Josh Marshall Profile picture
Apr 1 12 tweets 3 min read Read on X
Truth Social just released their 8-K, so the SEC mandated disclosures where you can't lie without commiting a crime. Lots of focus on the dollars, which are hilarious: Just over $4.1 M in revenue, $58M in costs. ... app.quotemedia.com/data/downloadF…
I've mentioned before that this is only barely more than TPM brings in each year and since we're a real business we have costs well under $58m. But these aren't the important data points in this filing. In theory a social platform can be losing a lot of money and still ...
3/ legitimately be worth a ton of money. Facebook had already become a force of nature before Zuckerberg even real turned his attention to monetization. That turned out to be a really good idea. He put his energy into building network effects, platform dominance and only after...
4/ he'd basically won that game did he turn in earnest to monetization. So even though Truth Social losing a ton of money and only having very meager revenue makes it seem like a joke, it doesn't prove it's a joke. For the proof you need to skip down to the 4th paragraph under... Image
5/ Overview. And then you also look at the section titled Key Operating Metrics, which you can see here. Image
6/ Here it tells us that "adhering to traditional key performance indicators ... could potentially divert its focus from strategic evaluation with respect to the progress and growth of its business." Among those "traditional" indicators it includes ad impressions and ...
7/ revenue per user. Again, that's reasonable in theory. That's monetization not building the engine, if we go back to the Facebook analogy. But it also includes "active user accounts including monthly and daily active users". This is where you get the hard record scratch ...
8/ sound effect straight to bullshitville. It goes on to say that it may NEVER release those numbers. What this means is they are going to release no information about how many people use Truth Social or the details of that use. As noted, Truth Social has trivial levels of ...
9/ and like 15x the expenses. So business bleeding money like crazy. But if this two year old social network were in the process of building a robust user base which showed strong signs of on-going growth that might not matter. Again, think of Zuckerberg riding a tiger ...
10/ of explosive network/platform growth and focusing on that over near-term monetization. Truth Social is saying that it won't tell investors how many users it has, how quickly that base is growing or what its characteristics are. In fact, it says there's a good chance ...
11/ it won't ever release that data. This is clear cut. This company has zero actual value. The best case for its value is that they haven't actually tried to build the user base. So it's as tho it was still a prospectus with an amazing strategy. But in fact it's been around ...
12/ for two years and has an INSANE amount of publicity behind it. Again, this company has no value. Or I guess better to say that whatever value it may have is premised on the say so of Donald Trump.

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Josh Marshall

Josh Marshall Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @joshtpm

Jul 26
A key thing that's lead to JD Vance's unpopularity is his crusade against people who don't have kids. He wants to tax them more. He's even proposing diluting their voting rights. But the funny thing is that at least on the tax side our tax code is already replete with lots of ..
2/ of tax advantages for people with children. There's dependent deductions. There's the refundable child tax credit. There's public schools. Schools are usually funded by property taxes and you pay whether you have kids or not. In general people don't have a problem ...
3/ with this. Lots of people have kids and in general our culture is very pro-kid and pro-family (here I mean in the purely descriptive rather than right wing Christianity sense). But these programs are usually framed as helping offset the very substantial costs of raising ..
Read 7 tweets
Jul 25
Remarkably Vance is barreling toward Palin territory. He may already be there. You can see people expect news about him to be weird or embarrassing. Hard to undo that once it takes hold, especially if you are super weird and embarrassing.
2/ People forget that Vance ran a very weak campaign for senate. He was basically given up for chunk meat and McConnell had to go to Thiel and tell him he had to come in and save his boy, which he did. Ryan ran a really good campaign.
3/When they’re asking Trump on Fox whether he screwed up picking Vance you know it’s not going great. Whether it’s menstrual surveillance or saying people without kids shouldn’t be able to vote or his please clap level speaking style the dude is weird.
Read 4 tweets
Jul 25
Here’s a thought experiment. New political candidate, Fred Smith. When Smith gives speeches he routinely brags about the time someone shot at him and he was struck by a bullet and was lucky to have survived. Then it comes out that it’s not clear he was hit by a bullet at all.
2/ it might have been a bullet or it might just have been some debris from some nearby object that was hit by a bullet. From your experience as a news consumer based on how reporters treat discrepancies in personal stories candidates make part of their basic stump …
3/ speech, how do you think that would play? Not how you think it should, how are those things usually treated. My experience as a news consumer is that those discrepancies always generate new questions. And not addressing the questions just intensifies them. Factual …
Read 5 tweets
Jul 24
Okay. I think we now know this specific part of the story. Trumps ear was lightly injured in the shooting. Police told reporters he was hit by flying debris. Trump went on Truth Social and declared he was hit by a bullet. And basically all major media went with that as a fact.
2/ It seems quite possible to me that no one has any idea what hit Trumps ear. So Trump just said it was a bullet. I know that an editor at a major news org told a colleague that they figure it was Trumps personal opinion but it wasn’t worth getting into a fight with the …
3/ campaign over. It is not the central part of the story precisely how Trump was injured. Someone tried to shoot him and could well have succeeded. But it is simply absurd to run with a social media post from Trump himself. Even though Trump was the target of an assassination …
Read 7 tweets
Jul 24
Cynical and false.

What locked in Harris was the overwhelming resistance of D voters and activists to anyone else. It was national columnists and a large number of D elites pushing for a thunderdome primary. A good bit of this was support for Harris herself. A lot of it was …
2/ that with the incumbent president and presumed nominee out and no time to run anything more than a fake primary she had legitimacy on her side. 80 million voters literally chose her to be person who took over for Joe Biden if he couldnt serve. D primary voters in effect …
3/ just reconfirmed that this spring, since Biden and Harris were again running as a package deal. The democratic legitimacy argument of her claim, the fact that veeps succeeding presidents is so embedded in US politics made her the one person who all party …
Read 11 tweets
Jul 22
A basic primer on this question of whether state laws prevent a late "switch" of candidates on the ballot. No. They don't. Here's why.

Election laws don't work the same way for major party nominees and independent candidates. State laws have a space set aside for the ...
2/ nominee of the Republican party and Democratic party. It's just a placeholder until there's a nominee. The Democratic party doesn't currently have a nominee. The GOP only got one last week. This is usually treated as a technicality, sure. But it's the critical LEGAL ...
3/ technical. There's literally no switch because Biden's name isn't on any ballot in the country. End of story. It's really that simple. There's a separate issue that in a few states the deadline for the party choosing its nominee is earlier than the Democratic ...
Read 6 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us!

:(