Breeauna Sagdal Profile picture
Mar 13 1 tweets 2 min read Read on X
🚨🚨🚨 VERY CONCERNING-WH Emergency Declaration- TikTok Trojan Horse 🚨🚨🚨

The White House issued an Emergency Declaration by Executive Order on Feb. 28, 2024 specifying authority and definitions ahead of H.R 7521 passing! If this bill passes tomorrow, ALL of the following will be applicable;

Covered Person-
"OR ANY person designated by the Attorney General being owned or controlled by or subject to the jurisdiction or direction of a country of concern, as acting on behalf of or purporting to act on behalf of a country of concern or other covered person, or as knowingly causing or directing, directly or indirectly, a violation of this order or any regulations implementing this order."

Basically, a "covered person" is whomever the AG decides...

There's more!

The E.O. allows the definition of "country of concern" to be changed at any time. No wonder FISA 702 hasn't been reformed!
"...with the concurrence of the Secretary of State and the Secretary of Commerce, to identify new or remove existing countries of concern and, as appropriate, classes of covered persons for the purposes of this order."

Even worse, this applies to US, VPN'S and Crypto mining. Allows for authority to be delegated to Homeland Security and DOD=domestic!

"(k) In regulations issued by the Attorney General under this section, the Attorney General may prohibit United States persons from knowingly directing transactions if such transactions would be prohibited transactions under regulations issued pursuant to this order if engaged in by a United States person."

VPN ILLEGAL
"(i) Any transaction or other activity that has the purpose of evading or avoiding, causes a violation of, or attempts to violate any of the prohibitions promulgated pursuant to this section is prohibited."

DELEGATION OF AUTHORITY
"(L) The Attorney General may, consistent with applicable law, redelegate any of the authorities conferred on the Attorney General pursuant to this section within the Department of Justice. The Secretary of Homeland Security may, consistent with applicable law, redelegate any of the authorities conferred on the Secretary of Homeland Security pursuant to this section within the Department of Homeland Security."

Thank you @Jenn_McW for pointing this out. This Emergency Declaration is extremely concerning, and like Massie has said, H.R. 7521 is the "Trojan Horse," or vehicle to implement the rest.

whitehouse.gov/briefing-room/…Image

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Breeauna Sagdal

Breeauna Sagdal Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @Breeauna9

Apr 21
🚨🚨🚨SO IT BEGINS🚨🚨🚨

GUILTY UNLESS PROVEN INNOCENT- The Contents of Konstantin Malofeyev’s Bank Account Sent to Ukraine...

On April 4, 2022, a Southern District of New York grand jury, under SEALED INDICTMENT, indicted Malofeyev with "conspiracy to violate the International Emergency Economic Powers Act" (“IEEPA”), 50 U.S.C. § 1705. (IEEPA was again reauthorized and expanded to encompass ALL online transactions, under the Biden Administration, on Feb. 28, 2024—days before the House passed the TikTok forced divestiture bill 7521.)

The U.S. sought forfeiture of the approximately $5.4 million, held in the Texas based Sunflower Bank account under the authority of 18 U.S.C. § 981(c) for "violations of IEEPA."

On February 2, 2023, the U.S. sought a judgment of forfeiture, United States v. $5,379,876.94, DE 6 (S.D.N.Y. Feb. 2, 2023), which the district court granted the SAME DAY, Id. at DE 8 (S.D.N.Y. Feb. 2, 2023).

In addition to $45 billion in the Additional Ukraine Supplemental Appropriations of 2023, Congress provided authority for forfeited cash, and the proceeds from the sale of forfeited assets from individuals listed on the OFAC "Blocked Persons" list, alledged of "violating certain U.S. laws and/or subject to U.S. sanctions," to be used to fund the Ukrainian proxy war—outside of an official declaration of war by Congress!!!

"While Konstantin Malofeyev’s case involves the first actual transfer of Russian-Oligarch-related assets sent to Ukraine, it will not be the last.

"In fact, the Biden Administration’s ability to supplement foreign aid to Ukraine with Russian Oligarchs’ assets may prove to incentivize Justice Department forfeiture actions involving 'covered forfeited property.'”


HR 7521, the supposed "TikTok Ban" is actually expanded centralized authority to the POTUS, under sanctions laws, to force the sale of private property (tangible and intangible).

According to the language of H.R 7521, Section (g)(c)”Definitions” the bill applies to;

“a person subject to the direction or control of a foreign person or entity.” When the President determines that a person or entity poses a risk to national security, the President merely needs to issue a public notice via OFAC of impacted entities, and then notify Congress 30 days prior, "outlining a classified annex and description of assets that must be divested" (sold).

As we've just seen with Malofeyev, indictments are sealed, until after the judgement!

To review, literally anyone can be alleged of IEEPA violations, or U.S law violations, indicted under seal, have their property and assets seized, and then sold in order to fund undeclared wars for indefinite periods of time.

And when there's no more "Russian oligarchy" money left in the U.S? Yet, precedent has been set???.... Which enemy will the Biden Administration go after next? Who's assets will be seized next?

Maybe your own, if alleged of being "subject to the direction or control of a foreign person or entity.”

And so it begins...lewisbrisbois.com/newsroom/legal…
@ReadeAlexandra @RealBookerScott @xAlphaWarriorx @Andreafreedom76
Ugh, whose* assets will be seized next... sorry for the typo.
Read 7 tweets
Apr 6
🚨🧵THE WAR ON MEAT, IS A WAR ON PRIVATE PROPERTY AND THE VALUE OF THE DOLLAR🧵🚨

Seasoned Veterinarians and livestock producers, alike, have been scratching their respective heads trying to understand the media's response to the avian flu. Headlines across every major news outlet warns of humans becoming infected with the “deadly” bird flu, after one reported case of pink-eye in a human.

The entire narrative is predicated upon a long disputed claim that COVID-19 was the result of a zoonotic jump—the famed Wuhan bat wet-market theory.

While the source of Covid is hotly contested within the scientific community, the policy vehicle at the center of this dialectic began years prior to Sars-Cov-2 and is quite resolute in force and effect.

In 2016, the Gates Foundation donated to the World Health Organization to create the OneHealth Initiative. Since 2020, the CDC has adopted and implemented the OneHealth Initiative to build a “collaborative, multisectoral, and transdisciplinary approach—working at the local, regional, national, and global levels—with the goal of achieving optimal health outcomes recognizing the interconnection between people, animals, plants, and their shared environment.”

In the aftermath of COVID-19, the OneHealth Initiative began taking shape, due largely in part to millions of tax dollars appropriated through ARP (American Rescue Plan) funding.

Through its APHIS (Animal and Plant Health Investigation System) the USDA (United States Department of Agriculture) was given $300M in 2021 to begin implementing “a risk-based, comprehensive, integrated disease monitoring and surveillance system domestically…to build additional capacity for zoonotic disease surveillance and prevention,” globally.

“The One Health concept recognizes that the health of people, animals, and the environment are all linked,” said USDA Under Secretary for Marketing and Regulatory Programs Jenny Lester Moffitt.

According to the USDA's press release, the Biden-Harris Administration's OneHealth approach will also help to ensure “new markets and streams of income for farmers and producers using climate smart food and forestry practices,” by “making historic investments in infrastructure and clean energy capabilities in rural America.”

In other words, the federal government is using regulatory enforcement to intervene in the marketplace, in addition to subsidizing corporations with tax dollars to direct a planned economic outcome—ending meat consumption.
usda.gov/media/press-re…
Climate-Smart Commodities - Planning the Economy through Subsidized Intervention.

Under the recently announced Climate-Smart Commodities program, the USDA has appropriated $3.1B in tax subsidies to one hundred and forty-one new private Climate-Smart projects, ranging from carbon sequestration to Climate-Smart meat and forestry practices.

Private investors such as Amazon founder Jeff Bezos - who just committed $1B to the development of lab cultured meat-like molds, and meat grown in petri dishes, to
Ballpark, formerly known for its hotdogs, but is now harvesting python meat - are all rushing to cash in on this new industry, and the OneHealth/USDA certification program.
usda.gov/climate-soluti…
Culling The Herd - Regulatory Intervention in the Marketplace

Meanwhile, the last vestiges of America’s food freedom and decentralized food sources, are quietly being targeted by the full force of the federal government.

The once voluntary APHIS System, is poised to become the mandatory APHIS-15, which among many other changes, “the system will be renamed Animal Health, Disease, and Pest Surveillance and Management System, USDA/APHIS-15. This system is used by APHIS to collect, manage, and evaluate animal health data for disease and pest control and surveillance programs.”

Among those “many changes” that APHIS-15 is undergoing, one should be of particular interest to the public—the removal of all references to the voluntary* Bovine Johne's Disease Control Program.

“Updating the authority for maintenance of the system to remove reference to the Bovine Johne's Disease Control Program.”

In addition to removing references to the once voluntary herd culling program, the USDA is also implementing mandatory RFID ear tags in cattle and bison.

According to the USDA/APHIS-15, expanded authority places disease tracing in their jurisdiction and the radio frequency ear tags are necessary for the “rapid and accurate recordkeeping for this volume of animals and movement,” which they say “is not achievable without electronic systems.”

The notice clearly spells out that RFID tags “may be read without restraint as the animal goes past an electronic reader.”

“Once the reader scans the tag, the electronically collected tag number can be rapidly and accurately transmitted from the reader to a connected electronic database.”

However, Industry leaders and lawmakers alike, have said the database will be used to track vaccination history, movement, and that this data may be used to impact the market rate of cattle and bison at time of processing.
federalregister.gov/documents/2024…
Read 7 tweets
Mar 24
🚨🧵Sanctions, Economic Fascism, and The Slow Road to “Owning Nothing”🚨🧵

Giovanni Gentile, was a neo-Hegelian philosopher, and the intellectual author of the “doctrine of fascism,” which he co-authored with Benito Mussolini. Influenced by Hegel, Nietzsche, and Karl Marx, Gentile believed that all private action should serve the state's interests.

“Fascism is a form of socialism, in fact, it is its most viable form,” Gentile wrote in his economic postulates, while defending compulsory state corporatism.

Gentile, like Mussolini, understood that a free society would not accept an authoritarian (state centered) regime, without incremental steps and the correct framing or socially engineered messaging to garner tacit agreement from the public.

Among the most prominent forms of economic fascism is the centralized authority to direct and plan the economy, trade, or commerce through restrictive and coercive methods. Centralization is defined as a sole individual, or a limited number of unelected individuals, who have been delegated the authority to control or manipulate the market—typically framed as a necessity for national security or for the welfare of the public (collective).

“Government alone,” Mussolini insisted, “is in the right position to see things from the point of view of the general welfare.” The government’s responsibility is to determine how much money is invested, how and where it should be invested and how the results will be judged.

In Italy after 1925, this was accomplished through the administrative state (the state within the state), such as the National Fascist Confederation of Industry, the National Fascist Confederation of Agriculture, the National Fascist Confederation of Commerce and the National Fascist Confederation of Banking.
After 40 years of Chevron doctrine being upheld in the United States, “highly trained experts” within administrative agencies have been given such deference to interpret the laws passed by Congress, it's now generally accepted among scholars that these agencies have the authority to promulgate new rules, beyond the scope of what Congress intended.

Citing the constitutional basis for the legality of American fascism (the interstate commerce clause, and preemptive doctrine), attorney Charlotte Twight, examines the economic consequences of interventions in her 2002 book Dependent on D.C.: The Rise of Federal Control over the Lives of Ordinary Americans. Outlined are the affects of the administrative state, such as: licensing, regulation, and rate making; product control; increasing the power of the executive branch; control over labor and agriculture; import-​export and foreign exchange controls.
For the purpose of H.R 7521, the so-called “TikTok Ban,” we will zero-in on the aforementioned affects of the administrative state, bearing in mind the framework of economic fascism and social engineering.

According to a Nov. 6, 2023 Congressional Report, entitled “Sanctions Primer: How the United States Uses Restrictive Mechanisms to Advance Foreign Policy or National Security Objectives,” the number of Specially Designated Nationals (SDNs) has risen by 900 percent since 2000, as the U.S increasingly uses sanctions as a weapon.

“Restricting Economic Transactions and Use of Financial Services The President is authorized to impose a variety of economic and financial restrictions pursuant to
enacted statute directing the imposition of sanctions, such as under IEEPA during a declared national emergency.”

It should be noted that President Joseph R.Biden declared just such an emergency on Feb. 28, 2024, days before H.R 7521, the so-called TikTok ban, was introduced, then passed by the House.

The Report continues;
“The Department of the Treasury’s
Office of Foreign Assets Control (OFAC) oversees such restrictions, often in coordination and consultation with other departments, as directed by the President through executive order. Restrictions often include
• blocking access to and prohibiting transactions related to property within the
jurisdiction of the United States of designated persons;
• prohibiting transactions between persons subject to U.S. jurisdiction and
designated individuals; and
• blocking access by designated individuals to the U.S. financial system.

“The executive branch or Congress may also prohibit or restrict investment by U.S. persons in foreign assets, or prohibit or restrict U.S. financial institutions from making loans or providing credits to designated persons.”
crsreports.congress.gov/product/pdf/R/…
Read 11 tweets
Mar 20
🚨🧵SECTION 721 WEAPONIZATION? IS THIS THE TRUTH ABOUT THE TIKTOK BILL? 🧵

In April 2022, Deputy U.S. Attorney General Lisa Monaco emphasised the centrality of national security to DOJ’s white collar enforcement efforts, noting in particular the enforcement of sanctions evasion and export control violations as a key part of deterring corporate crime, stating “one way to think about this is as sanctions being the new Foreign Corrupt Practices Act."

Lisa Monaco is said to have drafted H.R 7521, the TikTok bill.

Is Section 721 - US sanctions law - being weaponized against US citizens, companies, and crypto currency—like section 702 has been?

Monday, March 11, 2024,
"As part of the new Russian sanctions actions, the U.S. Department of the Treasury’s Office of Foreign Assets Control (OFAC) added almost 300 entities to its list of “Specially Designated Nationals” (the SDN List)."

"U.S. persons are prohibited from engaging in virtually all dealings involving SDNs."

The greatest risk is not to the notified SDN, but to the US citizen or entity that "knowingly, or unknowingly, directly or indirectly," transacts with a designated SDN.

Penalties for U.S persons violating sanctions carry 20 year prison sentences and up to 1 million dollars in fines per violation. Sound familiar? The language is nearly verbatim that of The Restrict Act.
@MikeBenzCyber


natlawreview.com/article/us-gov…
iclg.com/practice-areas…
Between 2023 and 2024 the Office of Foreign Assets Control (OFAC) added 1,000 new Specially Designated Nationals (SDNs) to its list.

However, in October of 2022 OFAC sent a very clear message to US companies when it fined a Bellevue, WA based virtual currency exchange $24 million and $29 million, respectively, to Bittrex, Inc. (Bittrex).

"COMPLIANCE IS NOT OPTIONAL"

Why?
"Bittrex had reason to know that these users were located in jurisdictions subject to sanctions. At the time of the transactions, however, Bittrex was not screening this customer information for terms associated with sanctioned jurisdictions. This information was not voluntarily self-disclosed."

So, for not adopting then recently created, OFAC screening standards, Bittrex was fined millions for allowing third party transactions in jurisdictions subject to sanctions. They should have known...

home.treasury.gov/news/press-rel…
Lawfirms are now advising their clients of the consequences of not knowing, because apparently it's just that easy to get caught into the net of those who "should have known."


Now, with Congressional Democrats setting their sights on X, and Elon Musk, perhaps it's time to start asking more questions about the use of sanctions for compliance. And perhaps, there's more to this TikTok bill that must be answered prior it passing.mofo.com/resources/insi…Image
Read 5 tweets
Mar 15
THREE DAYS AGO, WHILE MSM DEBATED TIKTOK, carefully steering the narrative to the Spooky CCP... THREE DAYS AGO, while the so-called "TIKTOK BAN" sailed through the House, after the RULES WERE SUSPENDED to pass it that quickly...

Once you realize that TikTok and its parent company Bytedance have been working WITH the Biden Administration and CFIUS for the last three years to become compliant, once you realize that On January 19, 2021, one day before President Biden assumed office, the US Department of Commerce (Commerce) published an interim final rule implementing its sweeping new authority to block, unwind, or condition "transactions" involving information and communications technology and services (ICTS), once you realize that TikTok's servers are in Texas, and then understand that the company already has an American board, and has already turned over ALL records of shareholders to the satisfaction of our federal government - then you start to understand the REAL target isn't TikTok - it's YOU via "X," Rumble, Gettr, Crypto, and so on down the line of non-compliant, divergent thought, content hubs and decentralized financial mechanisms.

Don't think it's possible? I have news for you. All it takes is an Executive Order declaring a National Security threat exists and invoking IEEPA (economic sanctions), like the Biden Administration did on Feb. 28, 2024—days before H.R 7521 passed out of the House. The seizure or freezing of assets can happen WHILE an investigation is being conducted, AND all an investigation requires is mere hearsay, or a small amount of evidence such as this below, in order to begin.

And so here we are. This is how it starts, saying the quiet parts out loud and laying the foundation for what comes neXt—the truth behind "the so-called TikTok ban" (H.R 7521). Because, the ultimate and uncomfortable truth is that the Free Market is the enemy of stakeholder capitalism, and stakeholder capitalism IS Economic Fascism!!! A system that exists to financially starve out dissenters, and those who fund "them" as opposed to "us."

Economic Fascism explained;

Time saver;
fee.org/articles/econo…
CFIUS final rule change;
arnoldporter.com/en/perspective…
Biden's Executive Order- National Emergency Authorization of IEEPA (International Economic Emergency Powers Act)
whitehouse.gov/briefing-room/…
Read 7 tweets
Jan 12
🧵 UN vs. Israeli/U.S Rights to Defense as "Oppressors"🧵

#1
"I hope you seek to dismantle the United States."

"Of the most oppressed a$$ people, indigenous women are like at the top of the f- ing list on Turtle Island."

#2

U.N Attorney, Francesca Albanese, claims a nation state has no right to self-defense if it's the "Oppressor."

Albanese then claims that Israel has no right to invoke article 51, right to self-defense, as it wages war against the oppressed.

#3

Article 51 UN Charter

legal.un.org/repertory/art5…
Image
Read 5 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us!

:(