🧵regarding the 'rapidly absorbable' sutures, which are used less often than other suture types, but fill specific roles in a number of different surgical specialties.
We'll go over the uses of (and differences between) Chromic, plain gut, 'fast' gut, and Vicryl Rapide.
(1/)
Catgut has been used for suturing for many centuries, but it first became industrialized by the German company B Braun.
It is not (and probably never was) made from cats; instead it comes from the serosal layer of beef intestine or the submucosal layer of sheep intestine.
Catgut sutures are strands of ~90% collagen that are purified and chemically processed.
Because collagen is a protein, the longevity of the sutures is very much affected by any proteolytic enzymes in the local environment. We'll see why this is important later.
Surgeons recognized that plain catgut sutures simply did not last long enough for most purposes.
'Chromic' gut sutures were invented by Lister in 1881 in an attempt to solve this problem. By treating the catgut with chromic salts, it lasted longer.
Since Chromic is the variety of gut suture that is most often used, we'll start with it.
The collagen strands are treated with chromic acid salts, giving them a brownish color, and the strands last much longer. The process also makes them stronger than 'plain gut' sutures.
Chromic suture feels quite stiff when you're tying with it, but it 'sets down' extremely well.
When you 'set' down a throw, it tends to stay there...more so than for any other suture material.
Due to the high friction, there is minimal need for slip knots or surgeon's knots.
Chromic suture 'sets' down well and has excellent knot security, but because it's stiff, you will have to have good square knot technique, because the Chromic suture is less forgiving than others if the knots aren't tied right.
I usually tie 5 knots with chromic sutures.
In the early 20th century, when Chromic was practically the only absorbable suture available, it was used for almost everything that you would now use synthetic sutures like Vicryl or PDS for.
It was used for all types of GI, GU, GYN, orthopedic, and many other operations.
Chromic sutures are strong, but only for only 10-14 days, so when would they be used today?
They're used for rapidly healing tissues in places where you want them to disappear quickly.
Its most common use is probably in ENT operations, but it is also used in urology, dentistry, and occasionally in OB/GYN (for episiotomies and the "B-Lynch" suture.
In trauma surgery, 0 or #1 Chromic sutures are used to suture some of simpler, more linear liver lacerations.
In this case we're not really using it because of the properties of Chromic suture itself, but more likely because it comes on this huge, blunt point ("BP" needle).
Now for 'plain gut' sutures.
Plain gut sutures are not treated with chromic acid salts. They don't last as long (7-10 days or even less) and they also are not as strong as Chromic.
So they're used when you *want* them to dissolve quickly (and you don't have to cut them out).
The use of 'plain gut' sutures seems to be almost all in head and neck procedures. Our 'ENT' cart stocks them.
They are used for facial lacerations and for many types of ENT, oral, dental, and eyelid surgery, where removal of the sutures would be difficult or impractical.
There is also a 'fast absorbing' plain gut suture that is heat-treated so that it lasts even *less* time than plain gut. It is also a little weaker.
Fast absorbing plain gut only comes in one size (5-0 for Ethicon) and is used only for skin closures (usually on the face).
Catgut-based sutures (like 'chromic' gut and plain gut) have been banned for many years in the EU, Japan, and possibly elsewhere due to the theoretic risk of transmitting Bovine Spongiform Encephalopathy, though no cases of this have happened.
They remain in use in the U.S.
Before we leave catgut-based sutures, I had mentioned that proteolytic enzymes break down the collagen strands that make up the suture.
In areas where there is ⬆️proteolytic enzyme activity, like the mouth, the sutures will dissolve faster than they would if placed on the skin.
Finally, there is Vicryl Rapide.
Vicryl Rapide is often used when a rapidly absorbing suture is desired, and gut-based sutures are not available or the surgeon does not want to use them.
It is made by irradiating the same polyglactin 910 polymer used for 'normal' Vicryl.
Vicryl Rapide and 'regular' Vicryl sutures look the same and feel the same when you're tying with them...but they are NOT the same sutures and they may NOT be used interchangeably.
Vicryl Rapide will lose its strength in only 7-10 days, unlike 'regular' Vicryl (~3 weeks).
Just to emphasize this point again and give examples:
'Regular' Vicryl sutures are fine for bowel anastomoses but Vicryl Rapide would definitely **NOT** be suitable.
Vicryl Rapide is good for closing certain skin incisions but 'regular' Vicryl would NOT be good for this.
In conclusion:
The sutures seen below are the most common 'rapidly' absorbable kinds. Many surgeons may never have occasion to use them, but some do.
There are a few sutures that are moderately fast absorbing (like Monocryl or Caprosyn), but none absorb as fast as these.
⬛️
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
🧵regarding Lord of the Rings - related traumatic injuries, and whether access to modern Level 1 trauma centers could have decreased morbidity and mortality within the Fellowship.
Here we will take a more evidence-based approach to some of the injuries in Middle Earth (1/ )
Background:
Though nominally successful in is main task, the Fellowship still had an unacceptably high mortality rate (2/9 or 22%), and one of the survivors was left with chronic injuries and PTSD (11%).
The question is whether this could be improved with modern Trauma care.
Boromir initially sustains a penetrating L upper chest injury.
Injured structures are likely to include the L lung and the L subclavian vessels. The L subclavian arterial injury is a classic Trauma fellow question and repair is challenging to say the least. But survivable.
A simple but effective tool for cutting bone. As usual, we'll go over its design, how to use it, and why such a basic device still exists in the surgical toolbox in 2026.
We'll also cover its history and the tragic fate of Leonardo Gigli. (1/ )
The main advantage of the Gigli saw is that it's simple. It's just a wire and 2 hooks.
It doesn't require any power or any other equipment and it can be used in austere environments. If you needed to, you could amputate a leg out in the wilderness with a Gigli saw.
The technique is simple. The saw blade is dragged back and forth to cut the bone. It helps if you keep the momentum going and try to minimize 'stopping'.
Also, try to use most of the length of the blade instead of just the middle part, or this part will overheat and break.
The more things change, the more they stay the same.
I found commentary from a 1967 edition of Look magazine that sounds...familiar.
First: junior doctor dissatisfaction and low pay, and UK physicians leaving for elsewhere: (1/ )
It has always been the case that though much of the conversation has to do with pay, that the true causes of discontent are more complex than that. Again, this was noted more than 50 years ago:
It was noted at the time (once again: 1967) that the practice of having doctors in training move around every few months was a problem. Which I'm gathering, remains an issue.
Temporary shunts for vascular trauma have actually been around for >100 yr. The first widespread use likely began with Prof. Tuffier in France, who used them in wounded soldiers in WW1 (1914-18).
The strategy was different though... (1/ )
Formal vascular repair had been described by Carrel, but was impractical in war conditions due to practically all wounds having massive contamination and delayed presentation, which made the vessels more friable and difficult to suture.
Bernheim had a famous quote on this:
Transport times were much longer then, and most of the wounded who were going to die by exsanguination had already done that.
So instead, the main problem of vascular injury at the time was probably thrombosis of the injured vessel with ischemia of the distal tissues.