Marissa Franks Burt Profile picture
Mar 1 21 tweets 5 min read Read on X
It can be difficult to evaluate the impact of corporal punishment (exploration of this & linked studies in this 🧵).

That does not mean we cannot make robust conclusions about the harm.

IMO @janetheimlich's thorough work is essential reading: 🧵 a.co/d/1kxVK4l
Image
Any research attempting to evaluate CP (either as "working" or "turned out fine" or "harming" or "trauma") must consider the limitations of self-disclosure, the only data source for things happening behind closed doors.

Loyalty, shame, & memory recall all are relevant. 2/?
The vulnerability of remembering one's childhood, attachment to primary caregivers, cultural values about honoring parents, all result in understandable loyalties:

I was spanked. I turned out fine. They did their best. I love my parents. 3/?
Sometimes self-disclosure is inhibited by shame, both for adult children who find it difficult to name what they endured & for parents who may carry deep regrets.

The ritualization of Mother's/Father's Day in spite of domestic violence stats reveals our cognitive dissonance. 4/?
We also must consider memory recall which differs even w/in families.

It is not uncommon to find adult children who recount visceral details of repeated spankings while their parents sincerely state: You were hardly ever spanked. 5/?
Some of this testifies to generational patterns, but I also wonder about impact *on parents* who repeatedly ignore a child's cries as they hurt them.

I know of no studies examining what happens to a parent's brain, trauma response, etc. when they repeatedly hit a child. 6/?
As with other cases of abuse, sometimes people don't find the words to name their experience until much later in life if at all.

And how does one quantify the individual impact of an act of abuse? 7/?
How does a researcher define terms, limit the scope, communicate that to the respondent, and evaluate impact?

How do they account for cultural norms, individual personalities, and ingredients that may have mitigated or escalated harm? 8/?
Environmental considerations like, for instance, the isolation of homeschooling or churches/schools where any adult could spank a child are relevant, too.

Alongside all this, there is a chicken/egg dynamic. 9/?
Are there pre-existing harmful elements in the family system that result in a parent relying on CP such that CP is simply one manifestation of other problems? Or is it CP that is bringing the harm?

And how does one "prove" cause/effect, whether that CP "worked" or harmed? 10/?
This is why many researchers aim for a very precise scope. Consider this recent study that examined neural function & suggested that spanking has the same brain impact on children as that of more severe forms of maltreatment. 11/? srcd.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.111…
Image
Dr. Elizabeth Gershoff has been studying the effect of corporal punishment for decades. Have a look at her well-earned expert opinion: 12/? npr.org/sections/goats…
Image
I find meta-analyses to be the most helpful since they provide a broader lens. I like to share ⬇️ from Gershoff. Reading it reveals the complicated dynamics of this kind of research & the fact that we still can make conclusions. 13/?ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/P…
These studies are robust and are a reason many parents have rejected CP in their parenting practices.

Christians, however, often double down b/c of suspicions of external sources of authority, esp field of psychology, & erroneous beliefs about what "the Bible says." 14/?
They erroneously believe this is a please-God-over-man scenario thanks to popular Christian parenting ideas:

1st wave circa Dobson: Ofc spanking
2nd wave via T. Tripp: Spank "on faith"
3rd wave: cowardly middle-of-the-road silent personal-decision stance. 15/?
Ofc there are also a whole slew of Christian influencers, many of them young parents, positioning themselves as Christian parenting advice-givers who ardently defend CP via "trad" or "based" parenting content

The cycles repeat & none of it is theoretical 16/?
CP is harmful, but I contend CP via devoutly religious ppl is a thousandfold more b/c of:

-the implacable moral certainty of the perpetrator
-the accompanying spiritual teaching.

The former enables escalation & the latter exponential impact. (Again, read Heimlich's book!) 17/?
A child may be able to grow up & leave an abusive parent, but where does one go from a God who requires abuse?

This is why I spend so much time making a hermeneutical/exegetical argument against the corporal punishment of children. 18/?
I know there are Christian parents for whom CP is their hill to die on, but I do believe there are some who simply haven't been given other tools or do not know there are other options. 19/?
I suppose it's my hill to die on, too, because Christian parents who employ CP are uniquely ill-equipped to listen to children, whether young or adult.

I appeal to other Christians, esp pastors & teachers, to not shy away from addressing this.
/end
@threadreaderapp please unroll

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Marissa Franks Burt

Marissa Franks Burt Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @MBurtwrites

Feb 27
Many Christians ardently defending "spanking" again today

Bolstered by (IMO) eisegetical claims & doctrinal interpretations, they insist that God requires adults to hit young children & claim that is what God does for us.

I find this to be profoundly unChristian. 🧵/10
Jesus did not force compliance. He invited ppl & instructed His followers to…follow His example.

He sent them out to do His healing and liberating work, saying, “Freely you have received; freely give.”

Neither did the apostles punish ppl into behaving. 2/10
Traditional Christian doctrines identify sanctification as occurring through the Holy Spirit’s inner work to transform us into the likeness of Christ.

We are not beat or punished into Christlikeness. 3/10
Read 11 tweets
Feb 27
The Bible nowhere commands parents to "spank"/hit young children. Nowhere.

Neither does it tell parents that God gives them authority to hit young children.

Direct instruction given to Christian parents (repeated 2X)? *Fathers, do not embitter/provoke your children.* 🧵/4
Before someone proof-texts the Proverbs (a book intended to cultivate wisdom), consider:
✔️Applying "the rod" verses literally=beating young men w/stout rods
✔️We do not apply most Proverbs as imperatives

So ask yourself why those & why in that way? 2/4
And let me preempt Heb 12 as well:
✔️letter written to the suffering church
✔️Heb 12 encourages ppl the God who brings resurrection from death can use even evil against them for their maturity (≠God authors evil)
✔️Parents≠God

More specifics: 3/4
Read 5 tweets
Feb 20
“Christian parents who wish to sell their concept of God to their children must first sell themselves,” Dobson writes.

“If they are not worthy of respect, then neither is their religion or their morals, or their government, or their country, or any of their values." 🧵/? Image
In a moment of reckoning for American evangelicalism, Dobson’s words take on a different tenor.
After I read Fea's article for @theatlantic, I read "Dare to Discipline." Published in 1970, it sold over 2 million copies & launched a parenting empire. 2/?
In his first book, Dobson authoritatively claims that a host of social ills & undesirable adolescent behavior—everything from rebellion, STDs, pacifism, drug use—can be chalked up to parental failure to discipline their children properly, specifically before age four. 3/?
Read 23 tweets
Feb 14
When I saw the priest swipe the Ash Wednesday cross on my baby’s forehead, I cried.
“Remember that you are dust and to dust you will return,” the priest said, and I looked at my round-cheeked, bobble-headed, newly-born gift, and I was terrified. 🧵/?
He will die one day, I thought, and the simple truth of the human condition quickened inside me.

I spent one January in the hospital with that child when he was gravely ill, and, for a time, the doctors didn’t know how to diagnose him. 2/?
If you’ve ever lingered in a children’s hospital, you know it is a hallowed place. It rends your heart to see young bodies worn thin w/illness & bloated w/medication, to watch toddlers toting IV poles, & to find children—who should be running & jumping & laughing—bedridden. 3/?
Read 30 tweets
Feb 9
Fea’s article reads like a variation on: “It could’ve been worse.” “You don’t know how bad he/she had it” or “Remember the good times.”

Fragility & defensiveness plague evangelicalism. 🧵/12
theatlantic.com/ideas/archive/…
Parental fragility robs individual families of authentic connection.

Its systemic counterpart in church family subcultures like evangelicalism prevents powerholders from listening to the pain of the betrayed.

Fragility/defensiveness sets trajectory of future engagement 2/12
So ppl continue to understandably exit churches (& sometimes the faith) that demand leaders/power holders be judged by their intentions & not the impact.

Whatever their intentions, Dobson & co built empires around *opinions/advice* that they claimed were “God’s Way.” 3/12
Read 13 tweets
Feb 7
Let's talk about "slander."
If we equate public critiques of books or sermons w/ cancel-culture & mob attack, or name thoughtful objections to be sinful slander, we platform unchallengeable people. 🧵/?
I was offline for many yrs before joining modern Areopagus of Twitter & have learned here's how it goes: provocative/inflammatory content (often markedly intended to stir up controversy & buzz in order to sell books or other resources) quakes through the conversation. 🧵/?
This sets off a tsunami of righteous outrage. Aftershocks of discussion follow: has the author been unfairly canceled by an online mob? Opinions & responses to responses whirl. Some say public content needs public engagement, esp if it is blasphemous, heterodox, or harmful. 🧵/?
Read 38 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us!

:(