1/ Recent years have seen a surge in violent crimes in London:
• Sexual offences at all-time high
• Knife crime at an all-time high (with only 1 in 6 solved)
• Teenage murders at all-time high
• Increase in muggings and robberies
#London #Crime
🧵
2/ After a FOIA request, we can observe the ethnic groups committing the majority of violent crime.
First let's establish the demography of London:
• 53.8% White*
• 20% Asian
• 13.5% Black
• 6.3% Other
3/ *It's important to highlight that almost one-third of Whites in London are not of British origin, including Albanians, who represent the most extensive crime network in the UK and are hugely overrepresented in the prison system (1 in 100 Albanians are currently in jail).
4/ Let's start with Homicide Offences
White: 29.12%
Black: 59.34%
Black individuals are arrested for homicide at a rate 8.12 times higher than Whites. To put this in context, men are only nine times more prone to commit murder compared to women globally.
5/ It’s worth noting that homicides perpetrated by non-White groups are more likely to occur in the street, whereas White homicides tend to be located in domestic settings
Blacks are arrested for robbery offences at a rate 6.47 times higher than Whites. Additionally, Blacks are 320% more likely to be the perpetrators rather than victims
9/ Sexual Offences
White: 48.15%
Black: 29.58%
Black individuals are 2.45x more likely to be arrested than Whites. Black community sees a 65.44% higher chance of perpetration, while Whites are 13.05% more likely to be victims
10/ Violence Against the Person Offences
White: 48.56%
Black: 33.02%
Black individuals are 2.71x more likely to be arrested for Violence Against the Person Offences than Whites. They're also 91.87% more likely to be perpetrators.
11/ Youth crime has also become a significant concern.
Incidents involving large groups, predominantly of Black youth, engaging in activities like store looting have become common in the capital
Two-thirds of youth arrested in London are non-White
3/ The British government subsidised cheap passage for over a million Britons to move to Australia (as well as NZ/Rhodesia) at the same they were supposedly begging for Barbadians and Jamaicans to come save the economy.
1/ How many times have you encountered this headline?
It's often repeated by those who wish to downplay the the Islamic overrepresentation in group CSE
In this thread, I will show how contemptibly misleading this headline is and reveal the truth behind the grooming gang scandal
2/ The Home Office report, the source of this headline, reveals that Whites (88% of the population at the time of these studies) are massively underrepresented, while Asians (7% of the population) and Blacks (3% of the population) are overrepresented in every single report cited
3/ It's important to note that the Home Office report didn't directly investigate grooming gangs. Instead, it relied on earlier reports using data predating the cover-up revelation.
3/ The British government subsidised cheap passage for huge numbers of Britons to move to Australia at the same they were supposedly begging for Barbadians and Jamaicans to come save the economy.
3/ Let's start with Sweden, who accepted the highest number of refugees p/c during the 2015 migrant crisis
As a result, it is now the only European nation experiencing an increase in fatal gun crimes since the turn of the century, with rates 2.5x higher than the European average
Here's a map which shows the contribution of different nationalities in Holland
The Anglosphere (and Nordic nations) outperform everyone else, including the natives
This does not mean Anglos are better than the Dutch, it's just that people who migrate are highly selected
The Japanese are model minorities in Western countries with far lower crime rates than the native population
However the reverse is also true. Due to Japan's immigration policy, a native Japanese person is 11.7x more likely to commit a crime than a North American migrant
1/ Back in 2012, a 7/7 bombings survivor and a man who could trace his British ancestry back to the 14th century was told that he was no longer welcomed in the UK.
This is the strange case of the deportation of Professor John Tulloch
🧵
2/ So why did the Home Office and UK Border Agency (UKBA) seize his passport and are demanded his deportation?
Because he was born in India during the British Empire era, making him a "British subject without citizenship."
3/ Although his father was in India due to his Army duties, Prof Tulloch's birthplace, under new rules, made him ineligible for dual nationality.
After gaining Australian citizenship due to work, he lost his British nationality despite having a British wife and children