The Cultural Tutor Profile picture
Mar 15, 2024 25 tweets 8 min read Read on X
On this day 2,068 years ago Julius Caesar was assassinated in broad daylight in the middle of Rome.

But it wasn't a mob or popular uprising — Caesar was killed by a group of disgruntled senators.

Here's how it happened, moment by moment, on that fateful day in 44 BC... Image
The year is 44 BC. Julius Caesar has been declared "Dictator for Life" and is now the most powerful man in the Roman Republic.

In 48 BC he had defeated Pompey the Great, another Roman general, and by 45 BC he had put down all resistance.

The civil wars were over; peace at last. Julius Caesar at the Rubicon by Gustave Boulanger (1854)
But a conspiracy was brewing.

The Senators were worried by how much power Caesar had amassed and — crucially — by how much the people loved him.

They feared that, if he hadn't already, Caesar would soon turn the Roman Republic into a kingdom ruled by one man.
So this was not an uprising of the people against a tyrant — it was a small conspiracy of aristocrats and senators, about sixty of them in all.

Why did they want to kill Caesar? There are two views.

The first is that they wanted to save the Republic from a populist tyrant.
Marcus Junius Brutus was the reluctant leader of this conspiracy. He had been on Pompey's side during the Civil War, but Caesar had granted him amnesty.

Brutus was conflicted between betraying the man who saved his life and protecting the sacred, ancient Roman Republic. Brutus by Émile Zipelius (1862)
The less idealistic view is that these Senators' political position was threatened by Caesar, who didn't need their support and might circumvent them completely.

Rather than Brutus' lofty and noble ambitions, perhaps the conspiracy was simply a question of power.
Either way, momentum reached fever pitch.

Too many people knew about the conspiracy; it would soon be uncovered; time was running out.

They considered killing him at the elections in the Campus Martius, but then Caesar announced a special Senate meeting on the Ides of March.
In the Roman calendar there were three dates in each month with special names.

For months with 31 days the 1st was called the Kalends, the 7th was called the Nones, and the 15th was called the Ides.

(For months with 30 days the Nones and Ides came two days earlier.)
The great Greek historian Plutarch noted the irony that it was at the Curia of Pompey, built by Caesar's greatest rival, that this meeting of the Senate was scheduled to take place.

The Curia was by the entrance of a large theatre also built by Pompey. Image
Nor was that the only twist of fate.

When Rome had been ruled by kings it was another Brutus who led the coup in 509 BC and established the Roman Republic.

Five hundred years later his descendent would try to save it. Bust of Lucius Junius Brutus by Ludovico Lombardo (1550)
It is the morning of the Ides of March, the 15th.

Brutus, dagger under his robe, leaves his wife Porcia for the meeting — she begs him not to go, terrified that it will end badly.

But he does. So the conspirators gather at the Curia of Pompey, waiting, waiting, waiting...
Caesar is late.

He remains at home all morning because of bad health, strange dreams, and troubling omens over the last few days.

Caesar is spooked and — urged by his wife — sends his right-hand man Mark Antony to postpone the Senate meeting. From Plutarch's Life of Julius Caesar in the Loeb Classical Library Edition (1919)
But Decimus Albinus, another of Caesar's allies, is part of the plot.

He reminds Caesar that it was he who called the meeting, and suggests the Senate intend to proclaim him king if he shows up.

Not to go would be an insult — and, to the people, it might make him look weak. Caesar Leaves for the Senate by Abel de Pujol (early 19th century)
Meanwhile, back at the Curia, the conspirators are barely hold their nerve.

Had the plot been revealed? From Plutarch's Life of Brutus in the Loeb Classical Library Edition (1919)
Caesar is coming.

Allegedly a soothsayer called Spurinna once told Caesar to "beware the Ides of March." On his way to the Senate Caesar sees Spurinna and mocks his prophecy, saying, "the Ides have come."

Spurinna replies, "they have come, but not yet gone."
Meanwhile Brutus receives a message to say his wife has died. She hadn't, as he later discovered, but he decides to remain anyway.

Finally Caesar arrives at the Curia.

But not without one final moment of panic, as the conspirators fear they are being outed: From Plutarch's Life of Brutus in the Loeb Classical Library Edition (1919)
Caesar enters the Curia.

Mark Antony is a fierce soldier who might have been able to protect him — Albinus delays Mark Antony outside; this was a crucial part of the plan.

Inside, Caesar is slowly surrounded by the Senators... The Murder of Caesar by Karl von Piloty (1865)
And then it happens.

Caesar is overwhelmed and cannot defend himself; he is stabbed twenty three times, saying nothing... until he realises Brutus is one of his attackers: From Suetonius' Lives of the Twelve Caesars in the Loeb Classical Library (1913)
Julius Caesar has been assassinated; Julius Caesar is dead. The Death of Julius Caesar by Vincenzo Camuccini (1798)
The conspirators leave his body and the next stage of their plan commences: to address the people, assuage their fears, establish order, and proclaim liberty for the Republic.

That is how they refer to themselves — as Liberators. The Death of Caesar by Jean-Léon Gérôme (1867)
But Rome is eerily silent — the conspirators disperse and barricade themselves at home.

Next day Brutus addresses the people. It goes well until Caesar's will is read by Mark Antony — he has left money to every single citizen.

A riot breaks out and the Curia is burned down. Mark Antony's Oration at Caesar's Funeral by George Edward Robertson (1834)
Antony's plan works perfectly.

The conspirators believe the people are against them and scale back their hopes for reform.

Antony urges peace, calms the people, and agrees a compromise whereby the conspirators are not punished but Caesar's laws and reforms remain valid.
But civil war eventually broke out and the conspirators were defeated in 42 BC by Mark Antony and Octavian, Caesar's heir.

After that came yet another civil war between Antony and Octavian.

Octavian won and in 27 BC became Augustus, the first Emperor — thus ensued Pax Romana. The Augustus of Prima Porta
The reputation of Caesar's assassins is mixed.

Many — even Romans — regarded Brutus as a symbol of liberty and courage.

But in Dante's Divine Comedy Brutus and Cassius are in the deepest part of Hell, eternally devoured alive in one of Satan's three mouths alongside Judas. Image
Whether Brutus was treacherous or noble, his plans failed — the Republic fell and Rome became an Empire.

So that's the 15th March 44 BC, one of those dates forever etched into the annals of history.

And the question remains: was Brutus a hero or a villain?

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with The Cultural Tutor

The Cultural Tutor Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @culturaltutor

Jun 19
This 143 year old church in Glasgow is going to be demolished and replaced with a block of 32 flats.

New homes are needed, but this is surely not the way to do it. Image
Image
The Hillhead Baptist Church in Glasgow, built in 1883, is not an extraordinary historical building.

It's a typical and relatively plain neoclassical (using the word colloquially) church, made of stone.

But it's still rather pretty and it's been around for a very long time. Image
It was given listed status in 1970 and concerns over its condition were raised in 2000.

In 2004 the congregation left and it bounced between proposed developers (deteriorating all the while) until 2017, when the current developer took over.

The roof was removed in 2022. Image
Read 22 tweets
Jun 18
Which would you want to live in? Image
Art Nouveau was about imbuing every single part of a building, including all its furniture and fittings, with the curves of nature.

Rather than being inspired by the past, by historical decorations, this was about finding a new and authentic source of ideas. Image
But they didn't just imitate nature; the designers of Art Nouveau adopted its general principles.

And the result is that every single thing they designed makes you feel like you've never seen it before.

A century later and even their fireplaces still look futuristic. Image
Read 13 tweets
Jun 10
Who's to blame for boring architecture? Image
Politics and architecture don't map onto one another very well; trying to understand what leads to good architecture through political "isms" doesn't really get us anywhere.

While the USSR was building a baroque metro system, the USA was building modernist skyscrapers: Image
So the architecture debate is very strange, because opposing "sides" feel obliged to defend things that don't match their other views.

Some people want more "traditional" architecture, and others defend "modern" architecture.

These are, broadly speaking, the supposed "sides". Image
Read 25 tweets
Jun 8
Taking decoration away from buildings is like creating a world where trees never have any leaves: Image
The biggest difference between how we build now and how we used to build (in terms of appearance) is that we no longer decorate anything.

There are thousands of other changes (regulations, materials, size) but this is the one that people notice. Image
And this was, partly, a conscious aesthetic choice.

If you look at the early modernists like Adolf Loos and Le Corbusier, they are very open about their belief that decoration was no longer necessary.

As Loos said, famously: Image
Read 25 tweets
Jun 3
The truth about minimalism: Image
"Minimalism" is badly misunderstood, but that's not really anybody's fault, because we're living in a time where it feels like minimalism is the dominant aesthetic.

Everything from buildings to bollards are designed the same way: simple, no details, little variety or colour. Image
And so, because they're simple, we call it "minimalism".

But minimalism was never just about keeping things simple.

The point of minimalism is using beautiful materials to make useful things (like this chair), not making things as bland and greyscale as possible. Image
Read 25 tweets
Mar 3
Friedensreich Regentag Dunkelbunt Hundertwasser is the best modern architect you've never heard of.

His philosophy was simple. As he said:

"The straight line is godless and immoral."

If there's any building you can think of, he made it look like something from a dream... Image
Accommodation at a children's hospital in Essen, Germany, from 2005: Image
A kindergarten in Frankfurt, opened in 1995: Image
Read 23 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us!

:(