The Cultural Tutor Profile picture
Feb 29, 2024 21 tweets 6 min read Read on X
Why the hell does February sometimes get an extra day? And why is it shorter than the other months, anyway?

It's all because of what Julius Caesar did 2,070 years ago in 46 BC.

What's special about 46 BC? It had 445 days, making it the longest year in history... Image
But the story begins in 753 BC, when Rome was founded by the mythical Romulus.

Romulus was credited with creating the first Roman calendar.

It had ten months, each of 30 or 31 days, beginning in Martius and ending in December. Image
What about the time between December and Martius?

Early Rome was fundamentally agricultural. With little work to do in Winter it was simply a long, dark, and undated stretch of time.

But as Roman society grew more sophisticated this situation became troublesome... Figures in a Winter Landscape by Andreas Schelfhout
The story goes that Numa Pompilius — the second of Rome's legendary seven kings — fixed it.

He introduced two new months, Ianuarius and Februarius, to cover the time between December and Martius. Sculpture of Numa Pompilius at the Louvre by Jean Guillaume Moitte (c.1800)
So the Romans had a twelve month calendar, but they kept the original names — including December as the "10th month" even though it had become the 12th.

Hence September, October, and November, meaning 7th, 8th, and 9th month respectively, also remained... and still do, somehow.
This calendar was lunar — that means it was based on the cycles of the moon rather than the sun.

The Romans borrowed it from the Greeks and Mesopotamians, who had calculated that each lunar cycle lasted 29.5 days.

So twelve of them, forming the lunar year, lasted 354 days.
But things were complicated by Roman superstitions regarding even numbers — they were considered unlucky.

Roman society was deeply religious and it was the priests who were in charge of organising the calendar, filled as it was with festivals, rites, and sacrifices. Marcus Aurelius performing sacrifice, from the Arch of Marcus Aurelius (165 AD)
So, to avoid unlucky even numbers, they subtracted one day from each of the previously 30 day months and added a single day to the lunar year to make it an odd number: 355 days.

That left 57 days to split between the two new months, January and February.
They gave January 29 days, leaving February with 28 — maths dictated that one of the twelve months simply had to have an even number of days.

Why they chose February we can only speculate. Some believe it is because Roman festivals of the dead were held in that month.
But the trouble with Numa's calendar was that, at 355 days, it fell ten days short of the 365 day solar year.

This is a problem for all lunar calendars because, over time, they "drift" away from the solar year and so the dates of festivals and seasons fall out of sync.
To fix this and keep the calendar synchronised the Roman priests were tasked with adding an "intercalary" month of 22 or 23 days, called Intercalaris, every two years.

In these leap years Intercalaris was added to the end of February, and those years lasted 377 or 378 days.
But this system was open to abuse, not least because Roman officials served annual terms and the priests in charge of Intercalaris were also politicians.

Thus they made years shorter or longer depending on whether their enemies or allies were in power.

Politics!
By the 1st century BC decades of civil war and political strife had caused this calendar to fall completely out of sync with the solar year.

So when Julius Caesar defeated Pompey and became "Dictator for Life" he decided to fix the old dating system once and for all. Julius Caesar by Clara Grosch (1892)
With help from leading mathematicians and astronomers he created what we now call the Julian Calendar.

A year was now 365 days long, with an extra day added once every four years to make up for the real length of the solar year, which had been calculated as 365.25 days.
Caesar used these extra ten days to make every month 30 or 31 days.

Apart from February, which was left with its traditional 28 days — and in leap years February was chosen to receive the extra day.

That decision over 2,000 years ago has stuck, hence the date today!
To make sure his new calendar started in sync with the solar year Caesar had to add three extra months to 46 BC, the year of his reform.

And so 46 BC was 445 days long; the longest year in history.

No wonder it was called "annus confusionis" — the year of confusion.
In 44 BC the month Quintilis was renamed in honour of Julius Caesar, becoming our modern July.

And thirty years later Sextilis was renamed in honour of Augustus, the heir to Caesar and Roman Emperor, becoming our August. The Augustus of Prima Porta
But this system had a flaw — the real length of the solar year is 365.2422 days, not 365.25.

So the Julian Calendar drifted by one day every 128 years.

That seems insignificant, but it was used for over 1,500 years — by the 16th century Easter was 10 days out of alignment.
So in 1582 Pope Gregory XIII commissioned a reform to correct the Julian Calendar, which was done by removing one leap year every four centuries.

The calendar was also reset, resulting in a bizzare event — Thursday 4th October 1582 was followed by... Friday 15th October! Image
And this "Gregorian Calendar" is the one we still use today.

It is a palimpsest whose systems are, deep within their coding, thousands of years old, going right back to the very dawn of human civilisation in Ancient Mesopotamia...
...including the Roman choice to make February both the shortest month and the one that would have a day added every leap year.

So, even in the age of computers and nuclear bombs, the way we measure time is still shaped by decisions made thousands of years ago.

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with The Cultural Tutor

The Cultural Tutor Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @culturaltutor

Aug 31, 2025
We spend more than 90% of our time inside, so why do we design so many of our interiors like this?

Grey carpets, white walls, harsh lighting.

It's generic, boring, and genuinely bad for our physical and psychological health... Image
Not all interiors look like this, but too many do, and more all the time.

Grey carpets, white walls, harsh lighting, neutral colours for details, everything plastic, shiny, and rectangular.

This has become the standard for new buildings (and refurbishments) around the world. Image
A common response is that some people like it, or at least don't mind it.

Maybe, but that's the problem.

The sum of all tastes is no taste at all, and if our aim is simply to make things that people "don't mind" then we end up with blandness. Image
Read 22 tweets
Aug 21, 2025
The world's most famous neoclassical buildings are kind of boring and generic when you actually look at them.

It's even hard to tell them apart: which one below is Versailles, or Buckingham Palace?

So here's why neoclassical architecture (although it's nice) is overrated: Image
Buckingham Palace, despite being one of the world's most famous and visited buildings, is essentially quite boring and uninspiring from the outside.

There's a certain stateliness to it, but (like most big neoclassical buildings) it's really just a box wrapped in pilasters. Image
The same is true of Versailles.

Again, it's evidently pretty (largely thanks to the colour of its stone) but there's something weirdly plain about it, almost standardised.

Plus the emphasis on its horizontal lines makes it feel very low-lying, undramatic, and flat. Image
Read 26 tweets
Aug 17, 2025
These aren't castles, palaces, or cathedrals.

They're all water towers, literally just bits of infrastructure relating to water management.

Is it worth the additional cost and resources to make things look like this... or is it a waste? Image
These old water towers are an architectural subgenre of their own.

There are hundreds, mostly Neo-Gothic, and all add something wonderful to the skylines of their cities.

Like the one below in Bydgoszcz, Poland, from 1900.

But, most importantly, they're just infrastructure. Image
We don't think of infrastructure as something that can improve how a town looks and feels.

Infrastructure is necessary to make life convenient; but also, we believe, definitionally boring.

These water towers prove that doesn't have to, and shouldn't be, the case. Image
Read 24 tweets
Aug 8, 2025
If one thing sums up the 21st century it's got to be all these default profile pictures.

You've seen them literally thousands of times, but they're completely generic and interchangeable.

Future historians will use them to symbolise our current era, and here's why... Image
To understand what any society truly believed, and how they felt about humankind, you need to look at what they created rather than what they said.

Just as actions instead of words reveal who a person really is, art always tells you what a society was actually like.
And this is particularly true of how they depicted human beings — how we portray ourselves.

That the Pharaohs were of supreme power, and were worshipped as gods far above ordinary people, is made obvious by the sheer size and abundance of the statues made in their name: Image
Read 23 tweets
Aug 6, 2025
This is St. Anne's Church in Vilnius, Lithuania.

It's over 500 years old and the perfect example of a strange architectural style known as "Brick Gothic".

But, more importantly, it's a lesson in how imagination can transform the way our world looks... Image
Vilnius has one of the world's best-preserved Medieval old towns.

It's a UNESCO World Heritage Site, filled with winding streets and architectural gems from across the ages.

A testament to the wealth, grandeur, and sophistication of the Polish-Lithuanian Commonwealth. Image
Among its many treasures is the Church of St Anne, built from 1495 to 1500 under the Duke of Lithuania and (later) King of Poland, Alexander I Jagiellon.

It's not particularly big — a single nave without aisles — but St Anne's makes up for size with its fantastical brickwork. Image
Read 18 tweets
Jul 31, 2025
Tell your friends! Your enemies! Your lovers!

The Spanish edition of my new book, El Tutor Cultural, is now available for pre-order.

It'll be released on 22 October — and you can get it at the link in my bio.

To celebrate, here are the 10 best things I've written about Spain: from why Barcelona looks the way it does to one of the world's most underrated modern architects, from the truth about Pablo Picasso to the origins of the Spanish football badge...Image
What makes Barcelona such a beautiful city? It wasn't an accident — this is the story of how the modern, beloved Barcelona was consciously created:

Image
And, speaking of Barcelona, here's why the renovation of the Camp Nou is — although necessary — a shame:

Image
Read 11 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us!

:(