Thomas Zimmer Profile picture
Mar 4 14 tweets 3 min read Read on X
The best argument for applying “American fascism” as an analytical framework to Trump / Trumpism is the fact that it emphasized - rather than dismissed or sanitized - these fascistic elements from the start and rightfully diagnosed an acute threat to democracy.

🧵1/ Screenshot of a Bluesky post from @sethcotlar.bsky.social: “Seven years ago, less than a month after taking office, Trump was already in full Lügenpresse mode.”
Meanwhile, the people who have proudly taken on the mantle of “Guardians Against Liberal Alarmism and Hysteria” have offered a lot of sneering condescension - while being wrong about Trumpism and what’s happening on the American Right almost every step of the way. 2/
It goes far beyond just Trump, of course: “Thought leaders” on the Right keep calling for a radical counterrevolution of the rightfully aggrieved against the sinister forces of leftism that are supposedly threatening the nation’s survival… 3/
All strands of the Right – GOP officials, the media machine, reactionary intellectuals, the conservative base – are openly and aggressively embracing rightwing vigilante violence against “the Left”… 4/
Significant portions of the Right are clamoring for a revolutionary leader who promises that he alone can return the nation to glory by violently purging it from globalist, leftist enemies and restore the rule of the *real* people.

Fascism is an adequate term for that. 5/
The fake-indignation over people applying the term “fascism” to factions on the Right is just silly – as is denying the fact that making common cause with extremism has fully moved to the center of conservative politics, which constitutes an acute threat to American democracy. 6/
Yes, it’s important to emphasize the specific historical circumstances that led to the rise of fascism in Europe’s interwar period, and it’s crucial to keep those in mind when using the term in any political context. 7/
But it does not follow that whoever speaks of fascism in America must be ignorant of fascism’s history. All too often, those who vehemently oppose the use of the term in a U.S. context betray an inadequate understanding of the actual state of conservative / rightwing politics. 8/
It’s certainly worth reflecting on the exact nature of Trumpian fascism in comparison to both the phenomena that arose in Europe’s interwar period as well as previous iterations of the more specifically American fascistic tradition. 9/
It’s also important to debate the place of Trumpian fascism in relation to other factions on the American Right, its specific role in the context of the broader rightwing counter-mobilization against egalitarian, multiracial, pluralistic democracy. 10/
Applying the fascism concept is not the same as using facile historical analogies to Hitler. Rather than just referencing the rise of the Nazis and fascism in Europe’s interwar period all the time, we should investigate domestic traditions of fascism and rightwing extremism. 11/
The latest research on the history of modern U.S. conservatism and the American Right very much emphasizes those importance of domestic far-right extremist and fascistic traditions, and most serious historians agree that Trumpism needs to be situated in that context. 12/
At some point during the Trump presidency, most good-faith observers crossed the line from “Not sure, maybe go easy on the fascism claims” to “Trumpism clearly qualifies as a specifically American, specifically 21st-century version of fascism.”

It’s gotten way worse since. 13/
We are certainly past the point where I would still consider it a reasonable, good-faith position to reject the use of the fascism concept outright and to deride anyone who does, who emphasizes fascistic tendencies on the Right, as ridiculously “alarmist.” It’s not serious. /end

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Thomas Zimmer

Thomas Zimmer Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @tzimmer_history

Mar 5
One more thought on the broader context of this: Many of the loudest pundits who oppose the idea of disqualifying Trump fundamentally reject the entire framework of describing Trump and his enablers in the Republican Party as a threat to democracy. They are dangerously wrong. 1/
Consequently, they reject the idea that the system is justified in treating the ex-president and MAGA extremists accordingly. Remember, for instance, the visceral reaction from people like Ross Douthat to Biden’s “soul of the nation” speech in Philadelphia in September 2022. 2/
The critique of the idea that politics was defined by a conflict between democratic forces, uniting behind the Democrats and against MAGA candidates across the country, and anti-democratic forces dominating the GOP peaked around the 2022 midterm elections. 3/
Read 13 tweets
Mar 4
The key question about Trump and January 6 - one most pundits celebrating the Court’s decision are arrogantly dismissing - concerns the demands and limits of democratic self-defense against extremism.

Re-posting this, in light of the Supreme Court’s ruling (link in bio):

🧵1/ Screenshot of my latest “Democracy Americana” newsletter: “Militant Democracy vs Donald Trump: Democracy is fated to fight those who assault it with one hand tied behind its back, lest it become that which it seeks to defeat. But fight it must – or it will perish.”
The idea that this SC ruling proves beyond doubt that those who derided the attempt to disqualify Trump were right - not just right in predicting the decision, but right on substance and in declaring there’s nothing to be done but “let the ballot box decide” - is ridiculous. 2/
Is the enforcement of the rules and restrictions laid out in the constitution optional? It’s hard not to notice how a lot of people seem to regard some parts of the constitution as a lot more binding than others, and are rather quick to discard the Reconstruction amendments. 3/
Read 12 tweets
Mar 2
Weekend reading: I wrote about what “Project 2025” wants to do to America.
 
“Project 2025” is designed as a grand battle plan for the Right’s open war against multiracial pluralism – and it will be on the ballot in November.
 
🧵1/
 
thomaszimmer.substack.com/p/what-project…
Screenshot of my latest “Democracy Americana” newsletter: “What ‘Project 2025’ Would Do to America: The Right has developed concrete plans to make America into a much nastier place for anyone who dares to deviate from the white Christian patriarchal order. That’s what is on the ballot in November”
This is Part II of my deep dive into “Project 2025”: A detailed dissection of the policy agenda they have produced and the plans to install an army of loyalists. They understand they weren’t ready during Trump’s first presidency. In 2025, they will be. 2/
“Project 2025” is evidence that the Right has concrete plans to take over and transform American government into a machine that serves only two purposes: exacting revenge on the “woke” enemy – and imposing a minoritarian reactionary vision on society. 3/
Read 5 tweets
Mar 1
“Project 2025” promises to restore former national glory by purging enemies and deviants from the nation.
 
Visceral disdain for any kind of pluralism and diversity channeled into a policy agenda aiming to extinguish it. That’s “Project 2025.”
 
New piece (link in bio):
 
🧵1/ Screenshot of my latest “Democracy Americana” newsletter: “What ‘Project 2025’ Would Do to America: The Right has developed concrete plans to make America into a much nastier place for anyone who dares to deviate from the white Christian patriarchal order. That’s what is on the ballot in November”
Expanding presidential power, establishing total control over the government, weaponizing some parts of the executive while dismantling others – that is the first big focus of “Project 2025,” as it crystallizes in the policy agenda for every department, every agency. 2/
The plans for the education sector are a good starting point to explore the desire to dismantle modern government. The very first sentence in this chapter of the “Project 2025” report unequivocally states that “the federal Department of Education should be eliminated.” 3/
Read 16 tweets
Mar 1
What “Project 2025” Would Do to America
 
The Right has developed concrete plans to make America into a much nastier place for anyone who dares to deviate from the white Christian patriarchal order. That’s what is on the ballot in November.
 
New piece (link in bio):
 
🧵1/ Screenshot of my latest “Democracy Americana” newsletter: “What ‘Project 2025’ Would Do to America: The Right has developed concrete plans to make America into a much nastier place for anyone who dares to deviate from the white Christian patriarchal order. That’s what is on the ballot in November”
What would a second Trump presidency look like? What happens if the Reactionary Right returns to power?
 
This is Part II of my deep dive into “Project 2025”: A detailed dissection of the policy agenda they have produced and their plans to install an army of loyalists. 2/
How seriously should we take “Project 2025”? Isn’t this all just the abstract raging of feverish minds? Just empty threats far removed from any chance of implementation? Mostly just a messaging effort intended to placate and mobilize a frenzied base? If only. 3/
Read 11 tweets
Feb 26
The perfect manifestation of the permission structure that governs rightwing politics:

Nikki Haley and Bill Barr both giving us versions of “Trump is totally unhinged, but I’m voting for him anyway, because Joe Biden is a radically Un-American woke leftist extremist.

🧵1/ Image
To justify sticking with Trump, conservatives find ever more extreme justifications for why he is, at worst, the lesser evil compared to the “leftist” enemy. That is partly why rightwingers are constantly playing up the threat of “woke” radicalism and the “illiberal Left.” 2/
The Democratic Party, in the Right’s understanding, is not just a political opponent, but an “Un-American” enemy – a fundamentally illegitimate political faction captured by the radical forces of leftism, liberalism, wokeism, and multiculturalism. 3/
Read 11 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us!

:(