A Bar Kokhba era (132–135 CE) hiding complex has been found at Huqoq in Galilee.
The find adds to a growing body of evidence from northern sites relating to the Second Revolt which suggests that the rebellion extended beyond Judea, deep into Galilee.
Unlike the First Revolt (66–73/74 CE), for which we have the writings of Flavius Josephus, the textual evidence for the Second Revolt is extraordinarily limited.
2/10
For years, scholars have assumed that the Bar Kokhba revolt was geographically limited to Judea, in the south. One important reason for this is that Judea was completely destroyed with the quelling of the revolt...
3/10
...while Jewish life in Galilee survived and continued to prosper into the late 2nd century CE and beyond.
Much of the Mishnah and later rabbinic texts date to this post-revolt period.
4/10
Recent years have seen the discovery of 2nd century CE hiding complexes in Galilee, like the one reported upon here.
This suggests that Jews in Galilee were preparing for armed conflict, but it does not necessarily imply that fighting actually broke out in the north.
5/10
Very few destruction layers have been found in Galilee which date to the 2nd century.
A rare example was uncovered by Prof. Uzi Leibner in recent years, at Wadi Hamam.
6/10
To my mind, the most important evidence is the distribution of Bar Kokhba coins. These are found almost exclusively in Judea.
It is even possible to map out the Romans’ precise advance in suppressing the revolt by analyzing where dated revolt coins were unearthed.
7/10
Dated coins from the first years of the revolt are found even along the edges of Judea, while coins dated to the later years are increasingly found only within the Judean heartland.
8/10
A complete lack of Bar Kokhba coins in Jerusalem suggests that the rebels never succeeded in their goal of liberating the city from Roman occupation.
9/10
The lack of Bar Kokhba coins in Galilee similarly suggests that the Bar Kokhba administration never controlled any areas of Galilee to any meaningful degree.
Had this been the case, we would have expected some degree of circulation of revolt coins at Galilean sites.
—END—
10/10
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
It's been a year since 𝘛𝘩𝘦 𝘖𝘳𝘪𝘨𝘪𝘯𝘴 𝘰𝘧 𝘑𝘶𝘥𝘢𝘪𝘴𝘮 was published.
Post Oct. 7, I’d like to discuss a topical matter that I left out of the book: how the hypothesis of a Persian-era emergence of Judaism is deeply indebted to various strains of antisemitism.
A🧵
1/16
The book’s subtitle is: “An Archaeological-Historical Reappraisal”.
What’s “reappraised” is the long-standing scholarly hypothesis which locates the origins of Judaism in the postexilic Persian era. The idea dates to the 19th century and has since become virtually axiomatic.
2/16
“The Origins of Judaism” is a play on the title of a volume published by Eduard Meyer in 1896: “Die Entstehung des Judentums: Eine historische Untersuchung” (“The Origin of Judaism: An Historical Investigation”).
Meyer’s work represents the culmination of a century…
3/16
What are Jewish ritual immersion pools doing adjacent to the Augusteum (temple dedicated to the cult of #Augustus) at Samaria-Sebaste?
The 18-month embargo on this article is over today, so I’ve posted it here: academia.edu/62122869/The_I…
A 🧵 1/10
Excavations conducted in the first half of the 20th century at Samaria-Sebaste uncovered an Augusteum, surrounded by additional Roman-era structures. In 1992, Dan Barag published a compelling hypothesis that these buildings were a royal compound belonging to Herod himself.
2/10
ln my article, examine the function and historical significance of eight stepped pools discovered throughout this compound. I argue that these pools should be regarded as Jewish ritual immersion pools that date to the time of Herod the Great or his successors.
3/10
Can a deeply religious Christian or Jewish scholar engage in sound archaeological/historical research which relates in one way or another to the Bible?
My answer is a resolute “YES!”
So long as there is no conflict between the scholar’s beliefs and the subject of the study.
🧵1/9
Religious beliefs which relate to the nature of God, to hierarchies of values, or to how a person should act in the world need not pose any conflict of interest with archaeological and historical questions surrounding times, places and events that relate to Biblical texts.
2/9
Quite to the contrary: religious beliefs which regard the strive for truth as a religious duty and which view behaviors such as tampering with the data under study as unethical can be extraordinarily beneficial to the integrity of the scientific endeavor.
3/9
Exciting news for those interested in the fascinating phenomenon of ancient Jewish chalk vessels.
They are older than we thought.
A 🧵 1/8
Until now, we’ve thought that chalk vessels first appeared in the second half of the 1st century BCE. Around reign of Herod the Great. This was the time of the earliest, well-dated remains.
2/8
Since the phenomenon is tightly linked to ritual purity observance (see now, e.g., academia.edu/89804851/Along…) dating the first emergence of these vessels is an important part of the puzzle surrounding when Jews began to observe these laws on a widescale basis.
3/8