I don't understand academics. Our brain = our bread and butter. Without it properly functioning, we cannot work.
We read peer reviewed lit and trust it. That lit says: covid = bad for brain.Really bad!
Yet no mitigation in our conferences or classrooms.
Our workplaces are unsafe.
So, what's going on?
A couple of thoughts: 1/ Most academics don't know about this. I am not sure this is true. In any case, I try to inform. There is really a lot of peer-reviewed lit out there, some of which comes in mainstream press. When did we stop following the science?
2/ Academics know about it but have resigned themselves to "it's a new disease that's going to be around forever." -- well, TB, polio, AIDS etc were never eradicated but does that mean we shouldn't use the tools to stop their spread? What makes covid special?
3/ Many academics think this literature is alarmist and wrong. Maybe. Maybe you're willing to bet your future health, your long-term employability, your life on it being wrong. This is a dangerous bet. Maybe I am risk-averse after all
4/ Academics have resigned themselves to collective action being possible, and (given how academia has been) bought into the mindset of everyone for themself--a kind of Hobbesian nightmare scenario where solidarity or vulnerability doesn't exit and where ...
4 (continued) you are strong. you're not one of those vulnerable people, or losers of the academic game. The mindset that we're just a small step away from falling, but if you firmly believe and look the other way and don't look an adjunct in the eye, it won't happen to you.
4 (continued) and this is what I believe is happening with covid denialism and academics. The sense that we're all alone, it's a terrible world where you can fall ill or where your university can downsize, but best way to deal with it is to eat, drink and be merry
Without collective action on this, we are all at risk. Individual choice of wearing a mask, or not attending a very crowded event (as many disabled ppl do) is not going to get us out of it. We need to demand safe work places. We're all vulnerable. We deserve safety /end
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
I saw someone today whom I had not seen since September. We were at a memorial service. It was packed. I was one of two people wearing a mask then. She then asked me "What's wrong, are you not feeling well?"
I said, "No, I just protect myself against covid."
So now we spoke 1/
She told me how she got covid shortly after then and was so, so tired for many months. How she had difficulties concentrating and getting anything done.
She said "I think you are wise to still protect yourself against covid, I didn't know it would be this bad." 2/
She thought it was fine if you were vaccinated and that the disease was now mild. But how mild is mild if you are ill for weeks and then are tired for months more? This was her first (known) infection. This is an educated woman. Many people genuinely do not know 3/
"people used to live life to the fullest when the plague and smallpox were going around," is a minimizing argument that's used against people who, in spite of public health and governments having given up, continue to protect themselves. Here's why it doesn't work: 1/
I think it seriously underestimates how horrible it was/is to live in times where infectious disease goes rampant and can come for your children, your middle-aged parents, and of course you. Hence Jane Austen "Are your parents well" before convo could even begin 2/
I read a lot of 17th-century letters for a new project and it's kinda disconcerting to see how people are really sad and devastated by how their kids, spouse, loved ones, keep on getting killed by diseases. They were not cavalier about it! They were very sad!! 2/
Many academics I know, and in general people experienced collective trauma in 2020-2021. They were very eager to return to normal and leave it all behind. Even on the height of it, they were anticipating this return to normal. So, is it a surprise that they went for it?
Even as the hoped-for herd immunity, hybrid immunity, exit waves (notice how the minimizers have quietly dropped exit waves, at some point even they realized how ridiculous it was) did not end the fact that we're still in a pandemic and a mass disabling event.
So we're stuck, and one reason we keep on being stuck is lack of political willpower. We lack political willpower because people are glad to go along in return to normal because they're betting (their life, long-term health etc and those of ppl close to them) they'll be fine.
Gonna break my X fast for this one since I find it important.
We tenured faculty are still actively helping the destruction of academia, and not doing much in the way of helping to save, let alone reform and improve, the structures that make our scholarly work possible. /1
E.g. cosplaying Harvard's academic integrity committee in the case of Claudine Gay. We *know* why the plagiarism stuff came up. Rufo even put the playbook on WSJ. Yet white fellow philosophers seemed eager to lift quotes from Free Beacon, "Much as it pains me, it's plagiarism" 2/
E.g., Hushing up sexual harassment by prominent faculty & telling grad students who speak out to keep their head down otherwise they'll never get a job. Remember when Saul Kripke's corpse was not yet cold and all of a sudden everyone was brave enough to say he was a harasser. 3/
Long covid is trending once again on Twitter/X. How many people do you know with long covid? You can expect that number to grow in the next months. If you don't have long covid, you might get it in a future bout w the virus. That's bc you have been sacrificed for political gain.
You might think you don't need to worry because your health is great and only the vulnerable need to worry. But unfortunately, everyone is potentially vulnerable. The people I know who got long covid were in excellent health before.
Posting once again the policy documents outlining how you have been consented into "back to normal". We didn't magically all decide this together.
You can also download them from the White House official congress website. Because this is the policy.
The situation of Isabel Fall (you can find easily what happened if you do not know) is one case that keeps on being at the back of my mind when I say we should exercise restraint when we are tempted to pile on. A couple of (probably controversial) thoughts on pile-ons 1/
I understand why this dynamic happens. Often, at least in philosophy, the pile on is an exasperated response to something that is systematically deeply wrong in our discipline, that angers us, and we want to vent. The writer of the pile-on has often no idea 2/
For example, that professor who recommended you need to be a sweet harmless bunny and wait until tenure and then finally you can grow a spine. This is such a common advice. I got it when I was subject to major harassment (when I was a postdoc). It is bad advice 3/