I saw another right-wing cheap-shot artist describe Illinois Gov. J.B. Pritzker as a child of privilege. That would be true if money was the only thing that mattered. But Pritzker lost both of his parents by the age of 17. A thread. 1/7
J.B. Pritzker’s father died of a heart attack at age 39, when J.B. was 7. His mother was an alcoholic, and J.B. would check on her at night because she drank and smoked in bed and he was afraid she’d set the sheets on fire. 2/7 chicago.suntimes.com/2022/5/13/2306…
J. B. Pritzker’s fears about his mother were well-founded. She did indeed have a fatal accident related to alcohol. Apparently drunk, she jumped from the cab of a tow truck and was run over. Her son J.B. was 17 at the time. 3/7 upi.com/amp/Archives/1…
There are different kinds of privilege. Having both your parents alive and healthy when you’re a child is one. J.B. Pritzker didn’t have that. His childhood ordeal gave him empathy toward others who were suffering. It has made him a better governor. 4/7
I’m not a longtime Pritzker guy. When I was metro editor at the Chicago Tribune, we published negative stories about him. He’s a politician, and it was our job to ask hard questions. But I have to say that Pritzker has performed beyond my expectations as governor. 5/7
It’s OK to disagree with Pritzker, but he’s a hard worker whose conduct on Covid was exemplary. So it rankles me when a bitter, twisted fascist like Trib ex-columnist John Kass ridicules Pritzker’s weight and calls him a “rich kid born on 3rd base thinking he hit a triple.” 6/7
Right-wingers like Kass have a strange attitude about rich people. They like them when they’re Donald Trump, or when they’re billionaires bribing Supreme Court justices. They hate them when they use their money to support policies that benefit the less fortunate. 7/7
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Why did it take independent journalist Jonathan M. Katz rather than a news org with the resources of WaPo, NYT or Politico to break the story about Sen. Katie Britt’s dishonest State of the Union rebuttal? rawstory.com/katie-britt-ou…
And when will those big news outlets pick up the story? Will they ignore it because they’re embarrassed? Will they sneak it into the 14th paragraph of a story 3 days from now?
NYT has now posted a story with 2 versions of a crappy headline. First they said Britt’s story “wasn’t fully accurate.” Then they said it “was misleading.”
Just say she falsely blamed Biden’s current border policies for sex trafficking that occurred outside the U.S. 20 years ago.
This “beleaguered” headline is bullshit. It’s an example of how the New York Times routinely undercuts the hard work of public policy in favor of MAGA fascist showmanship. The New York Times is intent on entertaining us to death. 1/2
The “beleaguered” New York Times headline is just the kind of thing I wrote about this week when I asked: Does the New York Times care if democracy survives? Read my newsletter and consider subscribing (for free). 2/2 stopthepresses.news/p/is-the-new-y…
OK, I was planning to do just 2 tweets about this, but I’m infuriated at the framing and want to say more. Biden is trying to help students — especially low-income students — get out from under crushing debt. And the New York Times casts it in cynical, negative terms. Outrageous.
In this time of obliviousness and denial about the rise of fascism in America, I looked in newspaper archives for how early Nazi Germany was viewed in the U.S. The Bergen (NJ) Record reported in 1933 on a respected educator assuring folks that there was no cause for worry. 🧵 1/5
Carl Marsden, former New Jersey principal, said “the Nazi movement is a conscientious endeavor on the part of the German people to put its house in order. … Hitler and his followers may mellow, as Mussolini and the Fascists have.” 2/5
The impulse to assume extremists don’t mean what they say is perilous, and potentially fatal. The New York Times should be haunted by its first-ever reference to Hitler in which it said his “anti-Semitism was not so violent or genuine as it sounded." 3/5 vox.com/2015/2/11/8016…
A more accurate headline would be “Republicans Hold Ukraine Aid Hostage to Exploit Border Issue Against Biden.”
But instead the New York Times spins it just the way the Republicans want.
The only reason Ukraine aid is even tied to the immigration issue is Republicans. There's no rational link— it's just a Republican political tactic. But in the 33 words of NYT's headline and supporting text, Republicans aren't even mentioned.
One of the worst aspects of political coverage in recent decades is Republicans framing an issue to their advantage and the mainstream media instantly buying into and supporting that frame.
Nikki Haley is trying to pull off a trick: Make right-wing white people comfortable in their racism and denial of history so they won't see her as one of the brown people whom they hate. It's not working.
If you're 52 or older, the Tuskegee syphilis experiment happened during your lifetime. That's when doctors diagnosed Black patients with syphilis but didn’t tell them and let the disease progress so they could study its effects. It didn’t end until 1972.
Tonight is Americans' first chance to vote for Trump since he tried to overthrow our democracy and stated publicly that he wants to be a dictator. And it certainly appears that Iowans will vote for fascism tonight. 🧵 1/4
How could this happen? How could a state that is the sixth-whitest in the union but voted for a Black man for president just a dozen years ago throw in with a candidate who represents our nation’s worst racial and religious bigotry? 2/4
How could Iowans who consider themselves good Christians vote for a man who has committed serious crimes, including an attempted coup and the theft of state secrets? How could Iowans be so stupid to think a man who has made a career of lying isn’t lying to them? 3/4