Before someone proof-texts the Proverbs (a book intended to cultivate wisdom), consider:
✔️Applying "the rod" verses literally=beating young men w/stout rods
✔️We do not apply most Proverbs as imperatives
So ask yourself why those & why in that way? 2/4
And let me preempt Heb 12 as well:
✔️letter written to the suffering church
✔️Heb 12 encourages ppl the God who brings resurrection from death can use even evil against them for their maturity (≠God authors evil)
✔️Parents≠God
It can be difficult to evaluate the impact of corporal punishment (exploration of this & linked studies in this 🧵).
That does not mean we cannot make robust conclusions about the harm.
IMO @janetheimlich's thorough work is essential reading: 🧵 a.co/d/1kxVK4l
Any research attempting to evaluate CP (either as "working" or "turned out fine" or "harming" or "trauma") must consider the limitations of self-disclosure, the only data source for things happening behind closed doors.
Loyalty, shame, & memory recall all are relevant. 2/?
The vulnerability of remembering one's childhood, attachment to primary caregivers, cultural values about honoring parents, all result in understandable loyalties:
I was spanked. I turned out fine. They did their best. I love my parents. 3/?
“Christian parents who wish to sell their concept of God to their children must first sell themselves,” Dobson writes.
“If they are not worthy of respect, then neither is their religion or their morals, or their government, or their country, or any of their values." 🧵/?
In a moment of reckoning for American evangelicalism, Dobson’s words take on a different tenor.
After I read Fea's article for @theatlantic, I read "Dare to Discipline." Published in 1970, it sold over 2 million copies & launched a parenting empire. 2/?
In his first book, Dobson authoritatively claims that a host of social ills & undesirable adolescent behavior—everything from rebellion, STDs, pacifism, drug use—can be chalked up to parental failure to discipline their children properly, specifically before age four. 3/?
When I saw the priest swipe the Ash Wednesday cross on my baby’s forehead, I cried.
“Remember that you are dust and to dust you will return,” the priest said, and I looked at my round-cheeked, bobble-headed, newly-born gift, and I was terrified. 🧵/?
He will die one day, I thought, and the simple truth of the human condition quickened inside me.
I spent one January in the hospital with that child when he was gravely ill, and, for a time, the doctors didn’t know how to diagnose him. 2/?
If you’ve ever lingered in a children’s hospital, you know it is a hallowed place. It rends your heart to see young bodies worn thin w/illness & bloated w/medication, to watch toddlers toting IV poles, & to find children—who should be running & jumping & laughing—bedridden. 3/?
Parental fragility robs individual families of authentic connection.
Its systemic counterpart in church family subcultures like evangelicalism prevents powerholders from listening to the pain of the betrayed.
Fragility/defensiveness sets trajectory of future engagement 2/12
So ppl continue to understandably exit churches (& sometimes the faith) that demand leaders/power holders be judged by their intentions & not the impact.
Whatever their intentions, Dobson & co built empires around *opinions/advice* that they claimed were “God’s Way.” 3/12
Let's talk about "slander."
If we equate public critiques of books or sermons w/ cancel-culture & mob attack, or name thoughtful objections to be sinful slander, we platform unchallengeable people. 🧵/?
I was offline for many yrs before joining modern Areopagus of Twitter & have learned here's how it goes: provocative/inflammatory content (often markedly intended to stir up controversy & buzz in order to sell books or other resources) quakes through the conversation. 🧵/?
This sets off a tsunami of righteous outrage. Aftershocks of discussion follow: has the author been unfairly canceled by an online mob? Opinions & responses to responses whirl. Some say public content needs public engagement, esp if it is blasphemous, heterodox, or harmful. 🧵/?