a stalwart supporter of Israel, let alone acting in the best interests of the U.S. in the Middle East, is and has been a complete and total canard.
This Big Lie, propagated by the administration and its mouthpieces, provides cover for what amounts to an anti-American plot to put the screws to Israel, as part and parcel of an effort to make the world’s leading state sponsor of terror, Iran, the regional hegemon.
Since Oct. 7th – a Holocaust-in-a-day perpetrated by Iran’s proxy Hamas – despite initial rhetoric to the contrary and the continued provision of munitions (for now), the Biden admin has shown in word and more importantly deed that it is doing everything it possibly can within political reason to slander, stymie, sabotage, and ultimately imperil the very existence of our chief ally in the Middle East.
Now the Biden admin is going in for the kill shot: A push to force the Jewish state to effectively lose the war to Hamas, free hundreds if not thousands of jihadists, and reward a Palestinian Arab population overwhelmingly supportive of the Oct. 7 massacre and Hamas with a state in a bid to “sue for peace” with Iran -- threatening Israel's very existence in exchange for purported "normalization" with Arab powers.
What follows is an effort to chronicle the Biden admin's treachery towards Israel.
This thread should serve as the death knell of the false narrative that Biden supports the Jewish state – and more fundamentally that he is representing the interests of the American people over those of our adversaries with the blood of our countrymen on their hands.
10/7/23: The very day in which Hamas executes the most deadly and barbaric attack on Israel in its modern history – raping, murdering, burning, mutilating, beheading, and taking hostage innocents totaling 1,200 dead and approximately 240 abducted – including among them ~40 Americans – U.S. Office of Palestinian Affairs urges “all sides” including Israel “to refrain from violence and retaliatory attacks.” It quickly deletes the message, but this reflexive response will prove revealing
Yes, Hunter Biden's legal team really argued that his Dad's Justice Department is selectively prosecuting him because...Republicans are weaponizing the DOJ
Note that to create the appearance that Special Counsel Weiss is an apolitical actor, DOJ points to his appointment by the Obama-Biden admin -- as opposed to how Dem hacks always harp on him being a Trump appointee (despite fact it was Delaware's Dem senators who pushed him)
The full transcript of the Dec. 5th @WaysandMeansGOP hearing with IRS whistleblowers Gary Shapley and Joseph Ziegler is out waysandmeans.house.gov/wp-content/upl…
.@JasonSmithMO: "Vice President Biden appears to have treated Air Force Two like a corporate jet, traveling to Ukraine and Mexico to advance Hunter Biden's business interests. Evidence from today's documents show right around the time of international trips, like those to Ukraine, Joe Biden was emailing his son and his son's business partner from private email accounts using aliases while Vice President."
Gary Shapley asks the pivotal question: "after [then-U.S. Attorney David] Weiss went to the Biden-appointed U.S. Attorney [in Washington D.C.], the statute of limitations on the 2014 and 2015 tax years [when Hunter Biden evaded Federal taxes on income from Ukrainian energy company Burisma] was allowed to expire. Why? That is the key question Congress needs answered. It has asked Mr. Weiss. He refused to answer. To date, he has not been compelled to answer."
So you're telling me that the great-aunt of the youngest American hostage -- and first American -- to be released by Hamas is a buyer of Hunter Biden's art, who was then appointed by Joe Biden to the U.S. Commission for the Preservation of America's Heritage Abroad?
The swap of hostages for jihadists is likely to prove disastrous for Israel.
What this little girl endured and will endure for the rest of her life is unthinkable -- as is the case for all the hostages and their families.
That the Bidens' corruption makes this fact pattern at all salient is nauseating and disgusting.
*Addendum to initial post. The timeline is not clear as to when Ms. Naftali bought Hunter Biden's art vs. when she was appointed by Joe Biden to the relevant commission. Hunter's former biz associate Eric Schwerin was tabbed for that commission previously by President Obama
New Revelation: Per a recent @JudiciaryGOP interview with former CISA Director Chris Krebs, the DHS sub-agency was flagging content to social media companies for potential suppression before CISA was established in Nov. 2018 judiciary.house.gov/sites/evo-subs…
.@JudiciaryGOP scrutinized disclaimers CISA put in emails flagging content for social media companies to consider purging, and found that lo and behold, the language was tailored to open the platforms to pressure of threatened reprisal from the likes of the FBI
"CISA’s disclaimer indicated to the social media companies that CISA, law enforcement, and intelligence agencies may receive the misinformation report, but the disclaimer stated only that CISA would not retaliate against the social media companies if they failed to censor the flagged content. CISA made no promises with respect to what the FBI or one of the intelligence agencies may do. And the social media companies were well aware that CISA was forwarding some subset of the reports to the FBI (if not other federal law enforcement or intelligence agencies)."