My team has documented the entire Russian missile manufacturing base. That is 28 key ballistic, cruise, hypersonic and air defence missile producing plants associated with four corporations of Roscosmos, Almaz-Antey, Tactical Missiles and Rostec
The link is in the first comment
Our report How Does Russia Make Missiles? is already available for download
By the next weekend, we will be publishing the first OSINT sample, illustrating our methodology & approach. The rest of our materials will be made available laterrhodus.com
Key takeaways:
1. Missile production is mostly about machining 2. You cannot produce components of tight precision and convoluted geometry otherwise 3. Soviet missiles industry performed most of its machining manually
That was extremely laborious and skill-intensive process
4. As a result of the Soviet collapse, Soviet military industry died 5. Supply chains and knowledge ecosystems that used to support it died, too 6. That includes both the domestic machine tool industry 7. And the system of vocational training & apprenticeship
All gone, forever
8. By the year 2000, when Putin came to power, the industry was most literally laying in ashes 9. The tacit knowledge that the Soviet military production relied upon was gone, irreversibly 10. Putin was not to "modernize" the industry. He was to create it anew
11. In the 2000s, Putin brought the industry back from dead with the mass import of automated CNC equipment from Europe, especially Germany 12. That allowed to substitute the skilled manual labor Russia now lacked 13. And reboot the production of sophisticated weaponry
14. As every human decision presented a potential point of failure, Russia had to minimize the human factor in the production process 15. Thus, it became reliant upon the all-in-one, fool proof solutions allowing to largely exclude human decision making from the factory floor
16. Siemens has been the one singular company in the world capable of providing Russia with a sealed chain from the CAD to CNC controller 17. Minimizing the human factor & improving consistency 18. At the cost of low flexibility, and high dependency upon the one single supplier
19. In 2024, the Russian machining capacity relies upon the uninterrupted supply of spares & tooling from, plus software support by the U.S. allies 20. Due to the wide gap in technology, critical supplies from the West are impossible to substitute with the Chinese manufacture
Scope of our investigation
A sample of 28 key enterprises belonging to or associated with Roscosmos, Almaz Antey, Tactical Missiles and Rostec.
We will be publishing an OSINT sample illustrating our method next week. The rest will be available to the public later
This investigation would be impossible to conduct without the financial support of our donors. It started with the outrageously generous donations from our subscribers, of whom I would like to specifically mention @BErickson_BIO and @badita
@BErickson_BIO @badita It continued thanks to the Emergent Ventures grant from the @mercatus Center (George Mason University), obtained through the good graces of @tylercowen
Among our collaborators, we are especially grateful to Sean Byrnes who edited and proofread our original drafts and to Mikhail Beliansky who helped us with processing and visualising the raw data
If you want to support our work, you are more than welcome to donate:
Card payment: (on the website )
PayPal: Galeev.info@gmail.comRhodus.com
Or crypto:
ETH 0xA9FA4454cC3EC0Ff521926BB5F8D4389bA0e665a
BTC 14b3XMVwZqr7xQu5Ck7tfDSU1EG83jUptq
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
No one gets famous by accident. If Alexey @Navalny rose as the unalternative leader of Russian opposition, recognised as such both in Moscow and in DC, this indicates he had something that others lacked. Today we will discuss what it was and why it did not suffice 🧵
Let's start with the public image. What was so special about the (mature) @navalny is that his public image represented normality. And by normality I mean first and foremost the American, Hollywood normality
Look at this photo. He represents himself as American politicians do
For an American politician, it is very important to present himself as a good family man (or woman). Exceptions do only corroborate the rule. Notice how McCain defends @BarackObama
Should Putin just suddenly die, @MedvedevRussiaE is the most likely compromise candidate for the supreme political power. He is the inaugurated President for God's sake. Which means, the anointed King.
"Not a real king", "Figurehead", "Nobody takes him seriously" is just intangible verbalism. Nothing of that matters. What matters is that he is the inaugurated President, consecrated by God. Opinions are subjective, anointment is objective
It is the fact
Medvedev may be one single person in the entire Russian establishment with a decent chance to keep power, should Putin go. For this reason, he may not even need to fight for power. The power will very probably be handed to him
On Friday, @navalny died (most probably killed) in prison. This is a good time to discuss the prospects of Russian opposition and the future transition of political power, once Putin is gone. This is also a good occasion to debunk some pervasive myths on the mechanics of power🧵
First, getting rid of @navalny was probably a correct decision on behalf of Kremlin. Execution of this murder may have been suboptimal (unprofessional, etc.). But the very idea to eliminate him was reasonable and makes total sense. There is nothing crazy or irrational about it
This remark may sound as cynical or paradoxical. So let me present you another paradox, which is yet to be fully processed by the political theorists. And the paradox is:
Bloody tyrants rule longer
The Russian history may possibly demonstrate this better than any other
There is one subtle detail in Putin's narrative, that may be difficult for a foreigner to detect or grasp. There is nothing "autistic" or "obsessive" about it. There is nothing even personal.
95% of it was a standard Russian History textbook for 13-15 years old
For a Westerner, Putin's narrative may sound like a bizarre, autistic rant, signifying some deep & obsessive interest in history. For a Russian, it's not. This is just a normal history textbook for the junior high school
That is what absolutely everyone has learnt as a teen
That's why Putin feels the need to describe everything since the 9th c. and the times of Rurik in the exact chronological order. He is retelling a standard history textbook from the very beginning
By the late 20th c. Israel won. It vanquished and conquered. Emotions aside, this is exactly what happened. As the victor, Israel could choose between two workable options for what to do with its victory:
One state solution. Annex the conquered land & give citizenship to the conquered.
Pro: Claim the entire territory from the river to the sea
Contra: You will not be the Jewish state anymore. To integrate the conquered, you would need to rethink and reinvent your own identity
Two state solution. Allow the Palestinian state to form & actively assist in its formation.
Pro: You can remain a Jewish state with the Jewish majority
Contra: You will not be able to claim the entire territory from the river to the sea. You will have to return to 1967 borders
Not quite. The key thing understand about the UK is that it is a low capability & high capacity country. It produces very cool and often unique stuff. It may be even monopolist in some very important high end sectors. It is just that these sectors tend to be quantitatively small
Consider the following. The UK is an extremely important producer of the higher end measurement systems, including for the Russian military industry. It would not be too much of an exaggeration to say that the UK is a monopolist producer
But it is a monopolist in a small niche
The market of higher end measurement systems for the military/dual use industry (UK 💪) is small
The market of lower end, "dumb" powerful lasers for civilian manufacturing, shipbuilding, construction, etc (China 💪) is huge
Some market niches are just way larger than others