Japan wasn't colonized in any meaningful sense by "Western" powers at any point in its history. European merchants were present in Japan during the period depicted and they even owned some land, but they were very much subject to the will of local daimyo and later the shogun. 1/
Eventually the Portuguese were expelled and only the Dutch were allowed to trade in Japan, and their movement was very limited. Now then, Japan did have to deal with American, British, French, and Dutch gunboat diplomacy in the 19th century, but Japan still wasn't colonized. 2/
And due to the Meiji restoration and rapid modernization, Japan was able to escape the worst parts of "Western" imperialism and became an imperial power in its own right. Which went... uh... not great for anyone involved to put it mildly. 3/
Speaking of which, the Meiji restoration and relations with the "West" before the restoration are a very interesting topic. I'd recommend checking out Joshua Provan's (@LandOfHistory) "Wild East" for more info on Japanese relations with the British. 4/
Contributed by @luke_d_ismas and @Dauntlesssix6
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
There were not sixty to ninety thousand black Confederate soldiers. There were black militiamen in the 1st Louisiana Native Guard, but the unit was quickly disbanded and saw close to no action. A small black unit was being formed in Viriginia in 1865 but didn't see action. 1/6
For the vast majority of the war, black people could not serve as Confederate soldiers. Only utter desperation changed that in 1865, and, even then, it was only on a limited basis.
Black people could be found in Confederate armies throughout the war, however. As slaves. 2/6
Now then, the op is partially correct. US war aims during the Slaveholders' Rebellion did not involve emancipation. Initially. That changed as the war progressed.
However, the whole point of "secession," and thus southern war aims, was the preservation of slavery. 3/6
So this isn't true. Medieval Europeans did bathe and wash themselves fairly regularly. Was it as frequent as it is for modern people? No. There wasn't the infrastructure for that. But, there were a lot of public bathouses, and we have many depictions of Europeans bathing. 1/3
The "Moors" of Al-Andalus were generally quite advanced in many respects, and living in Al-Andalus would probably have been more pleasant than living in most Christian parts of Spain at times, but that is a large generalization of several centuries in a very dynamic region. 2/3
Anyways, you don't need to denigrate other civilizations to make the "Moors" come across as advanced. They are plenty interesting enough on their own without massive exaggerations.
A short article on European bathing habits:
3/3daily.jstor.org/scrub-a-dub-in…
I don't think "everyone" dreams of fighting in a "last stand." That's a very weird thing to dream about.
As one may expect, this thread has some... interesting examples. 1/10
First off, the Franks weren't facing constant assaults on their positions for 7 days, which is what this makes it sound like. There were several days of skirmishing, but the battle itself happened on one day.
Second, Tours didn't ensure a Christian Europe. 2/10
That's not how history works, and the Umayyad campaign that year was already close to ending. Their objective probably wasn't the wholesale conquest of France, but our sources are inconsistent. And the Umayyads invaded again a few years later with some success. 3/10
Yes, Yasuke was a real person. He's a really interesting historical figure, and I'd suggest looking into him if you've never heard of him. Black people were very rare in Sengoku period Japan, but there's no reason Yasuke can't be a protagonist in an Assassin's Creed game. 1/4
Assassin's Creed has so, so many actual issues if you care about historical accuracy. It is absolutely wild that some people are making a big deal about being able to play as an actual historical figure while claiming to care about historical accuracy and immersion. 2/4
*SPOILERS FOR AC ODYSSEY AHEAD* Will they portray him 100% accurately? Ofc not. It's an Assassin's Creed game. They portrayed Aspasia as an evil mastermind that controlled the entire Greek world. That's worse and less accurate than almost anything they could do with Yasuke. 3/4
The only one of those that was remotely close to a counteroffensive against Western imperialism was the invasion of Czechoslovakia, but that's being insanely generous and asserting that anti-Soviet self-determination is automatically Western imperialism. 1/4
Calling the 1939 invasion of Poland (which was fighting the Nazis) a counteroffensive against Western imperialism is... a choice. Tbf, they could be talking about the 1919-1921 Polish-Soviet War, but I'm pretty confident that wasn't what @ConspiracyBull1 was talking about. 2/4
If we're talking about the 1919-21 war, Poland was not great. They shouldn't have invaded Ukraine. But the Soviets weren't fighting to defend Ukraine. They were fighting to absorb Ukraine and, later, Poland. The invasion of Afghanistan was more out of concern about Islamism. 3/4
I can't believe I'm coming to the defense of Alex Jones, but yes, Hitler was responsible for millions of deaths (even ignoring all of the atrocities). Hitler started the war by invading Poland. France and the UK followed their treaty obligations. Germany wasn't a victim. 1/4
France and the UK should be criticized for not coming to the defense of Czechoslovakia in 38 and not doing more to aid the Poles once the war started. They should not be criticized for finally standing up to Nazi aggression. Peace with the Nazis was no longer an option. 2/4
Yes, atrocities were committed against German civilians. Which was bad. That doesn't suddenly mean that the Nazis were the good guys.
Also, Rudolf Hess was not tortured, and he wasn't even there on the orders of Hitler. Hitler's actual peace offers were unacceptable. 3/4