Jacob Bard-Rosenberg Profile picture
Mar 30 12 tweets 3 min read Read on X
THREAD: What is happening in UK universities is astonishing. Right now about quarter of universities are laying off staff. Almost all universities expect to make a loss this year. And the entire thing is happening in an effort to deceive the population about migration statistics.
It's true that migration to the UK is high right now. We have a government with a headline policy of reducing immigration. But the only way they have found to do it is to try to discourage international students from taking up places in UK universities. Why this makes no sense:
Foreign students are a straightforward benefit to the UK economy. Each international student brings in tens of thousands of pounds. Broadly, these people are consumers not just of education, but also of all sorts of other goods and services. More specifically, you can imagine
education as an export. We have a good education system with great infrastructure. People from around the world pay us more for education than it costs us to provide. It is something we are good at, and which people from other countries want to buy. We have a superb higher
ducation workforce. In fact we have a whole lot more people wanting to work in the sector than can get jobs. It is a sector of the economy that could easily be expanded, and such expansion would be economically beneficial to the UK. You would think that this is precisely the sort
of thing a rational government might invest in. Instead, we are seeing huge cuts that will lose lots of the best, most talented, most committed, and most experienced faculty. Those who can will likely take jobs abroad. Others will just leave the sector. Even within the sector,
international students subsidise both the education of domestic students and research undertaken by academics. Basically everyone agrees that international students are an economic benefit. However, we go back to the immigration statistics. Since the government can't control
immigration in any other way, they have the idea that it can be reduced by putting in international student numbers year on year.

Last year, they announced that international students can't get visas for dependents. Let's imagine a scenario this applies to. A 30 year old
professional with a great first degree wants to get a masters degree from UCL in London. They offer her a place but she has a five year old child. She can't take up the offer because the child will not be able to get a visa. Does this sound sensible? Who gains from this? The
easy answer is: the UK's competitors in the global higher education market. But then, it looks good on the government immigration stats. So it will be this way.

The current statistics suggest international enrolments have dropped by 44% this year. This is why there are lay offs
everywhere. The government will say it makes economic sense. But really it is just a stupid, damaging game aimed to lie to the population. Yes, it will look like immigration has gone down. But then there will be economic damage not only to the higher education sector but also
to all the local economies near universities that benefit hugely from international student spending. There will be damage to domestic student education as staffing is reduced. And there will be the loss of a highly experienced workforce.

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Jacob Bard-Rosenberg

Jacob Bard-Rosenberg Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @Prolapsarian

Nov 14, 2023
Completely appalled by Jürgen Habermas’s statement on the war in Gaza (). The belief that supporting whatever the Israeli regime and army do will protect Germany from its past is itself antisemitic. Saying that the mass slaughter of Palestinians and the 1/normativeorders.net/2023/grundsatz…
Destruction of Gaza is “justified in principle” is bad enough. But to claim to do so “in solidarity with … Jews” is horrific. It silences the voices of Jews who have dissented from this terrible violence. It attempts to make them morally culpable. Meanwhile, not a thought is 2/
Offered to Palestinian victims of the invasion. Or rather one thought is offered with a sentence that begins, “Despite all the concern for the fate of the Palestinian population, however…”. And this is from the German academy’s apparently foremost thinker of ethics. Such 3/
Read 9 tweets
Oct 29, 2023
We, the people of the world, stand accused of extremism, because we believe in the rights of Palestinians to determine their own lives, free from fear and violence, in a land they can call their own. Our leaders, who accuse us, believe in the bombing of a captive population. 1/5
A population where half of the people are children. It is difficult to imagine a situation more extreme, more dehumanising, more awful than what Israel, supported by the leaders of the world, are imposing on Gaza. Against this we are surely moderates, who struggle for peace, 2/5
dignity, and freedom. We, the people of the world, are accused of supporting terrorists because we believe that Palestinians ought to be able to defend themselves from violence. Meanwhile, it is Israel that rules over another land with endless bombs and rows of tanks. It is 3/5
Read 5 tweets
Apr 29, 2023
It is such a shame that the deep public criticism of OFSTED is happening only after its terrible work is completed. Most of the British public do not understand what it was for and what it was doing. The timeline of Ofsted is that of the privatisation of most of Britain's schools
under the academies programme. Schools used to be run and owned by the state, and with teachers all on a fixed national payscale. The role of Ofsted over the last 25 years has been, one by one, to accuse schools of failing in order to offer
cover for selling them off to private providers as academies, in which teachers are removed from the national payscale, in an effort to undermine national collective bargaining over pay. Meanwhile these schools are magically able to pay huge amounts at the executive level. So
Read 6 tweets
Nov 7, 2022
THREAD: It is frankly astounding how much love this idiotic thread is. This "explainer" on antisemitism manages to suggest that Jews in the first half of the 20th century were wealthy and that "European Jews did benefit from whiteness, which is why they were given Palestine". Ok,
let's talk about what's right and what's wrong here. Firstly there is no "one" antisemitism. The story that the author gives explains a particular strand of thought that is a mainstay of quite a lot of antisemitism, in which Jews are modelled as secret controllers of the world
however there's also plenty of other antisemitic myths that have nothing much to do with this: for example, Jews are trying to foment revolutions; or Jews eat the blood of Christian children; or Jews are mean; or you shouldn't do business with Jews because they will take
Read 19 tweets
Mar 9, 2022
A thread on this misconception. Let's start with two reasons this question comes up in the first place: firstly, there is a tendency in recent(ish) criticism to understand Adorno as a mere critic of ideology. This is particularly present in the American academy, where he is most
often taught as a sort of grumbler who simply laments the excrescences of modernity, diagnosing cultural phenomena as deceptive in one way or another. Secondly, Adorno's own criticism of Heidegger is oddly pitched - especially in the late work (Jargon of Authenticity and the
first half of Negative Dialectics.) So in this thread I'm going to do three things: outline the nature of Adorno's objections to Heidegger, in order to set them against each other as firmly as possible; give some indications of how these differences and objections can be read
Read 48 tweets
Jan 28, 2022
THREAD: Wow the antisemitism in the Labour Party these days is wild. So a Jewish member of Haringey Labour Party, whose parents and grandparents fled Nazi Germany, and whose other relatives were murdered in Auschwitz and Bergen Belsen, was due to give a presentation about Jewish
resistance in Poland for Holocaust Memorial Day. Before the meeting she gets phoned up by her non-Jewish MP @CatherineWest1 and asked not to speak. Then at the meeting she is attacked again and a third of the meeting walk out. The attempts to silence Jews talking about a genocide
That directly affected their own family is pretty much the definition of antisemitism. Why did this happen? Because the woman who was speaking had called Israel an apartheid state on Twitter. So now you’re only the right sort of Jew to speak about persecution of Jews, about
Read 6 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us!

:(