🧵regarding the 'rapidly absorbable' sutures, which are used less often than other suture types, but fill specific roles in a number of different surgical specialties.
We'll go over the uses of (and differences between) Chromic, plain gut, 'fast' gut, and Vicryl Rapide.
(1/)
Catgut has been used for suturing for many centuries, but it first became industrialized by the German company B Braun.
It is not (and probably never was) made from cats; instead it comes from the serosal layer of beef intestine or the submucosal layer of sheep intestine.
Catgut sutures are strands of ~90% collagen that are purified and chemically processed.
Because collagen is a protein, the longevity of the sutures is very much affected by any proteolytic enzymes in the local environment. We'll see why this is important later.
Surgeons recognized that plain catgut sutures simply did not last long enough for most purposes.
'Chromic' gut sutures were invented by Lister in 1881 in an attempt to solve this problem. By treating the catgut with chromic salts, it lasted longer.
Since Chromic is the variety of gut suture that is most often used, we'll start with it.
The collagen strands are treated with chromic acid salts, giving them a brownish color, and the strands last much longer. The process also makes them stronger than 'plain gut' sutures.
Chromic suture feels quite stiff when you're tying with it, but it 'sets down' extremely well.
When you 'set' down a throw, it tends to stay there...more so than for any other suture material.
Due to the high friction, there is minimal need for slip knots or surgeon's knots.
Chromic suture 'sets' down well and has excellent knot security, but because it's stiff, you will have to have good square knot technique, because the Chromic suture is less forgiving than others if the knots aren't tied right.
I usually tie 5 knots with chromic sutures.
In the early 20th century, when Chromic was practically the only absorbable suture available, it was used for almost everything that you would now use synthetic sutures like Vicryl or PDS for.
It was used for all types of GI, GU, GYN, orthopedic, and many other operations.
Chromic sutures are strong, but only for only 10-14 days, so when would they be used today?
They're used for rapidly healing tissues in places where you want them to disappear quickly.
Its most common use is probably in ENT operations, but it is also used in urology, dentistry, and occasionally in OB/GYN (for episiotomies and the "B-Lynch" suture.
In trauma surgery, 0 or #1 Chromic sutures are used to suture some of simpler, more linear liver lacerations.
In this case we're not really using it because of the properties of Chromic suture itself, but more likely because it comes on this huge, blunt point ("BP" needle).
Now for 'plain gut' sutures.
Plain gut sutures are not treated with chromic acid salts. They don't last as long (7-10 days or even less) and they also are not as strong as Chromic.
So they're used when you *want* them to dissolve quickly (and you don't have to cut them out).
The use of 'plain gut' sutures seems to be almost all in head and neck procedures. Our 'ENT' cart stocks them.
They are used for facial lacerations and for many types of ENT, oral, dental, and eyelid surgery, where removal of the sutures would be difficult or impractical.
There is also a 'fast absorbing' plain gut suture that is heat-treated so that it lasts even *less* time than plain gut. It is also a little weaker.
Fast absorbing plain gut only comes in one size (5-0 for Ethicon) and is used only for skin closures (usually on the face).
Catgut-based sutures (like 'chromic' gut and plain gut) have been banned for many years in the EU, Japan, and possibly elsewhere due to the theoretic risk of transmitting Bovine Spongiform Encephalopathy, though no cases of this have happened.
They remain in use in the U.S.
Before we leave catgut-based sutures, I had mentioned that proteolytic enzymes break down the collagen strands that make up the suture.
In areas where there is ⬆️proteolytic enzyme activity, like the mouth, the sutures will dissolve faster than they would if placed on the skin.
Finally, there is Vicryl Rapide.
Vicryl Rapide is often used when a rapidly absorbing suture is desired, and gut-based sutures are not available or the surgeon does not want to use them.
It is made by irradiating the same polyglactin 910 polymer used for 'normal' Vicryl.
Vicryl Rapide and 'regular' Vicryl sutures look the same and feel the same when you're tying with them...but they are NOT the same sutures and they may NOT be used interchangeably.
Vicryl Rapide will lose its strength in only 7-10 days, unlike 'regular' Vicryl (~3 weeks).
Just to emphasize this point again and give examples:
'Regular' Vicryl sutures are fine for bowel anastomoses but Vicryl Rapide would definitely **NOT** be suitable.
Vicryl Rapide is good for closing certain skin incisions but 'regular' Vicryl would NOT be good for this.
In conclusion:
The sutures seen below are the most common 'rapidly' absorbable kinds. Many surgeons may never have occasion to use them, but some do.
There are a few sutures that are moderately fast absorbing (like Monocryl or Caprosyn), but none absorb as fast as these.
⬛️
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
The more things change, the more they stay the same.
I found commentary from a 1967 edition of Look magazine that sounds...familiar.
First: junior doctor dissatisfaction and low pay, and UK physicians leaving for elsewhere: (1/ )
It has always been the case that though much of the conversation has to do with pay, that the true causes of discontent are more complex than that. Again, this was noted more than 50 years ago:
It was noted at the time (once again: 1967) that the practice of having doctors in training move around every few months was a problem. Which I'm gathering, remains an issue.
Temporary shunts for vascular trauma have actually been around for >100 yr. The first widespread use likely began with Prof. Tuffier in France, who used them in wounded soldiers in WW1 (1914-18).
The strategy was different though... (1/ )
Formal vascular repair had been described by Carrel, but was impractical in war conditions due to practically all wounds having massive contamination and delayed presentation, which made the vessels more friable and difficult to suture.
Bernheim had a famous quote on this:
Transport times were much longer then, and most of the wounded who were going to die by exsanguination had already done that.
So instead, the main problem of vascular injury at the time was probably thrombosis of the injured vessel with ischemia of the distal tissues.
🧵regarding the technique of 2-handed knot tying.
It's July again, so it's a good time to revisit this 🧵.
2-handed tying is becoming a lost art in surgery, but I believe it is worth learning. We'll start with just the basic steps. Advanced concepts will come later.
(1/)
If you want your first knot to be square, you generally *don't* want to start off with uncrossed threads (L picture).
Instead, it's better to cross the two threads first before you start tying the knot (R picture).
There are 2 ways to 'cross' the threads, which we'll see next.
When I do my initial crossing of threads, you'll see it can be done in one of two ways:
Either the L strand can be on top, or the R stand can be on top.
I can pick either one, but the one I choose will dictate which 'half' of the 2-handed technique I'll need to do first.
With the ASGBI meeting taking place in Edinburgh, it is prudent to revisit my previous 🧵on the deaths in the movie 'Braveheart'.
As you may recall, the goal was to estimate how many deaths were preventable if trauma surgical care was available in Scotland at the time.
(1/)
Once again, we will make some assumptions here:
- rapid 'scoop and run' transport
- casualties present individually and do not overwhelm the system.
The geography of this area provides certain benefits in terms of casualty allocation, as we'll see.
Specifically...in Braveheart, most of the deaths occurred in the Battle of Stirling and the Battle of Falkirk (approximate locations shown here).
As you can see, most of the major trauma centers in Scotland are located close nearby, making the transport more straightforward.
an underappreciated surgical knot that is used to secure a running suture. It has been shown to be more secure than a square knot.
We will cover how to do it, what not to do, and a modification that may make it more secure. (1/ )
An Aberdeen knot can be used at the end of a continuous (running) suture as an alternative to a square knot.
With a typical square knot, you will either be tying one strand to the two other strands in the loop, either by hand (L photo) or with an instrument tie (R photo).
But the Aberdeen knot is different. Instead of tying to the 2 strands, instead you'll use the single strand to go through the loop that is made by the other 2 strands.
Here, I'm holding the loop open with my R hand and using one of my R fingers to grab the string.