Bullshitters are people who 'claim knowledge or expertise in area where they actually have little experience or skills.'
Boys are excellent bullshitters, and teachers need to know this.
Allow me to explain...
In this study👇from 2019, researchers used PISA data to assess the extent to which students bullshit.
A 2012 PISA test from asked 15yos to rate their knowledge of 16 mathematical concepts. For example, 'Exponential function', 'Divisor' & 'Vector'docs.iza.org/dp12282.pdf
3 of these 16 mathematical terms were in fact made up: 'Proper number', Subjunctive scaling' and 'Declarative fraction.'
Boys were far more likely than girls to say they knew these made up concepts well, or that they understood them, or, in other words, more likely to bullshit.
Interestingly for teachers, bullshitters are also far more likely to have higher confidence levels in their ability to solve problems in comparison to non-bullshitters, even when they are of 'equal academic ability'.
What does this mean for teachers?
1. Always check for actual understanding.
Test the SAME knowledge using DIFFERENT questions and contexts.
2. Avoid competitive elements in the classroom.
The social pressure boys often feel to be good at EVERYTHING means they could say things they don't really mean like, 'Yes, I understand.' Use low stakes quizzing and remove peer marking to reduce risk of public exposure
3. Create a classroom culture of failure
Repeatedly live modelling and making mistakes and edits in front of the class can help instil the idea that the finished product doesn't happen at the click of a space bar but as part of a process of trial and error.
@threadreaderapp unroll please
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
🧵 Big news today: Netflix drama Adolescence will be shown in all UK secondary schools to help tackle the influence of toxic online figures like Andrew Tate. As a teacher—and someone who’s worked closely with teenage boys—I’ve got thoughts. A thread 👇 🧵
The show follows a 13-year-old boy accused of stabbing a classmate. It explores misogyny, online radicalisation, and the influence of male figures like Tate. It’s bold, and it’s necessary. But it also raises some serious concerns.
My first concern: using Adolescence in schools risks villainising boys who are already vulnerable. If a student sees himself in the main character—lost, angry, looking for belonging—then watching that character be framed as dangerous could push him further away, not bring him in.
🧵 Ofsted Inspections and Sexual Harassment: a thread for people working in schools 🧵
Sexual harassment is very much on Ofsted's agenda. Here's what you need to know.
Say what you like about Ofsted, but tackling the scourge child-on-child sexual harassment (SH) is something they really care about. Increasingly, a teachers are getting in touch to tell me that during inspection, children were asked about sexual harassment by Ofsted inspectors.
Inspectors are asking questions like:
-Does SH happen here?
- What have you learned about SH and how to deal with it?
- Do you know who to go to should incidences of SH occur?
I asked current Ofsted inspector directly , last night, what sort of questions could be asked. 👇
🧵 FRAGILE MASCULINITY, SEXISM AND HOMOPHOBIA: A THREAD FOR PARENTS AND TEACHERS 🧵
It's never easy to hear rank sexism or homophobia, particularly if it's from boys or men we care about.
I've just read an interesting study into this and I want to tell you about it...
So in 2017, researchers gave 166 straight blokes, a survey with questions about their own masculinity, how important their masculinity was and any anti-gay attitudes they might have or not have.
Then it gets interesting...
All participants were told that the survey measured the extent of their masculinity or femininity.
Half of the fellas were not told the outcome of their survey. (Control group).
The other half were told that their responses were classed as feminine. Masculinity threatened!
I've taught a lot of boys a lot of writing over the years. Here's a few tips to get boys writing, better.
1. THE DOT
Research has shown that those things that are conducive to academic success- hard work, perseverance, organisation - are seen by students as inherently female traits, and as such, the reverse is true for boys.
This - along with the idea that English is a ‘girly subject’ - could explain why many boys struggle to get going when it comes to writing.
As Mark Roberts explains in Boys Don’t Try, ‘the dot’ can be a useful tool in holding boys to account.
🧵 'LOOKSMAXXING': A guide for teachers and parents. 🧵
Warning: a bit gory
Let me tell you about Looksmaxxing: the toxic trend telling lads that in order to look good, they need to smash the bones in their face. Yep. Smash the bones in their face.
The term LooksMaxxing, refers to the process of maximising one’s physical attractiveness in order to be more sexually appealing to women. The phrase has direct links to incel culture and the manosphere and is a popular TikTok trend among teenagers.
Most teenage boys I speak to are aware of Looksmaxxing and the various techniques that can be employed to improve their 'SMV' - Sexual Market Value