“Donald Trump’s … over-the-top rhetoric is not new and, for more than 400 licensed medical professionals, it’s not the most troubling aspect of Trump’s public performances.
“They see evidence that the former president, at 77, is suffering from ‘probable dementia’ so they have signed their names … to an online statement asserting that grave concern.”
“In a long series of testimonials, doctors and other professionals cite Trump’s use of incorrect words or jumbled words, suggesting a condition known as paraphasia, a common indicator of dementia.”
“So how do [Dr. John] Gartner and the dozens of professionals he consulted discern signs of dementia?
“‘When you are literally unable to form words and what you’re saying is so incomprehensible that it’s impossible for someone to understand what you are saying, that’s not rambling,’ says Gartner. ‘Those are serious signs of dementia. If you saw them in a relative, you would run, not walk, to a specialist to get them tested and start thinking about long-term care.’”
“‘The evidence for dementia in Donald Trump has become overwhelming,’ writes Dr. Lance Dodes, a psychiatrist and retired professor of the Harvard Medical School. ‘Unlike normal aging, which is characterized by forgetting names or words, Trump repeatedly shows something very different: confusion about reality.’”
“Suzanne Lachman, a New York psychologist, posted this: ‘[Trump will] begin a sentence, and then seemingly forget how the sentence began and invent something in the middle, and then go off on a tangent that results in an incomprehensible word salad. This is behavior we observe frequently in patients who have dementia.’”
“‘If this guy presented in my office with the symptoms we observe in his public appearances, I’d refer him at once to a neurologist for a full workup,’ wrote John Biggs, a social worker and retired psychotherapist who was based at Sheppard Pratt for 30 years. ‘I wouldn’t write him an OK-to-return-to-work note, much less declare him fit to occupy the country’s highest office.’”
“The Alzheimer’s Society last month published an essay saying diagnosis at a distance is unethical and ‘usually wrong.’
“Gartner strongly disagrees. Trump and Biden are, next to Taylor Swift, the most exposed people in the country. There are ample ways to observe their behavior and hear their words every day. ‘In real medicine,’ Gartner argues, ‘thousands of psychiatrists make diagnoses every day in clinical practice based on observation of behavior, history and informant reports. Research shows all of those methods are actually more accurate and reliable than a clinical interview.’
“The greatest ethical responsibility, he says, is the duty to warn, and at a critical time for the nation.”
“The Alzheimer’s Society last month published an essay saying diagnosis at a distance is unethical and ‘usually wrong.’
“Gartner strongly disagrees. Trump and Biden are, next to Taylor Swift, the most exposed people in the country. There are ample ways to observe their behavior and hear their words every day. ‘In real medicine,’ Gartner argues, ‘thousands of psychiatrists make diagnoses every day in clinical practice based on observation of behavior, history and informant reports. Research shows all of those methods are actually more accurate and reliable than a clinical interview.’
“The greatest ethical responsibility, he says, is the duty to warn, and at a critical time for the nation.”
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
“There is ‘overwhelming’ evidence that Donald Trump is suffering from dementia, a leading psychiatrist has claimed, amid speculation about the state of the former president's mental health.”
“Dr. Lance Dodes, a supervising analyst emeritus of the Boston Psychoanalytic Society and Institute and retired Harvard Medical School professor, was among those recently quoted by Duty To Warn, which describes itself as an association of mental health professionals concerned about Trump.”
“‘Unlike normal aging, which is characterized by forgetting names or words, Trump repeatedly shows something very different: confusion about reality,’ he wrote in a statement published on Friday, which referenced Trump's confusing Barack Obama with Joe Biden.”
There’s some commentary on here saying we should disregard Trump’s “bloodbath” remarks last night because he was talking about potential harms to the auto industry.
That is misguided. 1/x
Trump may well have been referring to a “bloodbath” in that industry. He’s sufficiently incoherent that, as is so often the case with him, it’s hard to tell one way other what exactly he’s talking about at any given moment. 2/x
I’m willing to assume for the sake of argument that he was referring to cars. And it makes no difference to his malicious intent or to the danger he and his rhetoric poses. 3/x
“I'm going to do something I haven't done for the entire campaign. For those of you all who have traveled with me all across the country, I'm going to tell you what I really think of Donald Trump.”
“This man is a pathological liar. …. He lies practically every word that comes out of his mouth. And in a pattern that I think is straight out of a psychology textbook, his response is to accuse everybody else of lying.”
“Whatever he does, he accuses everyone else of doing. The man cannot tell the truth, but he combines it with being a narcissist, a narcissist at a level I don't think this country's ever seen.”
For years many people—big, strong men, with tears in their eyes—have been saying to me, sir, you should do a podcast. It would be a tremendous podcast, like no one has ever seen. (1/5)
And my reaction has always been, “Aren’t there too many podcasts in the world? How many podcasts can our small, fragile planet handle? Shouldn’t we be trying to conserve our resources for other far more important things, like Corgi TikTok videos?” (2/4)
But @SarahLongwell25 finally persuaded me. So now she and I are going to do a regular bit where she asks me questions about what’s going on with Trump in the courts and I c̶r̶a̶c̶k̶ ̶j̶o̶k̶e̶s̶ ̶a̶n̶d̶ ̶p̶l̶u̶g̶ ̶s̶t̶u̶f̶f̶ ̶I̶’̶m̶ ̶w̶r̶i̶t̶i̶n̶g̶ ̶f̶o̶r̶ ̶@̶T̶h̶e̶A̶t̶l̶a̶n̶t̶i̶c̶ explain what’s going on in serious and incomprehensible legal terms. (3/4)
“When you pick apart the many subsidiary legal issues swirling in Trump’s certiorari blender, they dissolve one by one. Take the contention that it is too difficult for courts to figure out standards by which to determine what it means to ‘engage’ in an ‘insurrection.’ The simple response to that is: ‘𝘠𝘰𝘶’𝘳𝘦 𝘬𝘪𝘥𝘥𝘪𝘯𝘨, 𝘳𝘪𝘨𝘩𝘵? 𝘠𝘰𝘶 𝘮𝘦𝘢𝘯 𝘵𝘩𝘦 𝘤𝘰𝘶𝘳𝘵𝘴 𝘤𝘢𝘯 𝘥𝘪𝘷𝘪𝘯𝘦 𝘵𝘩𝘦 𝘮𝘦𝘢𝘯𝘪𝘯𝘨 𝘰𝘧 “𝘦𝘲𝘶𝘢𝘭 𝘱𝘳𝘰𝘵𝘦𝘤𝘵𝘪𝘰𝘯 𝘰𝘧 𝘵𝘩𝘦 𝘭𝘢𝘸𝘴” 𝘶𝘯𝘥𝘦𝘳 𝘚𝘦𝘤𝘵𝘪𝘰𝘯 1 𝘰𝘧 𝘵𝘩𝘦 𝘍𝘰𝘶𝘳𝘵𝘦𝘦𝘯𝘵𝘩 𝘈𝘮𝘦𝘯𝘥𝘮𝘦𝘯𝘵 𝘣𝘶𝘵 𝘯𝘰𝘵 “𝘪𝘯𝘴𝘶𝘳𝘳𝘦𝘤𝘵𝘪𝘰𝘯” 𝘶𝘯𝘥𝘦𝘳 𝘚𝘦𝘤𝘵𝘪𝘰𝘯 3?’”
“The petition also claims that Section 3 requires Congress to enact implementing legislation under Section 5 before Section 3 can be enforced. 𝘚𝘰𝘳𝘳𝘺. 𝘛𝘩𝘢𝘵’𝘴 𝘯𝘰𝘵 𝘸𝘩𝘢𝘵 𝘵𝘩𝘦 𝘚𝘶𝘱𝘳𝘦𝘮𝘦 𝘊𝘰𝘶𝘳𝘵 𝘩𝘢𝘴 𝘩𝘦𝘭𝘥 𝘢𝘴 𝘵𝘰 𝘰𝘵𝘩𝘦𝘳 𝘱𝘳𝘰𝘷𝘪𝘴𝘪𝘰𝘯𝘴 𝘰𝘧 𝘵𝘩𝘦 𝘙𝘦𝘤𝘰𝘯𝘴𝘵𝘳𝘶𝘤𝘵𝘪𝘰𝘯 𝘢𝘮𝘦𝘯𝘥𝘮𝘦𝘯𝘵𝘴, 𝘪𝘯𝘤𝘭𝘶𝘥𝘪𝘯𝘨 𝘵𝘩𝘦 𝘌𝘲𝘶𝘢𝘭 𝘗𝘳𝘰𝘵𝘦𝘤𝘵𝘪𝘰𝘯 𝘊𝘭𝘢𝘶𝘴𝘦.”
“Director of National Intelligence John Ratcliffe expressed concern about the president’s unpredictability, noting that one minute ‘he acknowledges he lost… Then he’ll immediately backpedal.’”