@joelgombiner @RARohde 1/5》I agree. Without those ice sheets, there's no source for vast influxes of freshwater into the northern North Atlantic, to slow the AMOC.
There are a few key lessons to be learned from Dansgaard-Oeschger events (and D-O #0, a/k/a the Younger Dryas). sealevel.info/learnmore.html…
@joelgombiner @RARohde 2/5》Because D-O terminations had warming trends an order of magnitude faster than current warming, and because nearly all extant species survived those large, sharp warming events, we needn't worry that the current slight warming could cause extinctions. archive.is/aUi9R#selectio…
3/5》Because D-O events only occur during glaciations, and never during interglacials, we can say with confidence that warmer climates are more stable than colder climates.
That might be largely because without the great northern ice sheets, there's nothing which could pour vast quantities of freshwater into the northern North Atlantic, slowing the AMOC.
It's surely also because Planck Feedback is ∝ T⁴, so the warmer the climate gets, the stronger that negative (stabilizing) feedback is.
@joelgombiner @RARohde 4/5》The relative stability of warmer climates is also evident in "Arctic Amplification," which is the fact that climate change disproportionately warms chilly high northern latitudes.
@joelgombiner @RARohde 5/5》Another takeaway is that, because the evidence for D-O events is conclusive, revisionist paleoclimate reconstructions by the Pages2K "hockey team," which erase D-O events to "straighten the hockey stick handle," are debunked.
3/4. The best science shows manmade climate change is modest & benign, and CO2 emissions are beneficial, not harmful. The major harms from CO2 are all hypothetical, and mostly implausible. The major benefits are proven, measured, and very large.
1/11》 Don't believe the Climate Industry propaganda. Here are some academic papers and articles about what fossil fuels, carbon emissions, and #climatechange are ACTUALLY doing to the Earth:
2/11》 Here's a NASA video about it. It's based on measurements, unlike most of the Climate Industry's "climate impact" claims, which are based on dubious modeling and baseless speculation.
3/11》 The CO2 Coalition's website also has many excellent resources to help you learn about this issue:
The CO2 Coalition is an organization of volunteer scientists, dedicated to combating disinformation about CO2 & climate change, and pushing back against the corruption of science for political & pecuniary reasons.
Many of the CO2 Coalition's members are extremely distinguished. Their newest Board Member is Dr. John Clauser, 2022 Nobel Laureate (Physics). co2coalition.org
1/11❯ You've been lied to. The impacts of rising CO2 levels are in both the past and the future, and they are overwhelmingly positive. sealevel.info/learnmore.html…
2/11❯ The fact that elevated CO2 is dramatically beneficial for crops has been settled science for more than a century. This was not the "mid 20th century." sealevel.info/ScientificAmer…
@collapse2050 3/11❯ Thanks, in significant part, to rising CO2 levels, crop yield improvements have outpaced population growth.
1/5. Here's what CO2 emissions and #ClimateChange are actually doing to the world's food supply. sealevel.info/learnmore.html…
2/5. The relationship between food (in)security and CO2 emissions / climate change is that CO2 emissions greatly improve crop yields, improve crops' drought resilience, and improve food security everywhere in the world.
2/5. It is suspiciously convenient that the largely undocumented revisions to old data so predictably support the Climate Industry's "hockey stick" narrative.
3/5. A global 0.35°C decline over roughly 30 years is a cooling trend similar in rate to the recent warming trend (depending on which temperature index you believe, of course).
Here's a 1974 newspaper article, with a nice, clear version of the 1974 plot:
The best scientific evidence, confirmed by thousands of robust studies, shows compellingly that anthropogenic warming is modest and benign, and CO2 emissions are highly beneficial, just as Arrhenius predicted, over a century ago.
2/4≫ For instance, here's a paper about what rising CO2 levels do for wheat:
Fitzgerald GJ, et al. (2016) Elevated atmospheric CO2 can dramatically increase wheat yields in semi-arid environments and buffer against heat waves. Glob Chang Biol. 22(6):2269-84. doi:10.1111/gcb.13263.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26929390
3/4≫ The most important impacts of CO2 and climate change are obviously on agriculture, and thousands of rigorous agronomy studies have quantified the large benefits. sealevel.info/learnmore.html…