Got put down an interesting Diddy rabbit hole by a friend who worked for Warner Music once upon a time.
Apparently Diddy's dad worked for Frank Lucas, running heroin into the US during vietnam. Familiar with the movie American Gangster? That's Frank Lucas.
Interestingly enough, Diddy was awfully close to the Bronfmans, the wealthy family that owns Seagrams and got its start bootlegging from Canada during the prohibition. Back then, Edgar Bronfman Sr. was the CEO.
How close to the family was he? Well, he hung out with Edgar Jr quite a bit.. Apparently Jeffrey Epstein got his start
And it shouldn't be surprising that Combs, who was essentially the Jeffrey Epstein of the music world, would be so joined at the hip as the made man of the same family as the sisters who ran the NXIVM sex cult, which engaged in trafficking, Sara and Clare Bronfman.
Epstein and the Bronfmans had all the same friends as well. With massive investment in legal human trafficking (immigration) and illegal human trafficking (prostitution). It's good to see the rumors that have been floating around about Diddy finally hit the mainstream.
He was also pals with Naomi Campbell, a known Epstein collaborator according to Virginia Giuffre in her testimony against him.
This video has a good explanation of extra fine details I won't repeat here, as he sums them up pretty well.
There's nothing particularly organic about Sean Combs position. His dad was part of a highly organized crime syndicate with adjacent links to the CIA via the French Connection to the heroine trade. He was born into his profession and uplifted further by wealthy crime families.
And in unraveling the current state of the world in my research, it feels like everything keeps coming back to two families. The Pritzkers, who created Obama from cradle to grave, and the Bronfmans. Two chicago mob families of massive influence.
And in turn, Obama studied under weather underground founder Bill Ayers in Chicago, who introduced him to Penny Pritzker at a house party. Penny would go on to become his commerce secretary, and currently she rules Harvard with an iron grip as its senior fellow to push DEI.
The Pritzkers are a real rogues gallery of assholes, but that's probably a story for another thread. Particularly the only "trans billionaire", "Jennifer" Pritzker.
A friend once told me that every taboo being normalized starts as a billionaires fetish and/or blackmail.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
I'm at waffle house with my family and there's a trad Muslim family of Pakistani extraction here.
They are putting nice white boy zoomer worker through the ringer about "cleaning the grill so no bacon grease is present"
I'm passive aggressively queueing up Creed on the jukebox. The staff are jamming out to With Arms Wide Open rn.
I used my song credits up and it was quiet, guy started playing some kind of ethnic stuff on his phone. Bought some more touchtunes credits and it's with arms wide open time now
Feel like the John III Sobieski of waffle house rn
I think perhaps Elons issue with the Visa thing is that O1 Visas are very restrictive and effectively limited to established, older, already credentialed and famous people.
So if I try to cut through all the noise on both sides of this issue, it sounds like we need a drastic reduction in granted H1B visas overall, coupled with a drastically more strict definition of what kind of jobs qualify for an H1B application.
We're seeing everything from cooks to helpdesk IT guys to online moderators for Cognizant on these H1B registries. These are not skilled jobs, these are not hard to hire Americans for, and serve only as the cheap imported labor that everyone on the right is *justifiably* complaining about and wanting to stop.
However, on some level, it *is* fundamentally useful to import talent. The problem is the system that is designed to do that is being fundamentally exploited and needs an overhaul. It's doing more harm than good in its current state.
We probably do have a STEM gap on some level that does need to be addressed, primarily because universities have become extremely hostile to the most prominent and productive demographic, young men. The universities need to be beaten and tamed ASAP, because as it stands right now the best universities, law schools, and medical schools, are handing out enrollments to people who don't deserve them and who can't perform because of DEI, and each of those people is effectively occupying a chair that belongs to someone who can.
I think the most realistic and achieveable compromise on this would be a reduction in overall H1B visas (and other programs), while tightening the criteria for even being able to apply for them. In-demand specialist fields only, and the Government and the private sector needs to do a better job of defining what fields are actually in-demand.
I think getting rid of nation caps is also a bad idea, India would dominate the visa process due to sheer numbers, and candidates from smaller nations would be lost in the shuffle.
That being said, the other half of the problem isn't the program. And it isn't "contemptibly racist" or whatever to admit that a ton of these firms and HR departments are effectively Indian Recruiting Firms.
They're the guys calling me on my phone or emailing me or messaging me on LinkedIn asking if I want to apply for a job in a completely different discipline of tech 5 states away, just so they can say they "tried" to get Americans for the job but failed, and need an H1B visa.
None of the tech bros will ever address that last part because they're afraid they'll be labeled racist for admitting its true. The ethnocentric and very tribal nature of a lot of Indians is responsible for a lot of the hatred towards the Visa program.
And let's all be honest here, while techbros are being incentivized to support the mass importation of Indians, the reason the State Department allows this is because they want to forge nepotistic ties back to India.
They want those ties in order to backchannel influence into India so they can use their surplus population as a meat grinder on Chinas western flank.
The reason we aren't granting these visas to Europeans on the regular is because NATO would have a shit fit.
Nowhere in the calculus of the elites does the welfare of the founding stock population ever become a priority, all that they and the elites of other nations care about is The Great Game.
How many of these Indian CEO's in America are already related to wealthy Indian families in India? A ton of them. It's like giving away an ambassadorship in exchange for influence.
While to their credit, many have legitimately humble beginnings and you can argue that successful parents have successful kids, successful *families* have important networks. And whether they realize it or not, influence channels in both directions. Channeling many of the young elite of India into American institutions forms a reciprocal concern between the two nations over the long term. The type that can generate backdoor political support in either nation.
So at the foreign policy level, the support for mass immigration from India at the white collar level is support for tying us at the hip geopolitically. Something that many an economist would defend as a smart decision, given the size of their emerging consumer market. But not so much if you're an American citizen trying to get a white collar job.
One thing I notice on the mainstream conservative circuit, especially in the more outwardly religious circles, is the mouthpieces spend way too much time talking *at* men in videos like this.
This content isn't for men, it's meant to be consumed by women scrolling Tiktok or Reels so they can feel validated/self-righteous with the side effect of giving a critical eye to their marriage so they can find a reason to be mad at their husbands when they otherwise wouldn't be.
The reason I know this is because my wife sees this kind of content constantly. She'll doomscroll facebook reels from time to time and because in their ad profiles she's tagged as Christian, Female, Republican, she'd be exactly the person to see content like this.
So if your wife is religious and consumes algo slop videos, just keep in mind she's gonna see a constant queue of videos where some divorced gen X pastor on TRT talks about men and porn addictions and "treating women right" which feels almost purpose built to attack foidbrains
There is that underlying subversive "vibe" that shows a certain degree of intent from the writers in the trailer. They show you.
Ciri being a witcher is a disregard for canon in the name of having a female protagonist. But the plot of the trailer itself gives it away, it's meant to send a retarded message of "women are to be sacrificed by men" in a perversion of the old folk tale of the princess being sacrificed to the dragon, and the fact that when Ciri kills the monster she comes back to find the villagers killed the girl anyway because by damn they're gonna sacrifice that woman whether it makes sense or not, shows that somewhere in CD Projekt is a wine aunt or hateful uggo troon who is making key story decisions.
Speaking exclusively to IGN ahead of the reveal, executive producer Małgorzata Mitręga said Ciri was “the very organic, logical choice.”