We've already discussed gas power, the dying breaths of an ancient past. We've contemplated charming the wind, tapping the arteries of Poseidon and the sorcery of the reactor core.
But can we power our world directly from the Forge Of Hephaestus?
In this thread we'll go over:
-Where does the heat come from?
-Different types of geothermal cycles & drawbacks.
-The future: Enhanced Geothermal System (EGS).
-If it succeeds, where will it take off first?
The Forge Of Hephaestus is kept hot by the dying embers of supernovae: Radioactive elements in the Earth's core decay & give off heat. The core is 7000 Celsius, but up here the temperature increases, on average, 30C per km depth.
And sometimes much more...
In the heart of the old continents like Africa this gradient can be very low, but there are swathes of the world where it is 50C or even 70C/km. In zones with active volcanism 150C/km is possible!
But what is actually needed? Let's go through five current geothermal cycles.
Dry steam cycle.
For very high temperature geothermal resources only: Superheated steam evaporates on it's way to the turbine at 180C-225C and 4-8 MPa, expanding within the turbine system. It is then condensed and re-injected.
Dry steam is 27% of global capacity.
An example of dry steam is The Geysers thermal power complex in California, comprising 22 plants slowly built up over a near surface magma field from 1960. It has a generation capacity of 1,517MW, equivalent to 1 or 2 nuclear reactors.
2) Single flash steam power.
When thermal energy isn't quite sufficient for a total steam conversion, a flash chamber is used, with the remaining water recirculated. This is economically useful with a source at 150C or above. 43% of global geothermal capacity is this type.
Single flash has a compromise in the flash drum: Higher pressure means higher specific power but a lower steam flow rate.
Chemicals & gases need removing from the fluid.
Some fresh water injection is needed to replenish losses.
The Guanacaste 55MW plant is an example.
Double flash is a more complex evolution of single flash, allowing higher thermal efficiencies by using a high & low pressure flash and gaining more from a given source. Like the previous methods it can perform cogeneration: Producing a mixture of electricity & process heat.
Compare & contrast the efficiencies and operating pressures of the Guanacaste (single flash) and Beowawe (double flash) geothermal plants.
Adding a 2nd cycle: Organic Rankine Cycle (ORC).
If the primary fluid isn't hot enough for a flash, a heat exchanger allows vapour flash in a secondary lower boiling point fluid (e.g Pentane, Butane). Useful for low grade thermal sources, this is a low capacity solution.
Kalina cycle:
Another 2nd-cycle approach, using recovery heat exchangers to allow a wider range of fluids (ORC fluids can be flammable), and higher efficiency.
As with the ORC cycle, this eliminates atmospheric coolant loss and the need for replacement injection water.
The Forge Of Hephaestus is provident indeed, but it is not infinite. Geothermal plants worldwide all face the long term decline of their thermal potential.
This makes sense: If you are draining heat energy, you are disrupting a natural equilibrium and will slowly cool the rock
This is made more awkward by the relative scarcity of good geothermal sites using conventional methods, which requires a deep aquifier in porous, permeable hot rock trapped beneath a layer of impermeable rock, with a strong thermal gradient.
This combination of factors is rare enough to make geothermal energy a small niche, but what if we could *create* these environmental factors in hot, impermeable rocks, and so expand geothermal's reach hundreds of times?
This is the Enhanced Geothermal System (EGS).
Borrowing from hydraulic fracturing techniques used in oil & gas, EGS bypasses the need for trapped aquifiers and instead targets impermeable hot rocks at a 4km-5km depth to fracture a subterranean reservoir directly. This eliminates the siting bottleneck of geothermal power.
EGS also allows exciting new working fluids: Supercritical CO2 promises superior heat transmission, better flow through a complex fractured reservoir and eliminates the mineralization and corrosion challenge posed by subterranean water.
The world's first EGS project was started by the Los Alamos laboratory in the 70s, and the US & Europe investigated the technology with R&D plants for many years.
Recently, the number of EGS demonstration projects has started to take off....
It's no surprise: Deep drilling at affordable cost, hydraulic fracturing & well diagnostics came of age in the US fracking boom in the last 2 decades, driving down costs, and this represents most of the capital outlay of an EGS system.
The Department Of Energy has estimated that EGS could have the potential to power 65 million homes in America, at maybe 45 USD/ MWh.
But that's easier said than done: A host of EGS pilot projects have been run, and many were failures.
Why?
An EGS project needs to drill multiple wells, then hydraulically fracture a network of cracks that intersect & give an even spread of flow paths in the new reservoir.
Rock often fractures unpredictably along natural lines, short-circuiting or failing to join the network.
There is good news though: Late last year a Google sponsored startup, Fervo Energy, exported EGS energy into the Nevada grid using an ORC cycle plant. High electricity prices, combined with fracking knowledge & the IRA subsidies, could trigger a boom.
If the boom occurs I'm betting on the USA: With abundant hot rock deposits, fracking experience, investment capital and EGS research over the years it is in a prime position.
America birthing yet another energy boom may grate on some people, but it could have company: A rich thermal seam runs straight through Europe as well.
But if we are to charm the gods of the underworld, we will need to stop using Fracking as a dirty word.
So here's to yet another possible future, in which a civilization of wonders is powered, unseen & unheard, by the forge of continents.
Articles used are attached, all free downloads. I hope you enjoyed this!
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
It's the greatest story never told: It's the story of how a frugal county in the North of England invented the modern world.
Put on a flat cap and call up the whippet, because this is a thread about my home county, and the inventions that came out of Yorkshire!
Steel!
Benjamin Huntsman invented high homogeneity crucible steel in Sheffield in the 1740s, firing with coke to fully melt the steel and homogenise the carbon content.
This became used… everywhere, and supercharged the ongoing industrial revolution.
Steam trains.
Steam locomotion had been in development for some decades by 1812, but arguably the world's first commercially successful steam locomotive was Matthew Murray's Salamanca. To him, we owe speed.
A liquid rocket boost stage needs to pump fuel and cryogenic oxidiser to the combustion chamber at a rate that beggars belief: The 33 engines on the boost stage of SpaceX's monstrous ‘Superheavy’ booster each chew through about 700 kg of propellant every second. Put all those engines together and the flow rate of liquid fuel & oxygen would be sufficient to empty an Olympic swimming pool in under 2 minutes, if you could find an Olympic swimming pool for cryogenic propellant.
Can you think of any conventional lightweight pump that can do this? Me neither. You need something special…
The turbopump comprises a typically-axial turbine powered by hot, pressurised gas flow that powers centrifugal compressor pumps that pump the colossal quantities of propellant required and pressurize it to, potentially, hundreds of standard atmospheres.
It's a handy, lightweight way to provide pumping power, but it does require that you have a source of hot, high-pressure gas to work with.
Now, where would you find that in a rocket engine?
Indeed. In order to burn fuel, we must pump it. In order to pump it, we may have to burn some of it.
Um…
The Gas Generator Cycle.
A small quantity of the pressurised fuel & oxidiser flows are tapped, brought to a small combustor, vaporised, ignited then expanded through a turbine that powers the fuel and oxygen compressor cycles.
Inevitably the gas generator can't run with a completely nominal fuel:oxy mix, as it would get so hot that it would melt the turbine blades, so typically a gas generator will trade off some efficiency and run fuel rich to power the turbopumps.
-Why not oxy rich? Because fuel has a higher specific heat at constant pressure (Cp) and so you need less mass flow through the gas generator if it's fuel rich than oxy rich, meaning more useful propellant goes to the main combustor & nozzle that moves the rocket.
So the upside of a gas generator cycle is relative simplicity and robustness, which is why it's used on the most reliable rocket motors around, the SpaceX Merlin. The downside is that you trade away efficiency by throwing away some of your propellant, meaning that the tyranny of the Tsiolkowsky rocket equation will kick you where the sun don't shine.
Staged combustion attempts to address this, by taking either a fuel rich or oxy rich preburner, operating at a much higher flow volume than a standard gas generator, and routing the hot gases that leave the turbine straight to the combustion chamber so that they're not lost. This not only increases the average propellant exhaust velocity (since none of it is lost) and therefore efficiency, but also allows a lower average temperature in the preburner and turbine, since there's a higher volume throughput instead.
On the flipside you must deal with hugely increased engineering complexity, an increased potential for feedback control problems between the different parts of the engine, and also a much higher pressure preburner, since it will still need to deliver high working pressures to the combustion chamber after the losses of the turbine and injectors.
The Soviets got there first, and some of their genius manifested in the Russian RD180 oxy-rich staged combustion engine, which was bought by the Americans and used in Atlas rockets for many years. Its unique oxy-rich staged combustion cycle was efficient but not without drawbacks, as high temperature gaseous oxygen is brutal to exposed metal surfaces, demanding an enamel coating on many parts of the engine.
Last month Rolls-Royce won the UK's small modular reactor competition to develop and build SMRs in the UK. It could be a new dawn for nuclear power.
But who else was in the competition, what was special about each design, and which is your favourite?
An SMR thread…
What's an SMR?
A small modular reactor is a way of beating the brutally high capital costs of building nuclear power: By simplifying assembly (modularity) and minimising subsystem size so almost all of it is factory built you harvest industrial learner effects and low costs.
Boiling water vs pressurised water reactors.
All designs in this list are either PWRs or BWRs, the most common reactor styles today. I've a thread on the basics if you need it, but otherwise on with the show!
In April on a mountain in Chile the Vera Rubin observatory gathered first light, and this telescope will be world-changing! -Not because it can see the furthest… but because it can see the fastest!
The Vera Rubin telescope thread! The value of speed, and unique technology…
Who was Vera Rubin?
She first hypothesized the existence of dark matter, by observing that the rotation speed of the edge of the galaxy did not drop off with radius from the centre as much as it should. The search for dark matter, and other things, will drive this telescope…
Does it see a long way?
Yes, but it’s not optimized for that: The battle of the big mirrors is won by the Extremely Large Telescope which, yes, is meant to see a long way. Vera Rubin is not that big, but that doesn’t matter because it has a different and maybe better mission.
Rotating detonation engines: Riding the shockwave!
A technology that could revolutionise aviation, powering engines with endlessly rotating supersonic shockwaves. It could bring us hypersonic flight, super high efficiency and more.
The detonation engine thread…
Almost all jet engines use deflagration based combustion, not detonation, but while fuel efficiency has been improving for decades, we're well into the phase of decreasing returns and need some game-changing technologies.
One is the rotating detonation engine (RDE).
To understand the appeal of RDEs, you need to know that there are two forms of combustion cycle: Constant pressure, where volume expands with temperature, and constant volume, where pressure goes up instead.
Most jet engines use constant pressure. RDEs use constant volume.
As a new graduate I once had to sit down and draft an engine test program for a subsystem of a new model of Rolls-Royce aero engine. It was illuminating.
So here's a thread on some of the weirder things that this can involve: The jet engine testing thread!
Fan Blade Off!
Easily the most impressive test: A jet engine needs to be able to contain a loose fan blade. In the FBO test, either a full engine or a fan & casing rig in low vacuum is run to full speed, then a blade is pyrotechnically released.
Frozen.
The Manitoba GLACIER site in Northern Canada is home to Rolls-Royce's extreme temperature engine test beds. Not only must these machines be able to start in temperatures where oil turns to syrup, but in-flight ice management is crucial to safe flying.