No, Youth Gender-Transition Treatment Is Not 'Life Saving', Study Finds
The first ever study to test the widely made claim that youth medical gender-transition treatment prevents suicide deaths found no such evidence, I report for @NYPost. 🧵⬇️ nypost.com/2024/02/24/opi…
The movement backing gender-transition treatment for kids is built on the claim that it's “life saving.” Groups that claim this: @ACLU @GLAAD @HRC @WPATH @AmerAcadPeds @AmerMedicalAssn. But no one's tried to figure out whether this claim is true. Until now
A major new Finnish study found: Cross-sex hormones and gender-transition surgeries for adolescents and young adults had no significant independent link to suicide deaths, nor did gender distress severe enough to send young people to a gender clinic. mentalhealth.bmj.com/content/27/1/e…
What was independently tied to a greater chance of suicide in adolescents and young adults with gender-related distress? A high number of appointments with mental-health specialists--meaning, severe mental health challenges. nypost.com/2024/02/24/opi…
The Finnish researchers concluded:
▶️Suicide deaths were about 4 times higher, but still rare, in gender-distressed young people.
▶️Their higher suicide rate was tied to their much higher rate of severe psychiatric problems, not to their gender distress. nypost.com/2024/02/24/opi…
What gender-distressed young people need most urgently, the Finnish study authors concluded, is comprehensive mental health care – and not necessarily controversial medical interventions. nypost.com/2024/02/24/opi…
This study gets to the heart of a fierce debate: Whether trans-identified youths’ high rate of mental health problems is mostly caused by stigma against trans people. Or whether, as many skeptics argue, at least some young people might identify as trans as a way of dealing with mental health issues that aren’t driven by gender identity. nypost.com/2024/02/24/opi…
Erica Anderson, former head of @USPATH1, a @WPATH division, frowned upon a reportedly common question gender clinics ask of on-the-fence parents: “Would you rather have a living son or dead daughter?” “It is most unethical to say that kind of thing to parents,” said Dr. Riittakerttu Kaltiala, leader of the new study, and top adolescent psychiatrist at Finland’s Tampere University Hospital. “It’s not based on facts.” @eanderh @kaltial nypost.com/2024/02/24/opi…
@PaulGarciaRyan, president of @TherapyFirstOrg, which calls for counseling as the priority treatment for youth gender distress, pointed to guidelines that say journalists and doctors shouldn’t oversimplify suicide or say it’s an expected response to any one factor. Doing so, he said, might actually cause “or worsen suicidal thoughts in vulnerable young people.” Garcia-Ryan, who is himself a detransitioner, having previously identified and lived as a trans woman, was a major part of Pamela Paul’s recent @NYTimes @NYTOpinion article on gender transition treatment: nytimes.com/2024/02/02/opi… nypost.com/2024/02/24/opi…
How the researchers conducted their analysis:
They relied on Finland’s comprehensive health database, which has lifetime health records, and death records, on everyone in the nation (population 5.5M) and thus no loss to follow-up unless people left the country.
The researchers examined records on all 2,083 people who had their first visit to either of the nation’s two gender clinics at age 22 or younger—at 18 on average and as young as eight—from 1996 to 2019.
These researchers put together a comparison group of nearly 17,000 Finns. This included eight people (4 males and 4 females) for each gender-distressed person, matched to their age and birthplace.
There was an average of nearly 7 years of health information on each person, through June 2022.
38% (796 people) of the gender-distressed youths went on cross-sex hormones or received gender-transition surgeries. Many started this treatment before age 18, Dr. Kaltiala told me for my reporting for @NYPost. (That detail is not in the paper.)
There were 55 deaths. 20 were suicides, including 7, or 0.3 percent, of the gender-distressed youths and 0.1 percent of the comparison group.
This translated to a suicide death rate of 51 per 100,000 cumulative years of follow-up in the gender-distressed group and 12 per 100,000 in the controls. This meant that before the data were adjusted for confounding variables, the gender-distressed youths had about a 4.25-fold higher suicide rate than the comparison group. This difference is similar to the 5.5-fold higher suicide rate among gender-distressed youths found in a recent analysis of attendees of England’s youth gender clinic. (See: )
Both these studies concluded that suicide deaths, while higher in gender-distressed young people, are nevertheless rare in this population. This stands in contrast to widespread alarming claims that such young people have an extremely high suicide rate. These claims appear unfounded. However, this population does have a high rate of suicidal thoughts and behaviors, which are genuinely miserable and harrowing experiences, as my sources were eager to emphasize.
After adjusting for age, biological sex, and the number of specialist psychiatric appointments, the study authors found no statistically significant independent difference in the suicide death rate between the gender-distressed youths and the matched controls based on: 1) Whether they received gender-transition treatment; or 2) The fact that they had gender distress severe enough to send them to a gender clinic. ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/P… nypost.com/2024/02/24/opi…
It remains possible that if the Finnish overall follow-up time had been longer and/or the study population had been larger, the study authors could have detected an independent, statistically significant difference in the suicide death rate based on whether adolescents and young adults received gender-transition treatment. But the fact that the authors could not do so even with the quite large data set at hand speaks to how rare suicide deaths were.
It also speaks to what Dr. Marci Bowers, president of WPATH told me: That suicide deaths are not a good metric of success for prescribing cross-sex hormones to young people who identify as transgender. Dr. Bowers said the evidence is, nevertheless, overwhelming that this treatment improves kids’ mental health. nypost.com/2024/02/24/opi…
The rarity of suicides in this Finnish study stands in direct conflict with the oft-repeated question that gender clinics pose of on-the-fence parents: “Would you rather have a live son or a dead daughter?” According to this study, this mantra falsely suggests that suicide is extremely likely, and imminently so, absent gender-transition treatment for young people with gender dysphoria.
Many people I interviewed characterized this question as egregiously coercive and deeply unfair to say to worried parents. Some version of it was allegedly posed of the parents of the person who is suing the @AmerAcadPeds and the author of the AAP’s 2018 policy statement on pediatric gender-transition treatment. I covered that case for the @NewYorkSun: nysun.com/article/lawsui…
Of all the orgs that have claimed gender-transition treatment is “life saving” and that I contacted for comment for this @NYPost article, @WPATH was the only respondent. No response from: @ACLU @GLAAD @HRC @WPATH@AmerAcadPeds @AmerMedicalAssn. nypost.com/2024/02/24/opi…
In recent years, multiple teams of researchers have systematically reviewed the available studies about gender-transition medicine for kids. They all found the science to be of low quality and uncertain. Accordingly, multiple European nations have moved to restrict minors’ access to gender-transition treatment, including Finland in 2020. By the late 2010s, Finland had already started sharply dialing back access to puberty blockers and cross-sex hormones for minors after Dr. Kaltiala’s analyses strongly suggested such treatment was not helping the young people’s often severe mental health problems. nypost.com/2024/02/24/opi…
Dr. Kaltiala recently came out against pediatric gender-transition treatment in @bariweiss’ @thepf:
‘Gender-Affirming Care Is Dangerous. I Know Because I Helped Pioneer It.’ thefp.com/p/gender-affir…
A 2023 Finnish study by the same team found that providing gender transition treatment was not associated with a subsequent reduction in the rate of psychatric specialist appointments, suggesting that the treatment did not improve mental health. cambridge.org/core/journals/…
Other major figures in the pediatric gender care field who have called gender-transition treatment for youths “life saving” and who did not respond to my requests for comment for my @NYPost article finding that this claim is not supported by evidence include: @Stanford’s Diana Tordoff and @UCSF, psychiatrist @Jack_Turban, the leaders of 2 papers oftenpointed to as evidence that this treatment lowers suicidality, but which have been denounced by skeptics as flawed.
Sources:
Also not responding to my requests for comment was Diane Chen, a Lurie Children’s Hospital in Chicago psychologist, who led a two-year study that gave hormone treatment to 315 youths and saw two suicides—a very high suicide rate among people *on* gender-transition treatment. nejm.org/doi/full/10.10…
Here is the new Finnish study:
All-cause and suicide mortalities among adolescents and young adults who contacted specialised gender identity services in Finland in 1996–2019: a register study mentalhealth.bmj.com/content/27/1/e…
@GLAAD, for one, has claimed that the “science is settled” regarding the benefits of gender-transition treatment for minors. But the science is complex and ever-evolving. The Finnish study contradicts GLAAD's claims that such treatment is "life saving."
The Finnish study was first presented at the @SEGM_EBM conference in New York City in October. I wrote about it then: benryan.substack.com/p/youth-gender…
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
How Can Doctors Like This Provide Competent Care To Their Patients?
Some beef with Dr. Jonathan Howard, by @JesseSingal. jessesingal.substack.com/p/how-can-doct…
Dr. Jonathan Howard, a neurologist and psychiatrist at @NYULangone Health, is furious at Michael Shermer, the founding publisher of Skepticmagazine.
Howard is an impressive figure. Like many doctors at university-affiliated medical centers, he also serves as a professor, in this case at the @NYUGrossman School of Medicine. He has, according to his biography, “authored and edited multiple textbooks” on multiple sclerosis, his area of specialty.
Why is Dr. Jonathan Howard furious at @MichaelShermer? It has to do with a recent exchange between Senator Josh Hawley and an OB-GYN named Dr. Nisha Verma. Hawley, seeking to make a point about “gender ideology” (as he might call it) during a hearing, repeatedly asked Verma if men can get pregnant and Verma could not give a straight answer. Shermer chimed in to suggest an answer Verma could have given that accounts for the fact that, as Shermer (and anyone else using the traditional, biological definition of the term) sees it, men cannot, in fact, get pregnant.
That’s why Howard is furious, and that’s why he wrote a deeply aggrieved article in Science-Based Medicine about Shermer’s bigotry. The headline? “The Anti-Trans Obsessions of ‘Skeptic’ Michael Shermer: Hallucinating Imaginary Demons to Empower Actual Villains, Once Again.” The subheadline? “I want to demonstrate to Michael Shermer that it’s possible for men like us to not talk about trans people constantly. If I can do it, so can he.” (If you’re unfamiliar with Science-Based Medicine’s strange recent trajectory, see here or here.)
Not only does Dr. Jonathan Howard of NYU Langone Medical Center disagree with Michael Shermer that men can’t get pregnant — Howard thinks that to even ask this question puts other humans in danger.
That probably sounds like a caricature on my part, or a sloppy and inaccurate gloss of Howard’s actual views. But that’s exactly what he wrote
Jonathan Howard has gotten it into his head, meanwhile, that I am personally responsible for the MAHA movement because once I published an essay on Vinay Prasad’s Substack about trans medicine researchers deceiving the public. This is bonkers conspiracy thinking by Howard.
After @jessesingal explained in exacting detail why the study Jonathan Howard cited as evidence of pediatric gender-transition treatment’s efficacy was bunk, Howard respond with this mischaracterization of what Singal said about Howard’s inability to understand the paper.
Dr. Blair Peters,a gender-transition surgeon at OHSU, responds with disdain to the American Society of Plastic Surgeons coming out against such surgeries for minors. He says the broader membership was never polled about this.
Which is the same thing that has happened at the American Academy of Pediatrics, for example, but going in the other direction. No matter how hard @JuliaMasonMD1 has pushed, the AAP’s 2018 policy statement on the gender-affirming care method has never been up for a vote by the broader membership.
All of the major medical organizations that have led the way in establishing pediatric gender medicine’s broader credibility, including the AAP and the Endocrine Society in particular, have supported these practices in minors based on the decisions of small committees.
The AAP’s 2018 policy statement was written by a single person, Dr. Jason Rafferty, who was a resident at the time.
All of the other medical societies’ little committees have followed these other groups’ lead, along with WPATH. This has given the illusion that all medial providers support these practices in minors.
But I’ve spoken to pediatricians who are too afraid to express their concerns at the AAP’s annual conference for fear this will destroy their careers.
More from Blair Peters:
In 2024, Dr. Blair Peters, aka “Queer Surgeon,” spoke with the head of the ASPS and they had this remarkable exchange about whether doctors can be trusted to self police.
People are shocked that all it took for the AMA to change its policy on pediatric gender transition surgeries was for another medical group, the ASPS, to do it. But this phenomenon is how the unanimity among the medical groups fell into place in the first place. It was only ever based on a few small committees within a couple of medical organizations, putting aside WPATH, which is a quasi-activist-medical organization.
It got started in the 2010s as WPATH and the Endocrine Society, which have a lot of overlap between them and referred to one another's guidelines in their citations, put out guidelines. And then in 2018 a single medical resident wrote the American Academy of Pediatrics' policy statement on the gender-affirming care method. Along the way, other major medical associations took these other groups' lead, including the APA and AMA. And then all the other ones fell in line.
These groups did not conduct major independent analyses of the evidence. Even the AAP never conducted a systematic literature review to support its policy statement. And in August 2023, the AAP said it was going to conduct one. But there is no sign that the organization has even started on that. Because if they ever did, there is only one conclusion that it could have: that the evidence backing providing gender-transition interventions to minors is weak and inconclusive.
All this is to say is that the mantra "all major medical association support gender affirming care for kids" was always a hallow claim. What it really meant is that: "A few small committees at a few organizations decided to support this, in part because of one another, and all the other small committees at all the other organizations followed their lead."
If you want to go down the rabbit hole of how citation laundering laid the groundwork for the supposed medical consensus on gender-transition treatment for minors, I highly recommend @buttonslives's reporting: buttonslives.news/p/new-systemat…
At 16, Fox Varian got a mastectomy while undergoing a gender transition. She sued her psychologist and plastic surgeon for leaving her ‘disfigured for life.’ Benjamin Ryan reports from the courtroom.
Follow and support my Substack, where I cover pediatric gender medicine: benryan.substack.com. I was the only reporter to attend the entire three-week trial and will be providing more in-depth reporting and commentary on the case.
The opening of my Free Press article:
Fox Varian had a turbulent childhood. Her parents split when she was seven, triggering a three-year custody battle that ultimately saw her estranged from her father. She suffered from a constellation of mental health problems, including depression, anxiety, and social phobia. She was diagnosed with autism and bounced around various schools. Her first period sent her into a meltdown, and she battled disordered eating and body-image issues. By mid-adolescence, she was completely lost.
At 15, she began questioning her gender during sessions with her psychologist. She changed her birth name, Isabella, to Gabriel, which she saw as androgynous. Over the next two months, she cut her hair short, began binding her breasts, switched her name again, to Rowan, and started telling people she was transgender.
In December 2019, 11 months after she started this public social transition, Varian underwent surgery to remove her breasts. She was 16 years old.
Varian, who adopted the name Fox at 18 and is now 22, is one of thousands of minors who underwent gender-transition surgery over the past decade. And she is just one of the young people who have come to regret permanently addressing what was only a temporary identity shift.
Three years after her mastectomy, Varian stopped identifying as transgender and began a process known as detransitioning. In May 2023, she filed a medical malpractice lawsuit against the two principal Westchester County, New York, care providers who oversaw her gender transition: her long-time psychologist, Kenneth Einhorn, and Dr. Simon Chin, who performed the mastectomy.
On Friday, a jury in White Plains, New York, awarded Varian $2 million in damages. Varian’s case is the first malpractice suit from a detransitioner to go before a jury, and I was the only reporter to attend the entire three-week trial. Represented by personal-injury attorney Adam Deutsch, Varian said she had been injured by the defendants due to their deviation from standard practices and a lack of informed consent. While there are no guarantees in medical malpractice lawsuits, legal experts believe Varian’s victory could inspire a wave of similar cases that would significantly disrupt pediatric gender medicine.
Claire Deacon, mother to Fox Varian, the detransitioner who won a $2M jury award after suing her care providers over the mastectomy she got at 16, testified that Varian's psychologist, Kenneth Einhorn, browbeat her into consenting with threats of her child's suicide.
Subscribe to my Substack for further in-depth reporting about the case. I was the only reporter to attend the entire three-week trial. benryan.substack.com
Dr. Loren Schechter, the head of gender-affirming surgery at Rush University Medical Center in Chicago and the president-elect of the World Professional Association for Transgender Health (WPATH), testified that gender-transition surgery is not form of suicide prevention. thefp.com/p/a-legal-firs…
NYU neurologist/psychiatrist Jonathan Howard has been making a stink over @MichaelShermer's recent statements about transgender issues on @BrianLehrer's show.
Here, Howard cites a @Harvard study that falsely claimed youth "rarely" get gender-transition surgeries. In fact, about 1,000 minors got a mastectomy for this purpose annually in recent years, before state bans set in.
I wrote about that Harvard study when it came out. I demonstrated how its authors had quite evidently sought to mislead the public about this issue: benryan.substack.com/p/how-harvard-…
So, in fact, it is not Shermer who is "making things up" about this point in particular, it was Harvard researchers that at least effectively did so.
As for expressing concerns about minors getting these surgeries, I would like Howard to look into the eyes of the mother who testified in the detransitioner civil trial that I just finished attending yesterday (the plaintiff won a $2M judgment against her care providers; my article on the suit will run in a major outlet next week) and tell her that the loss of her daughter's breasts when she was 16 amounts to a false concern.
How Harvard Teed Up the False Claim That the 'Vast Majority of Minors Getting Gender-Affirming Surgeries Are C-s Kids'
An opaquely written Harvard study and linked press release prompted false reporting that gynecomastia surgeries for boys are vastly more common than gender-affirming surgeries for transbenryan.substack.com/p/how-harvard-…
The other day, Howard wrote some screed where he referred to me as a "malignant actor" nefariously pursuing this line of inquiry for money. (Someone suggested that as a cancer survivor, maybe I am intrinsically malignant...) To that I say that Howard might get his facts straight about any of this stuff before he passes judgement on my reporting.
BREAKING: 1st Detransitioner to Take a Medical-Malpractice Lawsuit to Trial Wins $2 Million Judgement
Fox Varian sued her Westchester, NY, area psychologist and plastic surgeon for the gender-transition mastectomy she got at 16.
I was the only reporter to attend the entire 3-week, historic trial. Subscribe to my Substack to receive an alert about the feature article I have coming out next week in a major publication out about the trial: benryan.substack.com. I cover pediatric gender medicine as a specialty on my Substack.
Sorry to just give just a teaser for now about the case! But I wanted to get the word out about the verdict promptly, the slower pace of feature-article publishing notwithstanding.
The entire case file was put under seal when the trial started (although I obtained all those documents before they was sealed), and all the transcripts from the trial are also under seal. The riveting trial was sparsely attended and there was only one other reporter at the trial; and he only attended for part of it and, as I observed, took few notes. So my own hundreds of pages of notes from the trial will likely remain the only way for the public to learn about the all finer details of what transpired, possibly ever (or until an appeal, should that happen).
In addition to my article coming out in the media outlet soon, I intend to write a lot about what I observed and learned on my Substack over the coming weeks. Stay tuned…
I have identified 28 detransitioner lawsuits filed to date. Varian v. Einhorn was the first to go to trial and the first to win a judgment, making history. If anyone knows of any additional cases that are not on my spreadsheet below or sees any errors, please DM me.
Quite a few of the detransitioner lawsuits have run up against strict statutes of limitation, such as the case against leading pediatric gender doctor Johanna Olson-Kennedy. Attorneys intend to appeal this dismissal, as I wrote in November: benryan.substack.com/p/detransition…