The Cultural Tutor Profile picture
Apr 5, 2024 24 tweets 9 min read Read on X
There's more to the world of art than Leonardo da Vinci and Pablo Picasso.

So here are 11 brilliant, beautiful, & bizarre painters you've (probably) never heard of: Image
1. Hans Baluschek (1870-1935)

Baluschek was fascinated by industrialisation: the rise of factories, chimney stacks, machinery, and trains, along with the lives of the people in these rapidly growing, smog-filled metroplises.

As in City of Workers, from 1920: Image
Baluschek's paintings feel like a world of their own — a sort of endless dream (or nightmare?) of a vast, industrial city, always at night, always filled with stories and hidden moments, seen from a thousand different perspectives.

Cinematic and compelling. Railway Station (1929) and Rain (1917)
2. Tsukioka Yoshitoshi (1839-1892)

The last great master of traditional Japanese ukiyo-e prints before modernisation swept them away.

Yoshitoshi was a prolific designer of ukiyo-e who pushed the genre further than anybody had done in its three centuries of history. Image
Whereas the likes of Hokusai and Hiroshige are famous for their harmony and relative simplicity, Yoshitoshi embraced chaos and disorder.

His series range from comical to ghastly to gruesome to epic, and embrace everything from samurai legends to daily life. Image
3. Marie Spartali Stillman (1844-1927)

One of the great Pre-Raphaelite artists — this was a British movement which tried to return art to its Medieval roots of colour and detail, before the Renaissance had stripped that away.

Stillman's paintings are almost like tapestries. Love's Messenger (1885)
She was a master of colour and texture, somehow giving her paintings a sort of shimmering quality.

And notice, in her painting of the great Italian poet Petrarch meeting his muse, Laura, her careful attention both to their clothes and to the details of Gothic architecture. Image
4. Thomas Chambers (1808-1869)

A rather unusual painter whose stylised scenes of ships were genuinely decades ahead of their time.

He was born in the old English port town of Whitby but moved to and became a citizen of the US.

Chambers was a modernist before modernism existed. Image
Chambers was not recognised for nearly a century after his life, partly because his paintings were mostly unsigned and partly because of how unusual he was.

His style is similar to Grant Wood, of American Gothic fame, with those smooth surfaces and cartoon-like forms. Image
5. Shen Zhou (1427-1509)

Shen Zhou was one of the later artists in the long and time-honoured tradition of landscape painting at the Chinese courts.

This was about capturing the essence of a landscape rather than its mere outward appearance.

Poetry as painting. Image
Many of his paintings are delightfully minimalist, giving us either details — fruit, leaves, branches, birds — or entire landscapes with the fewest possible brushstrokes.

Serene, peaceful, soothing. Image
6. Jacob Isaaczoon van Swaneburg (1571-1638)

He was, perhaps, a man after his time — his art harked back to the wild imaginings of Hieronymus Bosch and Pieter Brueghel the Elder.

But, if you like those painters, you'll love Isaaczoon van Swaneburg. Image
He embraced that same madness which teeters on the brink between genuinely horrifying and almost comically surreal.
Image
Image
7. Charles Meryon (1821-1868)

A fascinating man with a complex life that ended in tragedy.

Meryon always wanted to be a painter but because he suffered from severe colourblindness he could not do it.

So he turned to etching and became a master of that form instead. Image
Meryon produced dozens of gorgeously atmospheric, brooding, Gothic vignettes of Paris.

He had a keen eye for architecture and for the details of urban life, from clusters of weeds growing on buildings to the dingy corners and unscrupulous characters of the city. Image
8. Giovanni di Paolo (1403-1482)

Di Paolo was part of the "Sienese School" — this was a group of artists who held on to the old, Medieval ways of painting rather than following the new methods of the Renaissance.

Old-fashioned by design — and delightfully archaic. Image
If you like this sort of highly stylised, Early Renaissance art then you'll love Giovanni di Paolo.

He also made a series of illustrations for Dante's Divine Comedy which are worth looking at if only to see how Medieval people visualised that famous journey. Image
9. Sofonisba Anguissola (1532-1625)

One of the first female painters of the Italian Renaissance, mentioned in Giorgio Vasari's famous Lives of the Artists and apparently admired by Michelangelo.

She had a distinctive, almost pearlescent style, and a fabulous sense of humour. Image
For her self-portrait Anguissola painted her teacher, Bernadino Campi, while he was painting a portrait of her, thus capturing both of them of them at once.

No doubt some subtle jokes or meta-commentary going on here. Image
10. Samuel Prout (1783-1852)

One of the greatest watercolourists who ever lived, a self-taught artist from Plymouth in southern England who travelled around capturing ordinary street scenes whether in Britain or in Europe.

Like Meryon he was a master of architectural details. Image
But that's not all; Prout was also fond of ships and of the sea, and he painted these with that same ability to conjure a sense of grand scale and minute detail at once.

On the whole his art is incredibly peaceful. Image
11. Jacek Malczewski (1854-1929)

Jan Matejko is surely Poland's greatest painter — but Jan Malczewski, a master of Symbolism, isn't far behind.

His style is hard to explain and, true to the Symbolist creed, his meanings are even harder to decipher. Image
And so Malczewski's paintings are worth investigation — attempting to unravel their meaning, even when he is painting a scene from the Bible or Mythology, is always a journey for the viewer.

Besides, his use of colours and unusual angles create visual riddles of their own.
Image
Image
So these were just 11 of thousands of wonderful artists from around the world and across the centuries.

Leonardo and Picasso may be the most famous — but you don't have to like them.

The world of art rewards exploration, and the internet has made that simpler than ever...

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with The Cultural Tutor

The Cultural Tutor Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @culturaltutor

Jun 10
Who's to blame for boring architecture? Image
Politics and architecture don't map onto one another very well; trying to understand what leads to good architecture through political "isms" doesn't really get us anywhere.

While the USSR was building a baroque metro system, the USA was building modernist skyscrapers: Image
So the architecture debate is very strange, because opposing "sides" feel obliged to defend things that don't match their other views.

Some people want more "traditional" architecture, and others defend "modern" architecture.

These are, broadly speaking, the supposed "sides". Image
Read 25 tweets
Jun 8
Taking decoration away from buildings is like creating a world where trees never have any leaves: Image
The biggest difference between how we build now and how we used to build (in terms of appearance) is that we no longer decorate anything.

There are thousands of other changes (regulations, materials, size) but this is the one that people notice. Image
And this was, partly, a conscious aesthetic choice.

If you look at the early modernists like Adolf Loos and Le Corbusier, they are very open about their belief that decoration was no longer necessary.

As Loos said, famously: Image
Read 25 tweets
Jun 3
The truth about minimalism: Image
"Minimalism" is badly misunderstood, but that's not really anybody's fault, because we're living in a time where it feels like minimalism is the dominant aesthetic.

Everything from buildings to bollards are designed the same way: simple, no details, little variety or colour. Image
And so, because they're simple, we call it "minimalism".

But minimalism was never just about keeping things simple.

The point of minimalism is using beautiful materials to make useful things (like this chair), not making things as bland and greyscale as possible. Image
Read 25 tweets
Mar 3
Friedensreich Regentag Dunkelbunt Hundertwasser is the best modern architect you've never heard of.

His philosophy was simple. As he said:

"The straight line is godless and immoral."

If there's any building you can think of, he made it look like something from a dream... Image
Accommodation at a children's hospital in Essen, Germany, from 2005: Image
A kindergarten in Frankfurt, opened in 1995: Image
Read 23 tweets
Aug 31, 2025
We spend more than 90% of our time inside, so why do we design so many of our interiors like this?

Grey carpets, white walls, harsh lighting.

It's generic, boring, and genuinely bad for our physical and psychological health... Image
Not all interiors look like this, but too many do, and more all the time.

Grey carpets, white walls, harsh lighting, neutral colours for details, everything plastic, shiny, and rectangular.

This has become the standard for new buildings (and refurbishments) around the world. Image
A common response is that some people like it, or at least don't mind it.

Maybe, but that's the problem.

The sum of all tastes is no taste at all, and if our aim is simply to make things that people "don't mind" then we end up with blandness. Image
Read 22 tweets
Aug 21, 2025
The world's most famous neoclassical buildings are kind of boring and generic when you actually look at them.

It's even hard to tell them apart: which one below is Versailles, or Buckingham Palace?

So here's why neoclassical architecture (although it's nice) is overrated: Image
Buckingham Palace, despite being one of the world's most famous and visited buildings, is essentially quite boring and uninspiring from the outside.

There's a certain stateliness to it, but (like most big neoclassical buildings) it's really just a box wrapped in pilasters. Image
The same is true of Versailles.

Again, it's evidently pretty (largely thanks to the colour of its stone) but there's something weirdly plain about it, almost standardised.

Plus the emphasis on its horizontal lines makes it feel very low-lying, undramatic, and flat. Image
Read 26 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us!

:(