We're still a couple of weeks away from Easter, but the crappy "aCksHuLLy, eAsTer iz pAgan!" memes have begun already. No, actually, it isn't.
The date of Easter is not based on any pagan festival and there is no such festival that fell on the *very* specific date in ... t.co/gkALXSAHKU
... question: the first Sunday after the first full moon on or after 21 March - a fixed approximation of the March equinox. Easter falls on this date for purely Christian and Jewish reasons. The gospels says Jesus died and rose at Passover. So Christians began celebrating ...
... this at Passover, in line with the Jewish lunar calendar, which is where the full moon after the March equinox part comes from. But this led to some Christians celebrating it *on* the Passover, while others celebrated it on a Sunday around Passover, since the gospels said ...
... Jesus rose on the Sunday after his death. Thus the formula above came to be established to make sure it was always celebrated on a Sunday. No pagan festivals came into the calculation at all.
This is also why most European languages call Easter by some name derived from ...
... the Greek form of the word for Passover: Πάσχα ("Pascha").
The two exceptions to this are German ("Ostern") and English ("Easter"). These are, *very indirectly*, connected to the Anglo-Saxon goddess Eostre. The ONE reference we have to her - Bede's *De temporum ratione*, XV - tells us the Anglo-Saxon month that corresponds to April ...
... was called "Eostremonath" (Eostre Month) because "feasts in her honour" were held in that month. We have no more information about these "feasts" and have no idea exactly when they were held, but they were not the origin of the date of Easter (see above), which was ...
... well-established centuries before the Anglo-Saxons converted to Christianity. The feast day just got its name from the month in which it usually fell and so was *indirectly* derived from the shadowy goddess. The German word "Ostern" may have a similar origins or - more ...
... likely - was imported from Anglo-Saxon England, since western Germany was converted to Christianity by Anglo-Saxon missionaries.
Again, we have precisely ONE reference anywhere to this goddess whose month gave Easter its English name and that is the sum total of information
... we have about here. Here it is:-
That's it. Nothing about "fertility", no eggs and no bunnies. Anyone who claims they are connected to Easter because of her is making up total crap.
The origin of the eggs is the fact that Catholics couldn't eat eggs in Lent and so had lots of them to indulge in on Easter ...
... Sunday. The Easter Bunny is a very modern development from an earlier German folk tradition about the "Osterhase" (Easter Hare), which was one of a number of animals associated with Easter, including the Easter Fox, Easter Stork and Easter Goose. These are all animals ...
... became more active in early spring and so became associated with Easter. Again, nothing pagan.
And I discuss this with @andrewmarkhenry of Religion for Breakfast here:-
And Andrew has his own video on it all here:-
The claims that Easter derives from some pagan festival and was a pagan fertility festival involving eggs and bunnies is all total and complete garbage. And people like @DLgodlessbitch need to STOP perpetuating this nonsense.
Oh no! @DLgodlessbitch seems to have got shy from all the attention this thread's interactions have given their silly meme and they have now blocked me. That's no fun. 😏😉
@DLgodlessbitch 😢😢😢😢
Addendum: @andrewmarkhenry has a new video that goes into more detail on why the Easter Bunny is not pagan:
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
No sensible person would get their history from the BBC drama *Rogue Heroes*, which tells a slightly fanciful, "boys own adventure" version of the beginnings of the SAS in WWII. The show itself warns in its credits that it isn't really history. But its depiction of a Nazi flag...
... in a Catholic Church in Sicily and the commentary on this by Lt. Paddy Mayne is likely to reinforce some myths about the Church and the Nazis and probably tells us more about writer Steven Knight's attitudes rather than anything historical.
The book by ...
... Ben Macintyre on which the series is (loosely) based, gives a brief account of the capture of Augusta by the SAS/SRS raiders, with some amusing anecdotes about their celebrations, but nothing at all about this church incident. So it appears to be a pure fiction of Knight's.
Tis the season for weak apologetics to try and get around the historical issues with the Infancy Narratives in gMatt and gLuke: i.e. what the great Jewish scholar Geza Vermes called "exegetical acrobatics". This guy Huff doesn't actually make a strong case for any particular ...
... way to get around the ten year discrepancy between the two gospel accounts of Jesus' birth, he just throws out about three and hopes one of them is convincing - a kind of scattergun technique.
The essential problem here is that the gLuke account says Jesus was born during ...
... census of P. Sulpicius Quirinius, which was held when the Romans annexed the territories of Herod Archelaus after he was deposed in 6 AD. However gMatt has Archelaus' father, Herod the Great, as an active player in its alternative version of Jesus' birth. But Herod the ...
The idea that the "real" cause of the 1633 trial of Galileo was that "he was a huge dick to the Pope" is not the most egregious myth about the Galileo Affair, but it's still essentially wrong. The frustrating thing is that it's almost right and is often argued as a counter ...
... to other, more common and more erroneous myths. But it's wrong.
The claim is that the Church didn't really care about the scientific debate (true, up to a point) and were happy to leave Galileo to speculate along with other astronomers (also true, up to a point), but ...
... the real problem was Galileo put Pope Urban's arguments in the mouth of the character of Simplicio in his *Dialogue*. This could be interpreted as meaning "the simpleton/fool" and so the pope got angry and hauled Galileo before the Inquisition to punish him.
It's rare for me to have to correct overly *positive* claims about the Middle Ages - usually I have to deal with the old "Dark Ages" myths. This meme gets some things right, overstates others and goes a bit bonkers on a few more. Taking each claim in turn: 1. True. At least, ...
... far more common than the pop history/Hollywood cliche that people didn't bathe at all. Bath houses did a brisk business, bathing in rivers was common in warm weather and baths were enjoyed at home by the more wealthy. And washing is not the same thing as bathing. People ...
... washed daily. So, so far so good. 2. This one needs qualifiers. There is good evidence that several of the beliefs that formed the much later conception of "witchcraft" were rejected as pagan/peasant superstitions by early medieval churchmen. These included women who were ...
Okay, so I've decided not to go the nuclear option and leave this crap hole completely. I'll stay here and keep fighting the fight against bad history. But it seems the #Xodus is real and the "Place Where Skies Are Blue" has become a geniunely great place for discussion of ...
... history, scholarship and books - minus the ads, Nazis. weirdos, conspiracists and AI sludge. I'm still not sure how I'll use this new platform and probably, as it grows, it will need vigorous debunking of bad history there as well. But, for now, I really like it as a ...
... clean, smart, friendly, loon-free version of what this place used to be long ago. So come join me there. I'm up to 880+ followers there with minimal posts and not much interaction. If you follow me here, please follow me there and let's make this work. Thanks everyone.
Once again Space Karen's "X"/Twitter has served up some utter weirdness. Yesterday the algorithm gave me this strange claim with a screenshot of some kind of journal article. 🧵
Okay, any tweet with the words "... the Roman Empire collapsed because ... " should immediately set off a historian's alarm bells. When it's followed by something that looks statistics-based or generally sciencey, the bells should ring louder. A quick look at the account ...
... of this "vittorio" person confirmed what I suspected - his feed (with 35k followers) consisted of climate change denial, Jordan Peterson stuff, Elon/Tesla worship and pro-Trump stuff. 🙄So, *cave canem*.
But the screenshots he posted had me baffled (see below).