Just this morning we released results from a poll I worked on in conjunction with @YouGov, and wow. A solid majority of Americans support ending arms shipments to Israel until it stops its attacks on #Gaza
1/6cepr.net/press-release/…
We specifically asked about stopping arms shipments to Israel, not a ceasefire, because “ceasefire” means so many different things to different people. “Stopping arms shipment” is specific and unambiguous.
We saw a big partisan divide in responses. Fully 62% of President Biden’s 2020 voters support halting arms shipments to Israel. Only 14% of Biden voters do not. This is his electoral base
Even a sizable minority (30%) of Republicans favor stopping arms shipments. But there is another result that the Biden campaign should be worried about: Of those who did not vote in the 2020 presidential election, fully 60% agreed that the U.S. should block weapons shipments. These are the voters Biden needs to turn out to expand his base.
All this is to say that the American public may have already moved past the idea of a “ceasefire.” We all see the images on TV. The heartache of 30,000+ dead– most of them women and children.
We have the power to stop this. Everyone knows that the U.S. could end this today if we wanted to. This is Josep Borell, the highest official of the European Union in charge of foreign policy, telling the United States government that they need to do something, like cut weapons transfers to Israel, to stop the mass killing of civilians by the Israeli military
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
1) No one should underestimate the change that the anti-racist protests sweeping the country are capable of producing. (Map below from New York Times):
2) The protests are already beginning to change how some of the media looks at the problem of institutionalized racist violence by police, e.g this from MSNBC:
They never did find any evidence of fraud in the October 20th election, but the media repeated the allegation so many times that it became "true," in this post-truth world. Thread:
The latest OAS "audit", repeats a major falsehood from their previous reports, pretending that there was an "unusual" jump in Evo's vote margin towards the end of the quick count. But the change was in fact gradual, as later-reporting areas were more pro-Evo than earlier ones:
THREAD: Bolivia held its presidential election on October 20th — and since then, there has been a lot of confusion around the vote tallying process, which is still ongoing. 1/x
There are two main candidates: Evo Morales, the current president, and Carlos Mesa, a former president.
Morales generally has higher support in rural areas, whereas Mesa has higher support in urban areas such as Santa Cruz de la Sierra. This is important to keep in mind. 2/x
There are potentially two rounds in the election. In the first round, if any candidate has either 1) more than 50% of the vote or 2) at least 40% of the vote, and a vote total that is 10 percentage points higher than the next highest candidate, they win outright. 3/x
Dear @RichardHass -- Here are some reasons for the reaction against your support of US intervention/coup in Venezuela 1) It is illegal under the UN Charter, the OAS Charter, and conventions which the US government has signed (see thenation.com/article/trumps… <thread continues>
2) The Trump financial embargo against Venezuela, also illegal under international law , is actively worsening the shortages of medicine and food and preventing most measures that would be needed to allow the economy to recover or alleviate these shortages
3) This is being done as part of a deliberate strategy to increase suffering in Venezuela so as to cause people there (including the military) to overthrow the government, which as been a goal of US policy for most of the last 16 years