Leslie Kajomovitz Profile picture
Mar 24 7 tweets 8 min read Read on X
Dissecting Gaza's Casualty Figures: Debunking Media Myths with Gaza (Hamas) Ministry of Health's Report

The latest report from the Gaza Ministry of Health, for March 19, 2024, has provided crucial insights that debunk widespread misinformation regarding the casualty figures in the recent conflict. Contrary to sensationalized media reports claiming 30,000 deaths, the official report confirms 17,571 confirmed deaths, a significant difference that sheds light on the exaggeration of figures.

What makes this report particularly important is that it includes confirmed deaths that also account for individuals missing or trapped under the rubble. This further discredits claims of thousands more unaccounted for and emphasizes the accuracy and transparency of the Ministry of Health's data.

Additionally, comparing this report with data from The Shirin Observatory, known for its meticulous record-keeping of each victim, reveals intriguing details. Out of the 17,571 confirmed dead, only 3% are children under 9 years old, totaling around 150. This translates to less than one child per day since October 7, challenging narratives of widespread child casualties.

Moreover, the age distribution of the deceased is telling, with ages between 18 and 40 accounting for 70% of the dead. This suggests that the majority of casualties are fighters rather than civilians, contrary to claims portraying a high number of civilian deaths.

Another myth dispelled by the report is the notion that 70% of the victims are women and children. In reality, the gender split among confirmed deaths is 44% female and 56% male, highlighting the need for accurate reporting and careful examination of data before drawing conclusions.

It's worth noting that while the Ministry of Health's report provides solid evidence, the United Nations (UN) and certain media outlets have need to be criticized for creating false narratives based on zero evidence. The same reports they quote actually confirm the numbers presented by the Ministry of Health, highlighting a failure in basic journalism and fact-checking.

The Gaza (Hamas) Ministry of Health's detailed report not only provides clarity on casualty figures but also underscores the importance of fact-checking, responsible journalism, and questioning narratives that lack substantial evidence.
Unraveling the 30,000 Myth: Gaza (Hamas) Ministry of Health Confirms 17,571 Dead

Recent reports from the Gaza (Hamas) Ministry of Health have brought clarity to the casualty figures in the recent conflict, revealing that the actual number of confirmed dead is 17,571 out of which 150 are children under 9. This stark contrast to the false narrative of 30,000 casualties circulating in media reports underscores the importance of accurate and verified information in conflict reporting.

The Ministry of Health's report directly challenges exaggerated claims and sensationalized figures, highlighting the discrepancy between factual data and speculative reporting. It's crucial to note that while the report acknowledges "media reports" of casualties to make the math to 30,000 work, there is a notable absence of specific records or identification of individuals in these reports.

It includes confirmed deaths that also account for individuals missing or trapped under the rubble. This further discredits claims of thousands more unaccounted for.

This discrepancy raises questions about the reliability and credibility of the so-called Gaza media reporting, especially when it comes to casualty figures. Without concrete evidence or verifiable data, the inflated numbers presented in media reports lack substantiation and contribute to misinformation and sensationalism.

The Ministry of Health's focus on confirmed deaths, totaling 17,571, provides a clear and reliable picture of the human cost of the conflict. This factual information is essential for understanding the true impact of the conflict and avoiding the spread of false narratives that can distort public perception and fuel unnecessary panic or outrage.

In conclusion, the confirmation of 17,571 dead by the Gaza Ministry of Health serves as a crucial reminder of the importance of relying on verified data and avoiding sensationalized reporting that can mislead and misinform the public.Image
Debunking the 70% Women and Children Myth: With Gaza Ministry of Health Reveals Gender and Age Breakdown

Amidst the the recent conflict, there have been widespread media reports suggesting that 70% of the casualties are women and children. However, a closer look at the data provided by the Gaza (Hamas) Ministry of Health and The Shirin Observatory it paints a different picture, debunking this myth and providing clarity on the gender and age breakdown of casualties.

According to the Hamas Ministry of Health's report, the gender split among confirmed deaths is 44% female and 56% male. This stark contrast to the reported 70% figure highlights the inaccuracies and misrepresentations in some media reports. The actual gender distribution underscores the need for accurate reporting and fact-checking to avoid perpetuating false narratives.

Furthermore, the age breakdown of casualties from The Shirin Observatory reveals important insights. Children under the age of 18 account for 19% of the total deaths while children under 9 are only 3%, (150 total), challenging claims of a disproportionate number of child casualties. Among the underage victims, male casualties make up 60% of the reported dead, further emphasizing the need for nuanced and accurate reporting that takes into account all demographic factors.

This gender and age breakdown provided by the Gaza Ministry of Health serves as a valuable tool for understanding the true impact of the conflict and dispelling misconceptions propagated by sensationalized media reports. It highlights the importance of relying on verified data and conducting thorough analysis before making sweeping statements about casualty figures.

The discrepancies between media reports and official data also raise concerns about the spread of propaganda and misinformation. Both the media and international organizations like the United Nations (UN) must prioritize accuracy and transparency in their reporting to ensure that the public receives reliable information.

It is imperative that they refrain from spreading unfounded claims and instead focus on presenting verified facts to the public. In conclusion, the Ministry of Health's revelations regarding the gender and age distribution of casualties debunk the 70% women and children myth, emphasizing the importance of responsible reporting and factual accuracy in conflict coverage.Image
Debunking the Myth of 13,000 Children Dead: Gaza (Hamas) Ministry of Health Confirms Real Numbers

In recent discussions surrounding the conflict, there have been alarming claims that 13,000 children have died. However, a careful examination of the confirmed reports from the Gaza (Hamas) Ministry of Health reveals a different reality, debunking this myth and shedding light on the actual numbers of child casualties.

According to the data when also crosschecked with The Shirin Observatory, 150 children under the age of 9 have tragically lost their lives. Additionally, approximately 4,900 children between the ages of 10 and 17 are among the confirmed dead. These figures, while heartbreaking, starkly contrast the exaggerated claim of 13,000 child deaths.

Furthermore, the age breakdown shows that children under 18 account for 19% of the total deaths, with 3% being children under 9 and the rest between 10 and 17. This debunks the notion that half of the deceased are children, as reports inaccurately suggested. The accurate statistics provide a more nuanced understanding of the demographic impact of the conflict.

It's crucial for the media to rely on verified data and factual information to avoid spreading misinformation and contributing to the sensationalization of casualty figures. By debunking myths like the claim of 13,000 children dead, the media can foster a more informed dialogue and promote responsible reporting.

In conclusion, the confirmed numbers from the Gaza (Hamas) Ministry of Health regarding child casualties debunk the exaggerated claims and emphasize the importance of accuracy and transparency in conflict reporting, urging the UN to cease spreading propaganda and the media to uphold journalistic integrity.Image
Unveiling Gaza's Casualty Demographics: Insights into the Age Distribution of the Deceased

Amidst discussions about the casualties in Gaza, a crucial aspect often overlooked is the age distribution of the deceased. Recent reports from the Gaza Ministry of Health reveal that 70% of the confirmed dead fall within the age range of 18 to 40. This statistic sheds light on the high possibility that a significant proportion of these individuals are fighters.

The age distribution data challenges narratives that portray the majority of casualties as civilians, particularly women and children. While every loss of life is tragic, understanding the demographics of the deceased is essential for a comprehensive analysis of the conflict's impact.

The predominance of casualties among individuals aged 18 to 40 suggests a heavy presence of combatants or individuals actively engaged in conflict-related activities. This underscores the complexity of the situation and emphasizes the need for nuanced reporting that considers all aspects of the conflict's human toll.

By highlighting the age distribution of casualties, we aim to encourage a more informed discussion about the realities on the ground in Gaza. It's crucial to recognize the diverse demographics of those affected by the conflict and avoid oversimplifications that may distort the true nature of the situation.

In conclusion, the data on age distribution among Gaza casualties points towards a high possibility that a significant portion are fighters, highlighting the multifaceted nature of the conflict and the importance of accurate and comprehensive reporting.Image
Conclusions

❌Debunking the myth of 30,000 dead: Recent data from the Gaza Ministry of Health confirms 17,571 casualties, challenging exaggerated claims.

❌Disproving the 70% women and children narrative: Gender split among casualties shows 44% female, 56% male, contradicting reports of a 70% female casualty rate.

❌Clarifying the 13,000 children claim: Children under 18 account for 19% of total deaths, with 3% under 9 years old and the rest between 10-17, debunking exaggerated child casualty figures.

❌Notable age distribution: 70% of confirmed dead aged 18-40, indicating a significant presence of fighters among the casualties.Image
Sources:
Ministry of Health Report


The Shirin Observatory
vizrt.expert/nextcloud/inde…
shireen.ps/martyrs/year/2…

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Leslie Kajomovitz

Leslie Kajomovitz Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @lkajomovitz

Mar 24
🧵Hippocratic Oath Betrayed; Healthcare of Terror

The focus of this thread is not on the evidence from the recent conflict but on how deeply rooted the issue is within the entire healthcare system. The intertwining of healthcare and terrorism in Gaza and the West Bank is a deeply concerning issue that raises serious ethical and moral questions.

The involvement of doctors, who are entrusted with saving lives, in terrorist activities and leadership roles within extremist organizations like Hamas, casts a dark shadow over the healthcare system in these areas. The betrayal of the Hippocratic Oath by healthcare professionals who engage in terrorism is a stark reminder of the ethical breaches occurring within these institutions.

The international community and organizations like the UN cannot claim ignorance about the misuse of healthcare facilities for terrorist purposes. It is imperative for them to acknowledge and address these issues, ensuring that medical institutions uphold ethical standards, prioritize patient welfare above political agendas, and remain neutral entities dedicated to saving lives without discrimination or violence.

The naming of hospitals and healthcare institutions after individuals linked to terrorism, such as Hamas co-founder Dr. Abdul Aziz Al-Rantisi, who was not only Head of pediatrics at Naseer Hospital but later was memorialized with the Rantisi Children Hospital in Gaza after his death in an Israeli strike, sends a troubling message. It blurs the lines between humanitarian work and extremist ideologies, potentially undermining the impartiality and integrity of medical institutions, while all these institutions are funded with international taxpayers' money.

The targeted assassinations of senior Hamas leaders like Dr. Omar Saleh Farwaneh, who was not only a doctor but also a prominent figure in Hamas leadership, further highlight the troubling situation. The involvement of healthcare professionals in violent acts, such as the murder of an Israeli citizen allegedly carried out by doctors and a nurse in the West Bank, adds to the gravity of the issue.

Dr. Ghassan Abu-Sittah's, a famous doctor during this conflict and public appearances have made him Gaza’s hero doctor, but his affiliations with terrorist figures, as seen in his eulogy for PLFP founder Maher Al-Yamani, underscore the challenges of separating medical ethics from political extremism in these regions, while also highlighting how the media has been using controversial figures with links to terrorism to speak about the conflict on the ground raising great ethical questions for transparency and accuracy in journalism, blurring the lines between informing the viewers and propaganda.

The financing of hospitals and healthcare facilities in Gaza and the West Bank by donor nations, with significant involvement from the United Nations (UN), adds another layer of complexity to the ethical and moral challenges faced in these regions. Donor nations contribute substantial funds to support medical infrastructure, equipment, and personnel, often channeling these resources through UN agencies and humanitarian organizations.

However, the extent of UN involvement goes beyond mere financial support, as it plays a crucial role in coordinating healthcare operations, ensuring access to medical supplies, and overseeing the delivery of healthcare services to the population. This deep involvement underscores the international community's responsibility in addressing ethical dilemmas within healthcare systems filled with terrorism, emphasizing the need for transparency, accountability..
Dr. Abdul Aziz Al-Rantisi: A Legacy of Controversy and Memorialization

Dr. Abdul Aziz Al-Rantisi, a prominent figure in Palestinian politics and a co-founder of Hamas, remains a controversial figure whose legacy is intertwined with both healthcare and terrorism in Gaza. His life and actions raise ethical questions about the intersection of humanitarian work and extremist ideologies, particularly in the context of international funding for healthcare institutions.

One of the notable aspects of Dr. Al-Rantisi's legacy is the memorialization of his name with a children's hospital in Gaza. This memorial raises questions about his involvement in healthcare in Gaza and the ethics of naming healthcare facilities after individuals with ties to terrorism. It also brings attention to the issue of international donors financing hospitals named after individuals associated with extremist organizations like Hamas.

Nasser Hospital, where Dr. Al-Rantisi served as Head of Pediatrics, is funded by various international organizations, including the United Nations Relief and Works Agency for Palestine Refugees in the Near East (UNRWA), the World Health Organization (WHO), the United Nations Children's Fund (UNICEF), the International Committee of the Red Cross (ICRC), Médecins Sans Frontières (Doctors Without Borders), European Union (EU) humanitarian aid programs, and the United States Agency for International Development (USAID).

Dr. Al-Rantisi's involvement in Hamas and his militant activities raise ethical and moral questions about the memorialization of individuals associated with terrorism and the role of international donors in funding healthcare institutions named after such individuals.

Born in 1947 in Yibna, Palestine, Dr. Al-Rantisi pursued higher education in the field of medicine. He graduated from the UNRWA alumni year in 1965 and later obtained a Master's degree in pediatrics from Alexandria University in 1972. He began his medical career at Nasser Hospital and was a member of the administrative body of the Islamic Academy, the Arab Medical Society in the Gaza Strip, and the Palestinian Red Crescent. Additionally, he worked as a lecturer at the Islamic University of Gaza, teaching courses in science, genetics, and parasitology since its opening in 1978.

However, Dr. Al-Rantisi's involvement in terror activities drew attention and controversy. He co-founded the Islamic Resistance Movement (Hamas) in 1987. He was deported to southern Lebanon in 1992, where he emerged as an official spokesman for the deportees. After returning to Gaza, he was arrested and imprisoned by Israeli authorities until 1997.

Dr. Al-Rantisi survived an assassination attempt in 2003 but was assassinated on April 17, 2004, in Gaza City when an Israeli helicopter fired a missile at his car. The memorialization of Dr. Al-Rantisi's name with a hospital and his involvement in militant activities highlight the complexities and controversies surrounding healthcare and terrorism in the region. It raises questions about accountability, transparency, and the ethical responsibilities of international donors in funding healthcare institutions in conflict zones.
Dr. Omar Saleh Farwaneh: The Interplay of Healthcare and Terrorism in Gaza

Dr. Omar Saleh Farwaneh's life exemplifies the intricate connection between healthcare and terrorism, particularly in Gaza. As a prominent healthcare professional and a figure associated with Hamas, Dr. Farwaneh's story sheds light on the complex interplay between healthcare services and radical ideologies.

Dr. Farwaneh, had great involvement with Hamas, a militant group in the region, adds a layer of controversy to his medical career. While respected for his medical skills, his affiliations with terrorism raise questions about the ethical boundaries of healthcare professionals engaging in terrorist activities and associations with extremist organizations.

Dr. Farwaneh's son-in-law serves as the spokesman for the Qasam Brigades in Gaza, highlighting the family's deep ties to militant activities. Additionally, Dr. Farwaneh was expelled with Dr. Abdul Aziz Al-Rantisi, Hamas co-founder to Lebanon in 1992, further emphasizing his connections to Hamas leadership.

Dr. Farwaneh's father was a poet, and he recently narrated one of his father's poems that resonated with Hamas ideology: “For we are on your chests and in your graves You will leave our country from Hebron to the Negev”

Despite these controversial affiliations, Dr. Farwaneh continued his work in healthcare, balancing his medical duties with his involvement in Hamas. His assassination during the current conflict in Gaza, was described by Human Rights Watch as a precise strike.

Following Dr. Farwaneh's death, the media portrayed it as a crime against doctors and condemned Israel, ignoring his affiliations to terrorism and the clear circumstances of his death that were confirmed to be a very targeted strike. This selective portrayal highlights the challenges of navigating media narratives and political agendas in hiding the involvement of healthcare professionals with ties to extremist groups.

The abuse of healthcare facilities by terrorist organizations is a pressing issue that cannot be ignored. These facilities, meant to provide medical care to civilians, are sometimes used as bases for terrorist operations or propaganda. Such misuse not only compromises the integrity of healthcare but also endangers the lives of patients and healthcare workers while the United Nations fails in condemning these practices outright.
Read 8 tweets
Feb 12
🧵How Much is a dead Jew worth? 🔻💵🧐🤢🤮

In average a dead Jew is worth $1,000,000 (ONE MILLION DOLLARS). We dive deeper into what it actually means, and how does it work. Follow this thread to learn about the "pay-to-slay" policy from the Palestinian Authority
Read 18 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us!

:(