My team has documented the entire Russian missile manufacturing base. That is 28 key ballistic, cruise, hypersonic and air defence missile producing plants associated with four corporations of Roscosmos, Almaz-Antey, Tactical Missiles and Rostec
The link is in the first comment
Our report How Does Russia Make Missiles? is already available for download
By the next weekend, we will be publishing the first OSINT sample, illustrating our methodology & approach. The rest of our materials will be made available laterrhodus.com
Key takeaways:
1. Missile production is mostly about machining 2. You cannot produce components of tight precision and convoluted geometry otherwise 3. Soviet missiles industry performed most of its machining manually
That was extremely laborious and skill-intensive process
4. As a result of the Soviet collapse, Soviet military industry died 5. Supply chains and knowledge ecosystems that used to support it died, too 6. That includes both the domestic machine tool industry 7. And the system of vocational training & apprenticeship
All gone, forever
8. By the year 2000, when Putin came to power, the industry was most literally laying in ashes 9. The tacit knowledge that the Soviet military production relied upon was gone, irreversibly 10. Putin was not to "modernize" the industry. He was to create it anew
11. In the 2000s, Putin brought the industry back from dead with the mass import of automated CNC equipment from Europe, especially Germany 12. That allowed to substitute the skilled manual labor Russia now lacked 13. And reboot the production of sophisticated weaponry
14. As every human decision presented a potential point of failure, Russia had to minimize the human factor in the production process 15. Thus, it became reliant upon the all-in-one, fool proof solutions allowing to largely exclude human decision making from the factory floor
16. Siemens has been the one singular company in the world capable of providing Russia with a sealed chain from the CAD to CNC controller 17. Minimizing the human factor & improving consistency 18. At the cost of low flexibility, and high dependency upon the one single supplier
19. In 2024, the Russian machining capacity relies upon the uninterrupted supply of spares & tooling from, plus software support by the U.S. allies 20. Due to the wide gap in technology, critical supplies from the West are impossible to substitute with the Chinese manufacture
Scope of our investigation
A sample of 28 key enterprises belonging to or associated with Roscosmos, Almaz Antey, Tactical Missiles and Rostec.
We will be publishing an OSINT sample illustrating our method next week. The rest will be available to the public later
This investigation would be impossible to conduct without the financial support of our donors. It started with the outrageously generous donations from our subscribers, of whom I would like to specifically mention @BErickson_BIO and @badita
@BErickson_BIO @badita It continued thanks to the Emergent Ventures grant from the @mercatus Center (George Mason University), obtained through the good graces of @tylercowen
Among our collaborators, we are especially grateful to Sean Byrnes who edited and proofread our original drafts and to Mikhail Beliansky who helped us with processing and visualising the raw data
If you want to support our work, you are more than welcome to donate:
Card payment: (on the website )
PayPal: Galeev.info@gmail.comRhodus.com
Or crypto:
ETH 0xA9FA4454cC3EC0Ff521926BB5F8D4389bA0e665a
BTC 14b3XMVwZqr7xQu5Ck7tfDSU1EG83jUptq
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Yes, and that is super duper quadruper important to understand
Koreans are poor (don't have an empire) and, therefore, must do productive work to earn their living. So, if the Americans want to learn how to do anything productive they must learn it from Koreans etc
There is this stupid idea that the ultra high level of life and consumption in the United States has something to do with their productivity. That is of course a complete sham. An average American doesn't do anything useful or important to justify (or earn!) his kingly lifestyle
The kingly lifestyle of an average American is not based on his "productivity" (what a BS, lol) but on the global empire Americans are holding currently. Part of the imperial dynamics being, all the actually useful work, all the material production is getting outsourced abroad
Reading Tess of the d'Urbervilles. Set in southwest England, somewhere in the late 1800s. And the first thing you need to know is that Tess is bilingual. He speaks a local dialect she learnt at home, and the standard English she picked at school from a London-trained teacher
So, basically, "normal" language doesn't come out of nowhere. Under the normal conditions, people on the ground speak all the incomprehensible patois, wildly different from each other
"Regular", "correct" English is the creation of state
So, basically, the state chooses a standard (usually, based on one of the dialects), cleanses it a bit, and then shoves down everyone's throats via the standardized education
Purely artificial construct, of a super mega state that really appeared only by the late 1800s
There's a subtle point here that 99,999% of Western commentariat is missing. Like, totally blind to. And that point is:
Building a huuuuuuuuuuge dam (or steel plant, or whatever) has been EVERYONE's plan of development. Like absolutely every developing country, no exceptions
Almost everyone who tried to develop did it in a USSR-ish way, via prestige projects. Build a dam. A steel plant. A huge plant. And then an even bigger one
And then you run out of money, and it all goes bust and all you have is postapocalyptic ruins for the kids to play in
If China did not go bust, in a way like almost every development project from the USSR to South Asia did, that probably means that you guys are wrong about China. Like totally wrong
What you describe is not China but the USSR, and its copies & emulations elsewhere
What I am saying is that "capitalist reforms" are a buzzword devoid of any actual meaning, and a buzzword that obfuscated rather than explains. Specifically, it is fusing radically different policies taken under the radically different circumstances (and timing!) into one - purely for ideological purposes
It can be argued, for example, that starting from the 1980s, China has undertaken massive socialist reforms, specifically in infrastructure, and in basic (mother) industries, such as steel, petrochemical and chemical and, of course, power
The primary weakness of this argument is that being true, historically speaking, it is just false in the context of American politics where the “communism” label has been so over-used (and misapplied) that it lost all of its former power:
“We want X”
“No, that is communism”
“We want communism”
Basically, when you use a label like “communism” as a deus ex machina winning you every argument, you simultaneously re-define its meaning. And when you use it to beat off every popular socio economic demand (e.g. universal healthcare), you re-define communism as a synthesis of all the popular socio economic demands
Historical communism = forced industrial development in a poor, predominantly agrarian country, funded through expropriation of the peasantry
(With the most disastrous economic and humanitarian consequences)
Many are trying to explain his success with some accidental factors such as his “personal charisma”, Cuomo's weakness etc
Still, I think there may be some fundamental factors here. A longue durée shift, and a very profound one
1. Public outrage does not work anymore
If you look at Zohran, he is calm, constructive, and rarely raises his voice. I think one thing that Mamdani - but almost no one else in the American political space is getting - is that the public is getting tired of the outrage
Outrage, anger, righteous indignation have all been the primary drivers of American politics for quite a while
For a while, this tactics worked
Indeed, when everyone around is polite, and soft (and insincere), freaking out was a smart thing to do. It could help you get noticed