views
Whyvert Profile picture
Mar 13 4 tweets 2 min read Read on X
Remarkable and high-quality Swedish study:

If men win the lottery, they marry and have children.

If women win the lottery, their fertility does not rise. (Indeed, low-income women get divorced.)

You might think more resources means more kids. Yes with men, not with women. Image
Maybe we need a society, as was the case in the baby boom, where men have sufficient resources to marry and reproduce. Image
This may help explain why some child subsidies (like cheap daycare or child benefits paid to the mother) do little or nothing to boost a country's fertility.
The authors have a brief column summarizing the study.

(Note that the effect on men's fertility is not huge.)

cepr.org/voxeu/columns/…

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Whyvert

Whyvert Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @whyvert

Mar 4
Jared Diamond's "Guns, Germs, and Steel" asks why Eurasia became more advanced than other areas of pre-modern farming (New Guinea, Africa, the Americas).

3 factors:

1. East-West orientation of Eurasia meant technologies could diffuse more easily (appears to be unsupported).
Eurasia is ecologically heterogeneous, so diffusion would not be more easy then elsewhere.

E.g. the river valley ecologies of early Civs are very different from most of the rest of Eurasia
2. Better plants and animals to domesticate (possibly exaggerated).

3. Afro-Eurasian diseases wreaked more havoc in the New World than American diseases wreaked in the Old World (very true, but not a new point).
Read 6 tweets
Feb 2
Rich countries don't have revolts, color revolutions, socialist revolutions, coups, civil wars, regime changes.
They keep what regime they have, democratic or autocratic.
Below: the World Bank's high income countries. Last time any had a regime change was when they were poor. Image
The rich Arab states were immune as revolts, revolutions, civil wars, and regime changes of the Arab Spring after 2011 affected the poorer ones.

(Libya was an edge case, fairly rich but had a revolt and civil war.)

Red is high income. Image
Socialist revolutions were supposed to happen in the most advanced and rich capitalist states.
They didn't. They happened in poorer countries.
Read 9 tweets
Jan 16
Canada is a fascinating experiment in high immigration.

Non-homeowners have suffered greatly from rising rent.
Income per person is stagnating. Image
Canada's unprecedented population growth Image
Read 5 tweets
Jan 7
Settler colonialism is trending.
Some current examples. 🧵

1. China. Settled loyal Han in disloyal Xinjiang (from 90s). Settled 1m loyal mainlanders in disloyal Hong Kong.

A road across Xinjiang's Taklamakan desert China built to entice settlers. Image
2. Indonesia. Settled about 300k loyal Javanese in West Papua. Many around the giant Grasberg gold and copper mine, which had been a target of attacks by Papuan independence activists. Image
West Papuans are not pleased. Image
Read 9 tweets
Jan 1
Anna Krylov, a chemistry professor, has published several pieces on how left/woke ideology is undermining science. Here's her latest.

She gives examples of four main issues:

1. Policing of language.

Ever longer list of forbidden words like "healthy weight". Image
2. Rewriting the history of science.

More and more scientists having their names stricken from buildings, textbooks, awards, etc.

Some examples: Image
3. Suppression of viewpoints and research results.

Paper retractions, censorship of valid research.

E.g. in 2022, Nature Human Behaviour (NHB) published an editorial stating that the journal will not publish valid research that the editors consider ‘harmful’ to groups.
Read 7 tweets
Oct 29, 2023
Few countries enjoy cooperativeness. A 🧵

1. Corruption. Everyone recognizes that corruption is antisocial, but it persists. Most countries cannot uproot it to become more prosocial.

There's a Pattern: NW Euros + offshoots and Japan are low. (Plus scattered others.) Image
2. Economic freedom.

In most of the world, people find it easier to collaborate more in nepotistic groups or patron-client networks than in free markets.

The Pattern reappears (NW Euros + Maritime East Asians). Image
3. Trust.

Essential foundation of cooperativeness.

Self-reported trust in strangers shows mostly The Pattern (except for high self-report in China).

(Self-report is not the ideal measure of trust.) Image
Read 9 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us!

:(