🧵regarding the 'rapidly absorbable' sutures, which are used less often than other suture types, but fill specific roles in a number of different surgical specialties.
We'll go over the uses of (and differences between) Chromic, plain gut, 'fast' gut, and Vicryl Rapide.
(1/)
Catgut has been used for suturing for many centuries, but it first became industrialized by the German company B Braun.
It is not (and probably never was) made from cats; instead it comes from the serosal layer of beef intestine or the submucosal layer of sheep intestine.
Catgut sutures are strands of ~90% collagen that are purified and chemically processed.
Because collagen is a protein, the longevity of the sutures is very much affected by any proteolytic enzymes in the local environment. We'll see why this is important later.
Surgeons recognized that plain catgut sutures simply did not last long enough for most purposes.
'Chromic' gut sutures were invented by Lister in 1881 in an attempt to solve this problem. By treating the catgut with chromic salts, it lasted longer.
Since Chromic is the variety of gut suture that is most often used, we'll start with it.
The collagen strands are treated with chromic acid salts, giving them a brownish color, and the strands last much longer. The process also makes them stronger than 'plain gut' sutures.
Chromic suture feels quite stiff when you're tying with it, but it 'sets down' extremely well.
When you 'set' down a throw, it tends to stay there...more so than for any other suture material.
Due to the high friction, there is minimal need for slip knots or surgeon's knots.
Chromic suture 'sets' down well and has excellent knot security, but because it's stiff, you will have to have good square knot technique, because the Chromic suture is less forgiving than others if the knots aren't tied right.
I usually tie 5 knots with chromic sutures.
In the early 20th century, when Chromic was practically the only absorbable suture available, it was used for almost everything that you would now use synthetic sutures like Vicryl or PDS for.
It was used for all types of GI, GU, GYN, orthopedic, and many other operations.
Chromic sutures are strong, but only for only 10-14 days, so when would they be used today?
They're used for rapidly healing tissues in places where you want them to disappear quickly.
Its most common use is probably in ENT operations, but it is also used in urology, dentistry, and occasionally in OB/GYN (for episiotomies and the "B-Lynch" suture.
In trauma surgery, 0 or #1 Chromic sutures are used to suture some of simpler, more linear liver lacerations.
In this case we're not really using it because of the properties of Chromic suture itself, but more likely because it comes on this huge, blunt point ("BP" needle).
Now for 'plain gut' sutures.
Plain gut sutures are not treated with chromic acid salts. They don't last as long (7-10 days or even less) and they also are not as strong as Chromic.
So they're used when you *want* them to dissolve quickly (and you don't have to cut them out).
The use of 'plain gut' sutures seems to be almost all in head and neck procedures. Our 'ENT' cart stocks them.
They are used for facial lacerations and for many types of ENT, oral, dental, and eyelid surgery, where removal of the sutures would be difficult or impractical.
There is also a 'fast absorbing' plain gut suture that is heat-treated so that it lasts even *less* time than plain gut. It is also a little weaker.
Fast absorbing plain gut only comes in one size (5-0 for Ethicon) and is used only for skin closures (usually on the face).
Catgut-based sutures (like 'chromic' gut and plain gut) have been banned for many years in the EU, Japan, and possibly elsewhere due to the theoretic risk of transmitting Bovine Spongiform Encephalopathy, though no cases of this have happened.
They remain in use in the U.S.
Before we leave catgut-based sutures, I had mentioned that proteolytic enzymes break down the collagen strands that make up the suture.
In areas where there is ⬆️proteolytic enzyme activity, like the mouth, the sutures will dissolve faster than they would if placed on the skin.
Finally, there is Vicryl Rapide.
Vicryl Rapide is often used when a rapidly absorbing suture is desired, and gut-based sutures are not available or the surgeon does not want to use them.
It is made by irradiating the same polyglactin 910 polymer used for 'normal' Vicryl.
Vicryl Rapide and 'regular' Vicryl sutures look the same and feel the same when you're tying with them...but they are NOT the same sutures and they may NOT be used interchangeably.
Vicryl Rapide will lose its strength in only 7-10 days, unlike 'regular' Vicryl (~3 weeks).
Just to emphasize this point again and give examples:
'Regular' Vicryl sutures are fine for bowel anastomoses but Vicryl Rapide would definitely **NOT** be suitable.
Vicryl Rapide is good for closing certain skin incisions but 'regular' Vicryl would NOT be good for this.
In conclusion:
The sutures seen below are the most common 'rapidly' absorbable kinds. Many surgeons may never have occasion to use them, but some do.
There are a few sutures that are moderately fast absorbing (like Monocryl or Caprosyn), but none absorb as fast as these.
⬛️
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
🧵regarding the 117 deaths in The Iliad where Homer provided details about the mechanism of injury:
Here we will run an M&M conference to consider whether these deaths might have been preventable if the Achaeans and Trojans had modern Level 1 trauma centers at the time. (1/ )
Background:
Recently, I read 'The Iliad' and noticed how often Homer described deaths with anatomic detail.
I then decided to look at these cases as though they occurred near a modern Level 1 trauma center with full capabilities.
Butler's 1898 English translation was used.
Methods:
Assumptions and simplifications included:
- The Achaeans and Trojans each have their own trauma centers
- rapid 'scoop and run' prehospital transport
- the cases present individually, and there are no 'mass casualty' scenarios that would overwhelm the system.
We'll go over basic concepts about knots and how to tie the '1-handed' knot.
We will also explore why one of the 'throws' is harder than the other, and a different way to do it that may be new to many who trained in surgery in the U.S. (1/ )
First, let's look at a few basics common to all square knots.
All of the different 'throws' involve creating a loop and then passing one of the two strands through the loop.
What we call '2-handed' or '1-handed' knots are just ways we've learned to do this. Nothing more.
In fact for 2-handed knots, both of the 'throws' follow the same idea:
You are creating a loop, and then passing the string in your nondominant hand through the loop (the green string).
The only thing that differs between the two throws is your initial starting position.
This one is for students and 1st-year residents. 2-handed tying is becoming a lost art in surgery, but I believe it is important to learn.
We'll start here with just the basic steps. More advanced concepts will come later.
(1/)
If you want your first knot to be square, you generally don't want to start off with uncrossed strings (L picture). Instead, it's better to *cross* the two strings first before you start tying the knot (R picture).
There are 2 ways to 'cross' the strings, which we'll see next.
When I do my initial crossing of strings, you'll see it can be done in one of two ways:
Either the L string can be on top, or the R string can be on top.
I can pick either one, but the one I choose will dictate which 'half' of the 2-handed technique I'll need to do first.
Upgrading a prior 🧵regarding polypropylene ('Prolene') suture: the workhorse suture of vascular surgery, though it also has other applications.
As usual, we'll go over some of the properties and uses of Prolene, and a little history. (1/ )
Polypropylene sutures (I'll keep calling them 'Prolene' for the thread) were invented in 1969 and the US patent was approved in 1971. The patent was mostly based on a novel method of preparing monofilament polypropylene into a material that could actually be used for sutures.
In this case I'll skip my customary list of what each size is used for, as it doesn't make for good reading.
Basically, Prolene can be found in sizes from 0 to 10-0. Needles are of different sizes and are often double-armed. They are usually dyed blue to increase visibility.
🧵regarding the Kocher clamp (or 'forceps' if you prefer).
The 'Kocher' is an instrument used by a wide variety of surgical specialists for a number of different things.
Here we will go over its properties and uses, and there will be more than the usual amount of history.
(1/)
Before we start: I should point out that the terms 'forceps' and 'clamp' are used in an imprecise and random manner, both in scholarship and by industry.
The instrument we'll be talking about is alternatively described as a 'Kocher forceps' or 'Kocher clamp'. I'll use both.
As I've said before, Theodor Kocher was a fascinating and influential figure in early surgical history. In my opinion, however many things are named for Kocher, there should be even more things.
Originally, there seem to have been 2 separate 'Kocher' forceps that later merged.