Alaric The Barbarian Profile picture
Mar 27, 2024 7 tweets 3 min read Read on X
A lot of people believe in a sort of magical X factor in fighting — some call it grit, heart, spirit, etc.

I believe in it too. I just don’t believe it’s magical.

It can be broken down and systematized, just like strength training and technique. 🧵 Image
Most of this is mental, which means that the only way to really put in quality reps looks a lot like “woo” nonsense.

But it’s not — and, critically, the only way for training to work is for the trainee to fully buy into it. Image
Warrior rituals across historic civilizations were basically ways of unlocking that “X factor.”

And those sorts of rituals are reflected today, among many fighters.

Mike Tyson was hypnotized. McGregor meditated and visualized the fight. Prochazka does… this.
There are a lot of different aspects to what that “X factor” actually is, but usually it’s a flow state.

Perfect focus; meditation while moving. Time slows down and actions seem to happen via pure will.

That’s an actual thing you can train yourself to access and do. Image
Besides that, it’s physical.

“Tendon strength” is a real thing; so is muscle memory. And you can only get there via repetition.

That repetition also feeds into the mental side of things. It’s why having training routines and rituals is so important. Image
In fact, a lot of modern sports psychology is just finding ways to re-arrive at historical rituals and knowledge via scientific materialism.

Half the time it’s just reverse-engineering Germanic berserking or elements of samurai Zen Buddhism.
We’ve pretty much come to a consensus with various pre-scientific societies on how to prepare somebody to go into hand-to-hand combat:

Brief removal from society, meditation, visualization, repetition, ritual.

Personally I think that’s insane

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Alaric The Barbarian

Alaric The Barbarian Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @0xAlaric

Dec 15
This is the most important article of the year. Highlights below, but you should really read it in full. Image
The article traces the systematic exclusion of young white men from media and high-status careers. This is from the end, but it’s one of the boldest elements: we ruined basically everything, just to spite white men. That’s the only driving ethos. Image
The piece starts off with a brief history of DEI.

2014 was *the* pivot, America’s Cultural Revolution against “white guys.” It was a defined historical moment, not just some cultural miasma that grew over time.

(My article on the subject below) Image
Read 13 tweets
Nov 3
“Behold, a man!”

The endpoint of social media is to reduce the user to his central nervous system alone — the physical body made vestigial, skipped entirely in favor of machine-legible reflexes. You already have Neuralink; we all do.

1/ Image
It does not take long to see that online behavior is autonomic, libidinal. Engagement — likes, replies, reposts, DMs — is more often reflex than “thought.”

The same reply 150 times is schooling behavior, is just as biologically-ingrained as in fish. It skips the frontal lobe. Image
Image
The brainstem-level autonomic reflex to Content is inseparable from the desire to shape The Audience by one’s response. Engagement is not “honest” but instrumental, meant entirely to “control the discourse” with one’s contribution, knowing that it’s public. Image
Read 9 tweets
Oct 21
Aella is a really odd figure. She’s clearly not just dumb, which is what many people say; and her thinking is just close enough to the “dissident sphere” so as to make people feel like she’s engaging with it.

Outside of people falling for bait, “so close, yet so far” is a common reaction. She does accurately diagnose a lot of things about sexuality and lust, and the odd forms of self-consciousness around it today. Female desire inherently involves being objectified, male desire is in many cases performative or competitive for its own sake, popular sexual morality is pretty bizarre and contradictory, the culture lies that women don’t enjoy sex, etc.

But as close as she can get, there is an unbridgeable gap. She extrapolates strange morals from those observations, weird and off-base personal norms. Alien desires.

As far as I can tell, Aella was raised as some flavor of ultra-fundie, and as a result she experienced “sexual liberation” in a direct and unselfconscious sense. She Actually Went Through It. Now she hosts rationalist orgies as a way to extend that revolution — a continual exercise of the same process — the process of ritually disabusing oneself of “traditional sexual morals” — of seeking more “philosophically true” or “essential” pleasure.

But this is *not* the popular experience of “sexual liberation.” Most of the people on here were born far after the Sexual Revolution proper, and experienced it as a continuous mass-cultural ritual. Young women, for example, are expected to ritually experience and reject traditional sexual morality, to act in a stage-play of the Endless ‘70s that includes both the shame of “traditional morality” and the activist anti-eroticism of the new. Young men are beaten into neuroticism about their sexuality, a similarly-staged process *in which the “traditional view” is a key player even long after its death* and desire is used only as a social-political signal.

So even though many people share language and concepts with Aella, and she even touches on some wrongthink truths about sexuality, there’s this unbridgeable gap.

Aella exists unknowingly as a tulpa of the sexual-cultural ritual “unbinding” that she Actually Underwent, but her audience only pantomimed; she is pure Process; she is a human representation of the bizarre stage-play that is modern sexual-moral instruction. That people alternately treat her as a weird pet or a demon only demonstrates this. She is the Noble Savage of the Sexual Liberation Cinematic Universe made manifest, and I don’t think she realizes it because no one in her audience (or her critics) has identified the process they’re both participating in, surrounded by even, as they engage with it.
Whenever anyone engages with Aella, positively or negatively, they are participating in the same mass-cultural ritual that produced Aella, she is a memetic construct manifested by the fact that “sex discourse” is the actual goal of popular sexual morality
Social media is sort of an infinite Aella-spawner; she might dematerialize without the specific discourse environment that supports her existence, which includes the inevitable “she’s a stupid whore” replies to this, as if my post is a defense of her

“Aella doesn’t exist theory”
Read 4 tweets
Oct 16
Women will post this captioned “me and who???” and then go on the Tea app to ruin a guy’s life for being a little too pushy at a bar. They are a fundamentally unserious species and our customs should reflect this
Extrapolate this to traditions, laws, social customs
Writing customs around the reality of female lust would lead to strange and foreign experiments in human organization; this will be the Great Work of any truly ambitious group that wants to affect change in the modern world
Read 4 tweets
Oct 9
AI is a bubble because tech is a bubble, in turn because data is a bubble, in turn because institutional investment is a bubble, in turn because US macro policy has been deranged for ~15 years

Emergency wordcel thread

1/
AI in itself is the most overleveraged industry in recent history; capex is in the trillions and revenue in the low billions. Every major AI company is operating at a vast loss, which is justified by media histrionics about AGI bringing the apocalypse.
Actual product adoption is strongest at the consumer level, the segment which can only operate at a loss. Enterprise integration experiments are failing, & it’s evident that most of them were just a way for executives and PMs to advance their careers rather than produce value
Read 12 tweets
Jan 11
The “work” debate is mostly people talking past each other, but it’s very clear that old-type “bootstrap” discourse is just done. Sandblasted into nothing each time it encounters reality. The “deal” for young people only gets worse with each passing day.
Doesn’t mean you should just become a NEET, obviously. But I don’t think most of the people arguing on that side are NEETs, or want to be NEETs. It’s just the premise.
The solution for young people is to exploit any advantage they personally have; to seek marginal living/employment situations that break the “rules” in their favor.

Also high-powered careers — “normal life” is broken, so you have to aspire to something else while it’s repaired.
Read 5 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us!

:(