How Nehru and Indira gifted away India's strategic parts to its Neighbours 🧵
An RTI query exposed one more dark chapter of Nehruviaqn dynasts when it came to public knowledge that Late Smt Indira Gandhi Gifted Katchatheevu island of Tamilnadu to Shri Lanka!!
Since 1947 Nehru and his dynasty ruled India like its personal fiefdom.
Today we will see, how this family literally gifted away India to its Neighbours for own whims and fancies leading to present strategic crisis on India's land and maritime borders.
1. Kabaw Valley, Manipur
In 1953, Nehru visited Northeast and gifted 11000 square kilometer area of Kabaw valley in Manipur to Burma as a gesture of friendship!!
Now this valley is home to insurgent groups funded and supported by China to spread unrest in Northeast India.
2. Coco Islands
In 1947, after some informal meetings with Lord Mountbatten, the then viceroy of India, Jawaharlal Nehru, considered this area nothing but a barren land and gave it away to the Britishers who leased it out to the Burmese. And since 1994, it has been revealed in several media reports that the Myanmar government has leased out the Island to the Chinese who have purportedly made it a center to spy on DRD’s missile programs.
3. Katchatheevu Island
It was gifted to Shri Lanka by then Prime minister of India Late Smt Indira Gandhi IN 1974.
Katchatheevu is an uninhabited off-shore island in the Palk Strait. It was shaped due to volcanic eruptions in the 14th century.
The administration of the 285-acre land was made by India and Sri Lanka during British rule.
The island is situated between Rameswaram (India) and Sri Lanka. The usage of Island was traditionally done by both Sri Lankan and Indian fishermen.
Under the “Indo-Sri Lankan Maritime agreement” the Katchatheevu Island has been accepted by Sri Lankan territory.
There were for very long time both countries’ fishermen have been fishing in each other’s waters without conflict.
The issue came out with signing of four Maritime Boundary Agreements during 1974-1976 by both countries.
The agreement marked the international maritime boundary of India and Sri Lanka.
The problem turned serious after the next few decades went well. The problem popped out when fish and aquatic life in the Indian continental shelf depleted and this depleted condition resulted in an increased number of Indian fishermen in the region.
Now the real problem came up IN 2021 when Sri Lanka govt. sold three islands next to Katchatheevu in Pak strait, Delft, Analativu and Nainativu to CHINA FOR SETTING UP POWER PLANST!!!
4. Andaman Nicobar Islands
Most contentious part of 1947 geography demarcation between India and Pakistan were Andeman and Nicobar Islands.
Britain wanted to keep them with itself for its Navy's transit stop for further trade routes to Australia and pacific territories, while Pakistan wanted them as a transit route stop to East Pakistan. Nehru had almost given up these Islands to Britain, had it not been for the intervention of Sardar Patel.
5. Lakshadweep islands
Just like Andaman Nicobar islands, Britain wanted to keep them with itself for its Navy's transit stop for further trade routes to Australia and pacific territories, while Pakistan wanted them as a transit route stop to East Pakistan. Nehru had almost given up these Islands to Britain, had it not been for the intervention of Sardar Patel who sent an Indian Navy frigate to be anchored their as he had sensed Jinnah's special interest in these muslim population dominated islands!!
6. Aksai Chin
Much has been written about how Nehru let go Aksai Chin in 1962 to Chinese invading army.
A year before the Sino-Indian war on December 5, 1961 during the debate on Aksai Chin in Rajya Sabha, Prime Minister Jawaharlal Nehru had made that famous statement in Parliament of “not a blade of grass grows there”. This was at a time when China was invading, infiltrating and occupying Ladakh (Aksai Chin). It invoked immediate sharp rejoinder from Mahavir Tyagi who pointed to his bald head and wanted to know whether he too should treat it as useless?
One line in English of Nehruivian logic costed India 38000 Sq Kms of its own land!!
7. Kashmir
More we say anything on Kashmir less it is!!
You can simply understand it from the fact that Nehru entrusted responsibility of all the princely states in India to merge with India, with Sardar Patel but he kept Kashmir issue with himself!!
Reason for this exception was Nehru's personal equation with then Maharaja of Kashmir, Hari Singh.
On May 10 1946, the National Conference under the leadership of Sheikh Mohammad Abdullah, launched the ‘Quit Kashmir’ movement.
In his speech on 17 May, 1946, Sheikh Abdullah said, ‘The tyranny of the Dogras has lacerated our souls. It is time for action. You must fight and enter the field of ‘Jihad’ as soldiers. Every man, woman and child will shout ‘Quit Kashmir’. The Kashmiri nation has expressed its will. I ask for a plebiscite on this question.
On May 20, he was arrested. The other prominent leaders of the National Conference were also detained.
Ironically, Nehru went all out to defend Sheikh Abdullah who was calling for a ‘jihad’ against Hindu Dogras.
He not only demanded immediate release of Sheikh Abdullah but himself proceeded to Kashmir to make arrangements for Sheikh’s defence.
Maharaja Hari Singh prohibited Nehru’s entry into the state as this would have further added fuel to the fire that would have threatened the existence of Hindus in the state. Nehru defied the order and he was arrested.
Nehru was furious for his arrest and he took it as a personal insult to him.
This was the reason Nehru delayed accession of Kashmir to India as he had a personal score to settle with Maharaja Hari Singh!!
Even after accession of Kashmir to India, Nehru was not satisfied with hoisting his buddy Sheikh Abdullah as political king of the Kashmir.
When Pakistan staked claim to Kashmir and attacked it in 1947, Nehru took Kashmir issue to the United Nations, thus creating a permanent geopolitical dispute with Pakistan which Pakistan manipulates till date.
8. The legacy of a name and its misuse
Even within India, In nationa capital region of Delhi Nehru Gandhi dynasty created landmarks, buildings, institutuitons with personal name ascribed to them at the expense of the tax payor money for self glorified monuments.
9. The Last journey of land occupation
Just look at the below map and guess for yourself, how a family went all out to stamp its power footprints on govt land with full pomp and show!!
The union government has spent more than Rs 20 crore in the last five years on the maintenance of VIP samadhis in the national capital including Shanti Van and Shakti Sthal, and the samadhis of Jawahar Lal Nehru and Indira Gandhi respectively.
The civil wing of the Central Public Works Department (CPWD) gave this information in response to an RTI application filed by Dev Ashish Bhattacharya. The figure will escalate when adding the amount spent by the electrical and horticulture wing of the CPWD, which is information that the applicant is yet to receive. The figure Rs 20 crore does not include the amount spent on Rajghat, the memorial of Mahatma Gandhi as it is maintained by Gandhi Smriti.
10. The disease of Pseudo Secular Family gifted as secularism to the Bharat
Just look at the below family map and change in surnames down the line!!
This is what they painted as secularism and destroyed social fabric of sanatan Bharat.
And it started with Nehru much much before that 42 nd amendment of the constituiton of the India!!
11. This is the family who still wants to rule Bharat and keep fleecing Bharat for gaining riches to fill their own pockets.
We have a chance to shut them down forever in 2024 upcoming Loksabha elections.
Your one right vote can cure Bharat from this perenial Nehruvian dynasty disease!!
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Netflix - The perfect model of Consumer Psychology with a dark History 🧵
Have you ever observed when the term "Binge watching" came up in our daily lives? 🔥🔥
Have you ever paid attention to the content you watch online and how it has started shaping your relationships choices, interpersonal interactions and even the way you eat and dress? 🔥🔥
That is what consumer psychology does to you and you follow it unconsciously!!
Welcome to the dark world of the online content.
Let's explore how Netflix shaped the mental and social psychology of a complete generation of the humanity: ▶️
1. The beginning
Netflix was launched on January 16, 2007, nearly a decade after Netflix, Inc. began its pioneering DVD‑by‑mail movie rental service, Netflix is the most-subscribed video on demand streaming media service, with 260.28 million paid memberships in more than 190 countries as of January 2024.
It was founded by:
a. Marc Randolph, co-founder of Netflix and the first CEO of the company
b. Reed Hastings, co-founder and Executive Chairman
Netflix and its employees have become more openly left-leaning and politically active since the 2016 election cycle. In 2020, Netflix was the most Democratic-leaning major tech company in the United States by political donations. The company has made controversial decisions regarding both its in-house and licensed content which indicate a commitment to political correctness.
In 2018, Netflix signed a deal with the newly founded Higher Ground Productions, the production house formed by former President Barack Obama and First Lady Michelle Obama.
In the 2020 election cycle, Netflix employees gave over $10.7 million with over 99% of individual contributions going to Democrats. According to a CNBC report, Netflix was the most Democratic-leaning major tech company in the United States. The largest recipients were the Senate Majority PAC, the Movement Voter PAC, and the Future Forward PAC. Democratic presidential candidate Joe Biden received $467,502, compared to $1,815 to then-President Donald Trump.
Netflix co-founder and CEO Reed Hastings has made hundreds of donations totaling hundreds of thousands of dollars to political candidates and organizations, with the vast majority of funds going to Democrats.
Co-CEO Ted Sarandos has made 18 political donations exclusively to Democrats, including Barack Obama, Hillary Clinton, and Joe Biden. He has made three donations to the DNC Services Corp totaling almost $100,000.
In next part of the thread we will explore, how family genealogy of the Netflix co-founder Marc Randolph along with Globalist stakeholders shaped Netflix content and its use as a consumer psychology tool to drive leftists' agendas.
2. The shareholders
A look at the top stakeholders of the Netflix clearly shows why it has become left liberal content peddling machine.
Globalist money spinners Vanguard, Blackrock, State Street are all there in the list.
The Truth of The Sikhs in Pakistan
#farmerprotests2024 🧵
Now that so called Farmers have openly demanded Khalistan and merger of their Khalistan with their beloved Pakistan, Lets apprise them of some stark truths about Sikhs and how they are treated in Pakistan.
Pic 1 - Map proposed by General Zia Ul Haq With Lahore as capital
Pic 2 - Map proposed by CIA Proxy Sikh For Justice and its 2 Paise leader Gurpatwant Singh Pannu with Amritsar as capital
Pic 3 - Khalistan map found with one of the aides of Amritpal Singh along with Khalistan flag and Khalistan currency
()
1. Kartarpur (Sahib) is the filth of Sikhs. We will not tolerate this in Pakistan"
- Pakistan's most popular Sufi saint - Khadim Rizvi
What is the reason why Khalistan's advocates do not say a single word on these Sufis of Pakistan, who actually massacred the Sikhs.
2. Sikh Gurudwara attacked in Pakistan, Holy scripture Shri Guru Granth Sahib Ji desecrated.
1. Delhi court rejects bail plea of Sharjeel Imam in sedition, UAPA case for anti-India and anti-CAA speeches
2. I want to ask the Gujarat government that Maulana is arrested for reciting the Poetry but there are many such videos in Gujarat in which they talk about shooting me but no one even touched them...Why like this..?
- Assasudin Owaisi
3. Islamist 'Shane Ali Turk' threatens Hindus and asks them to stay away from Mosques.
First you martyred our Babri Masjid now you are looking at our other Mosques. Do not force us to take up the sword otherwise we will change the date of this era.
Javed Siddiqui is arrested for Haldwani Riots, he is the Brother of Samajwadi party leader Matin Siddiqui.
Two masterminds of the Haldwani Riots have been identified. The names of two Samajwadi Party leaders have also emerged in this case. The Dhami Government plans to impose the NSA on all of them.
#HaldwaniRiots
1. All illegal madrasa's will be destroyed. Economic loss due to the Haldwani riots will be compensated by rioters says CM Dhami.
2. Abdul Malik Haji, the second mastermind behind the Haldwani violence has also been arrested.
Waqf Act - A tool of land grabbing given by the Indian National Congress to the Muslims of the Bharat
1. The Hindus who came to India after partition from Pakistan, their properties in Pakistan were occupied by the Muslims and the Government of Pakistan. But the Government of India gave the land of Muslims who went from India to Pakistan to the Waqf Boards. After which the Waqf Board Act was passed in the year 1954. But in the year 1995, by changing the Waqf Board Act, the Waqf Boards were given unlimited rights to acquire land. After which the property of the Waqf Board increased. In the year 2009, the properties of the Waqf Board were spread over four lakh acres of land. Which has now more than doubled. According to the data of Waqf Management System of India, at present there are a total 8,54,509 properties with Waqf Boards which are spread over more than eight lakh acres of land. You will be surprised to know that after the Army and Railways, LARGEST LANDBAK is with the Waqf Boards.
2. The acquisition of land by the Catholic Church of India worth more than 20,000 crores, can be attributed mainly to the Indian Churches Act of 1927, which was implemented during the British dominion. Under this act, the British dominion leased the lands acquired through their conquests in various wars at discounted rates to aid in the propagation of Christianity among the populace. This enabled the Church to acquire land across India and establish numerous institutions, including religious ones, as mentioned earlier, to disseminate their message to the masses. However, the legal status of this land acquisition remains a topic of debate.
3. The Sikh Gurdwaras Act 1925 was passed by the Punjab legislative council in British India to resolve a dispute over the management of Sikh gurdwaras. The law legally defined Sikh identity and brought Sikh gurdwaras under the control of an elected body of orthodox Sikhs. As per this act any structure notified by the government as Gurudwara shall fall under the definition provided in this act along with all the properties associated with the notified structure as Gurudwara.
4. So what about Hindu temples and religious places.
Let's us explore, how Nehru and Congress did their best to wreck the Hindu Temples and their cultural heritage by creating articles in the constitution of the Bharat to give free hand to the minorities especially waqf board and the Catholic church to amass a billion-dollar empire of the properties without any abandon.
1. So what happened to the Hindu Temples?
Until the British came to India, temples were managed by local communities. They were centers of dance and art, and at the heart of a massive, decentralized trade network.
Every temple had charitable endowments, including property given to temples, for the benefit of the community. The benefits included rest houses, pathshalas, gaushalas, and institutions for the advancement of education and feeding of the poor.
For the British agenda of colonization and conversions to succeed, the temple organization had to be weakened. So, temples were brought under government control mainly in south India because not too many temples in the north possessed such massive property or wealth. The British introduced The Madras Regulation VII of 1817 to do this.
In 1840, there was a directive from the East India Company to return the temples to their trustees, because Christian missionaries, in India and abroad, did not like the idea of Christians managing Hindu temples.
Thus, temple management was slowly, handed over to trustees and in case of prominent temples to Mutts by 1845. The Board of Revenue supervised the administration of large temples.
Next came The Religious Endowments Act 1863, which handed over temple administration to the trustees from the British government.
The primary purposes of worship and utilization of funds for the upkeep of temples were never lost sight of by the Mutathipatis or other trustees.
Hundreds of temples in the Madras Presidency were handed over to the respective trustees with the government playing little or no role in supervising them. Trustees ran the temple following the tenets applicable to the temple.
All was well till the British introduced The Madras Religious and Charitable Endowments Act 1925. It drew large protests from Muslims and Christians. Thus, it was redrafted to exclude them, made applicable to Hindus only and renamed as the Madras Hindu Religious and Endowments Act 1927.
In 1925, the Sikh Gurdwaras Act was passed that brought gurdwaras under the control of an elected body of Sikhs. So the British had one set of laws for Hindus and another for the Sikhs, Muslims and Christians.
Even today, Hindu educational institutions, temples, religious traditions are subject to government control and judicial review, look for instance at the Supreme Court order on the Sabarimala temple.
But a radical change was introduced in the legislation by way of Act XII of 1935, through which temples could be notified by the government and their administration taken over. This way the Hindu Religious Endowment Board assumed powers to take over and administer temples. The board consisted of three to five members.
Indic scholar and author @subhash_kak wrote:
"The state governments have based their policy on the recommendation of the Hindu Religious Endowments Commission headed by CP Ramaswamy Aiyer in 1960 that Hindu temples and maths be considered as belonging to the public. The government entered into the religious sphere when the Indian government was very aggressively pushing state control over all aspects of Indian life."
Post-Independence, the Tamil Nadu government took control of temples and their funds by an act passed in 1951 called the Hindu Religious and Charitable Endowments Act, 1951.The act’s provisions were challenged in the Madras High Court and subsequently in the Supreme Court in the Shirur Math case. Many provisions of the 1951 act were struck down by both courts. With some changes, The Tamil Nadu Hindu Religious and Charitable Endowments Act was passed in 1959. The Congress was in power in the country then.
It said that the purpose of the act was to see to it that religious trusts and institutions are properly administered and ensure that the income is not misused.
The new act abolished the Hindu Religious Endowments Board and vested its authority in the Hindu religious and charitable endowments department of the government headed by a commissioner.
This act opened up a template for other state governments to wrest control of the Hindu Temples and to control their functioning and management while Waqf Board, SGPC and Catholic church of India remain free at will for their functioning and management through their respective bodies with quasi-judicial powers.
The India Church Act of 1927 and the Independence Act 1947 have made Indian Church Trustees as the absolute owners of all church properties in the country. Both Catholic church of India and Church of south India are owners of a billion dollar land and property empire.
2. How Congress's policy of appeasement created Waqf Board?
Congress created Waqf Act 1954 to give all properties left behind by the Muslims immigrating to Pakistan to the new body created under the tutelage of the Central Waqf Council.
Since then, Waqf Act was amended multiple times by the respective congress governments and in 1995, Congress Government created Waqf Act, 1995 to give judicial and adminisrative powers to the Waqf Board.
Till now 30 Waqf boards are functioning in India:
Andhra Pradesh Waqf Board
Assam Wakf Board
Bihar State Sunni Waqf Board
Bihar State Shia Wakf Board
Chhattisgarh Wakf Board
Delhi Wakf Board
Gujarat Wakf Board
Haryana Waqf Board
Himachal Wakf Board
Jharkhand State Sunni Waqf Board
Karnataka Wakf Board
Kerala Wakf Board
Madhya Pradesh Wakf Board
Maharashtra State Board of Waqfs
Manipur Wakf Board
Meghalaya Wakf Board
Odisha Wakf Board
Punjab Wakf Board
Rajasthan Board of Muslim Wakfs
Tamilnadu Wakf Board
Tripura Wakf Board
Telangana Waqf Board
Uttarakhand Wakf Board
Uttar Pradesh Sunni Central Waqf Board; Shia Wakf Board (Yogi Adityanath Govt issued notification to abolish them)
West Bengal Wakf Board
Andaman Nicobar Wakf Board
Chandigarh Wakf Board
Laxdweep Wakf Board
Dadra & Nagar Haveli Wakf Board
Puducherry Wakf Board
In 2005 The Sachar Committee was created with a seven-member high-level committee established in March 2005 by former Indian Prime Minister Manmohan Singh. The committee was headed by former Chief Justice of Delhi High Court Rajinder Sachar to study the social, economic and educational condition of Muslims in India.
The committee prepared a 403-page report, titled "Social, Economic and Educational Status of the Muslim Community of India: A Report", and presented it to the Lok Sabha, the lower house of the Indian Parliament, on 30 November 2006, 20 months after obtaining the terms of reference from the Prime Minister's Office.
The Sachar Committee highlighted and presented its suggestions on how to remove impediments those preventing Indian Muslims from fully participating in the economic, political, and social mainstream of Indian life. The report was the first of its kind to reveal the "backwardness" (a term used in Indian academic and legal discourse for historically dispossessed or economically vulnerable communities, not meant to be pejorative) of Indian Muslims. An issue highlighted was that while Muslims constitute 14% of the Indian population, they only comprise 2.5% of the Indian bureaucracy. The Sachar Committee concluded that the conditions facing Indian Muslims was below that of Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes
In response to the committee's findings, Finance Minister P. Chidambaram proposed an increase to the National Minorities Development and Finance Corporation's (NMDFC) budget, citing new duties and expanded outreach that the institution would take on to implement the committee's recommendations.
()
This report gave a new validation to the already emboldened Waqf Board under the rule of the congress.
But in 2011 Justice Shashvat Kumar, who headed the Shashvat Committee prepared a status report on Muslims in India and the finding of this report was that Nationwide, Waqf properties constitute a land bank worth Rs. 1.2 lakh crore and could have generated annual returns of Rs. 12,000 crores but yielded only Rs. 163 crores and found that there was "a severe shortage of senior government officers who are Muslim to manage waqf affairs. A separate cadre would mean officers who are not only permanent but also qualified enough".
So, Congress Government again amended Waqf Act in 2013 to redefine the "Waqf" and increase its power to notify and takeover properties it considered as Waqf properties.
In the next part of the thread we will see how Hindus of the Bharat had to undergo this religious tyranny gifted by the Congress to the Waqf Baord.minorityaffairs.gov.in/show_content.p…